What's new

China Releases the Original Galwan Chinese Indian Clash Video

how did you decide that? Because PLA told you so? You think 50,000 troops of India were just hacthing eggs? IA has clearly stated that many, many clashes took place because of chinese provocations and this proves it. The Chinese had agreed not to put up tents...then why did you? The moment you put it up, we had to dismantle it.
Of course I know. Such serious assault would be definitely reported if ever happened. I don't answer any question from Indian media.
And yet they killed 20 Indian soldiers and sustained only 4 casualties. Pure Chinese logic.
Most Indian soldier were killed by the harsh weather.
 
. . . .
Let this just sink in for everyone.

India
Armed soldiers.
Numerical advantage.

China
Unarmed soldiers.
Numerical disadvantage.

Result
Indian loss

You can’t give a more lopsided advantage to India than that and yet they still lost.

Indians should be ashamed of their military. This is embarrassing.
 
. . .
can I offer an outside - don't give a damn perspective. The whole incident is comical if not for the loss of human lives on both sides over some completely inhospitable terrain with no strategic value.

- It doesn't really matter how many solders were killed by either India or China
- it doesn't really matter who lost how much territory to the other.

The naked truth to an outside observer - both sides are afraid of escalating; they obviously fear each other. For all the chest thumping by both sides - this is a massive waste of everyones time.
 
.
Nice video editing, why not show us the actual footage of the fight. You think world will take you jokers seriously, show this to your slave countrymen to make them happy. If the real footage is shown it will be clear that who was the aggressor and how many soldiers actually died there.
 
. .
Nice video editing, why not show us the actual footage of the fight.
This is like "why not show us the actual footage of the war?" Because the camera man could not risk his life to do it in the middle of a battle. The camera man is one of Chinese soldiers.
 
.
Let this just sink in for everyone.

India
Armed soldiers.
Numerical advantage.

China
Unarmed soldiers.
Numerical disadvantage.

Result
Indian loss

You can’t give a more lopsided advantage to India than that and yet they still lost.

Indians should be ashamed of their military. This is embarrassing.

To be fair, initially Indians were very "brave" when they had 10 to 1 numerical advantage.

When PLA reinforcement arrived the scene, Indians started fleeing and killed themselevs in process.
 
.
Stop misleading. Qi Fabao(middle) was wounded on June 15. How come he still stood there on June 16? And there wouldn't be such peaceful negotiation on June 16
View attachment 717731
1613741738828.png
First Qi Fabao photo was taken in late fternoon of June 15.
Second pic was early morning June 16.
 
.
Hypothermia is a slow death, if that is instantaneous then russians cannot take bath in cold ravers and arctic sea.
Anyway, Indians were prepared at least. Happy, that they died by fighting. A soldiers deserves that.
Plus there are many videos showing Chinese repelling Indians, so another one wont add anything new. @waz please delete the posts which are unscientific and childish that why now actual brawl video.
 
.
This is like "why not show us the actual footage of the war"? Because the camera man could not risk his life to do it in the middle of a battle.
Haha nonsense, the scene where the bleeding chinese soldier is being carried looks directly from action, so if that got recorded them he must have recorded the fight as well, it has been edited nicely to make your criminal henchmen army look innocent & arouse nationalistic feelings, unfortunately no one takes you jokers seriously in the world, you can show this propaganda video to your submissive slave people to make them feel good
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom