What's new

China Releases the Original Galwan Chinese Indian Clash Video

you may find this surprising because your IQ is so high that you miss the little details but....when a brigade of soldiers is responsible for an area, they appear again and again whenever engagements....
Check your record. There was no such fully armed clash before and after June 15.
 
.

What's fishy is that they captured begining and end of it and skipped the actual skirmish. Wondering why? Not making any conclusions. Just curious if anybody may explain.
They showed Chinese troops surrounded by 100s of Indian soldiers and then commander being pushed by Indian troops and then all of the sudden everything was not recorded except the end where they were giving first aid to the commander. If Indian soldiers acted as aggressors and were beaten badly, why not publish it as well (Assuming the recording was on)? It would be in their favour to show how Indian soldiers attacked Chinese soldiers. Not saying Indians killed more. It may because Chinese had this planned and attacked with sharp weapons stashed before hand as planned.
You need to pay extra for the bloody parts :lol:
We will as long as you get access to them. Oh sorry, i forgot, money can't buy that. They publish only what the CCP government allows to. We will buy this version only as we can't by the actual footage showing chinese being humiliated.
 
.
Check your record. There was no such fully armed clash before and after June 15.

says who? People don't have authority to carry weapons but they can carry batons. They've been doing that for years. Besides PLA has been hiding somuch, what record are you talking about? IA has been on record that many clashes have happened in the last few months. Almost always because PLA fools violate agreements like 'dont't construct tents' etc.
 
. . .
A
They showed Chinese troops surrounded by 100s of Indian soldiers and then commander being pushed by Indian troops and then all of the sudden everything was not recorded except the end where they were giving first aid to the commander. If Indian soldiers acted as aggressors and were beaten badly, why not publish it as well (Assuming the recording was on)? It would be in their favour to show how Indian soldiers attacked Chinese soldiers. Not saying Indians killed more. It may because Chinese had this planned and attacked with sharp weapons stashed before hand as planned.

We will as long as you get access to them. Oh sorry, i forgot, money can't buy that. They publish only what the CCP government allows to. We will buy this version only as we can't by the actual footage showing chinese being humiliated.
And where are those tents at 57 second? Perished in skirmish?
 
. .
says who? People don't have authority to carry weapons but they can carry batons. They've been doing that for years. Besides PLA has been hiding somuch, what record are you talking about? IA has been on record that many clashes have happened in the last few months. Almost always because PLA fools violate agreements like 'dont't construct tents' etc.
Indian media are not trustworthy. They alway call black white. The earlier skirmishes are like this video. See the differences? No amor. small scale.
 
.
Indian media are not trustworthy. They alway call black white. The earlier skirmishes are like this video. See the difference? No amor. small scale.

Actually in this video which hapened during that time we were beating a chinese soldier to pulp with a baton. So no, 'arms' meant only guns
 
. .
Actually in this video which hapened during that time we were beating a chinese soldier to pulp with a baton. So no, 'arms' meant only guns
In my first video. Indian soldiers equipped with amor. And the big number of the amy. You can easily tell this is assault troop. It's a well planned action. Except June 15 clash, no other massive assault happened.
A

And where are those tents at 57 second? Perished in skirmish?
If you understand Chinese, you will know the tents scene happened in different time. Background voice told that.
 
. .
In my first video. Indian soldiers equipped with amor. And the big number of the amy. You can easily tell this is assault troop. It's a well planned action. Except June 15 clash, no other massive assault happened.

how did you decide that? Because PLA told you so? You think 50,000 troops of India were just hacthing eggs? IA has clearly stated that many, many clashes took place because of chinese provocations and this proves it. The Chinese had agreed not to put up tents...then why did you? The moment you put it up, we had to dismantle it.
 
.
We will as long as you get access to them. Oh sorry, i forgot, money can't buy that. They publish only what the CCP government allows to. We will buy this version only as we can't by the actual footage showing chinese being humiliated.

Why can't you ask IA to release their version of footage to satisfy your desire?
 
.
1, Indian soliders were fully armed and prepared. Chinese soliders were unarmed and outnumbered. Otherwise China should not have lost 3 soldiers.
2. Clearly Indians were invaders.

And yet they killed 20 Indian soldiers and sustained only 4 casualties. Pure Chinese logic.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom