China ready to cede land for part of Arunachal Pradesh?

[Upagrah]

Lol even your defense official lobby Russia so hard to prevent China to acquire S-400, they all know that Modi and Indian 4 stars generals will never be able to step into New Delhi in eventual conflict with China. As for high altitude, you just make an unfounded assessment of our pilot capability in Tibet, our medical team has provided our pilots with the best life support in Tibet, China will never let India to have an air superiority over this region

Or Tawang for water, that our counter-offer, if not your north East will become a wasted land due to the water shortage...that's a good deal.

Nobody has air superiority over tibet. Its an inhospitable terrain.

Beyond that your post is just a foolish rant. It was fun for a day, but now I have lost interest in trolling you.

EOD Tawang is not for sale. Now pass on that message to CCP and come up with a new plan for peace.

If we're thief and what are you? according to Winston Churchill "India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the Equator." India has never exist until 1947, you guys are greedier than us and occupied the entire India include Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh, Tamil Nadu. And struggle now in the greed to occupy Kashmir that belong to Pakistan.

If India does not exist, they why are you demanding Twang ? You are demanding something from a non entity.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

considering the number of killings you guys have done in Tibet after illegally occupying it its far better to live with discrimination than being killed by the Chinese

Go to check yourself in the mirror, if Indians are angels, there is no so call Maoist and ULFA.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Thanks for your comment. Suzerainty is not sovereignty and by definition presumes the existence of one distinct political body under varying degrees of control under another. And if Tibet was recognised as part of sovereign China in 1914 there would be no need to invite China distinctly from Tibet as a negotiating party. Furthermore the fact that Tibet signed the agreement despite China walking out shows that even this suzerainty was limited.

Britain itself exercised suzerainty over the princely states as also several kingdoms such as Afghanistan, Bhutan and Sikkim. Even China was, following the Unequal Treaties - under a degree of British suzerainty (along with other european powers). Similarly after WW1 and WW2 the axis / central powers were under Allied suzerainty.
None of that has ever been used to defer or refuse compliance of an international obligation made under the exercise of such suzerainty.

Aksai Chin may be strategically important today with the OBOR initiative but that was not always the case. Zhou in 1960 was clever enough to distinguish the weak claim (Tawang, AP) from the strong claim (Aksai Chin) and merely wanted to capitalise on that - which is why I suspect the PLA withdrew from AP but not from Aksai. I lend stronger credence to inferences made from Chinese actions in 1960 compared to 2017. China in that period was less self-sufficient and forced to adhere to international law. Today of course, it can afford to disregard it altogether (as we saw in the SC Sea ruling). I do not say this to poke fun of China - merely to indicate that leaders in the 60s would have been extra careful to not take actions that would be in breach of international law.

Off topic - I find it cute how your fan kiddy here with the Zia avatar keeps posting his uneducated one-liners and thanking any old post which in his perception is directed against India even remotely.

Aren't you the loser who said the Amir of Afghanistan never agreed with the Durand line, but the the Amir of Afghanistan did agree with the Durand line in 1919 in the treaty of Rawalpindi.

LOL LOL LOL!!!

At least Zia had balls unlike you!!!

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

If India does not exist, they why are you demanding Twang ? You are demanding something from a non entity.

Get your fact right, Tawang belong to China way before the existence of India, only those Britains robe for us and illegally gave to Indians.

 

[lonelyman]

Go to check yourself in the mirror, if Indians are angels, there is no so call Maoist and ULFA.

don't forget Gujarat massacre

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

China can beg for whatever it feels like - it won't get squat. It hasn't been able to given Taiwan back. It is one thing to occupy and take-over a country of Buddhist monks - quite another to fight others. Thankfully, the Chinese Govt. is aware of its own limitations even if its people are downright daft.

We don't beg because we all know that your government wouldn't dare not to say "No" about the boundary negotiation, this is the 20th round we drag this issue for ever and India has no choice by to comply to our demand and come back on the negotiation table. If Indian government has the gut then just say No to the negotiation and we will see what will happen.

China wants to take US's place as a global leader and with that intention China needs her neighbors on her side. We are in a position of strength to negotiate here not China.

Position of strength to negotiate with China???...this sound like blackmail to me , doesn't work with China, India has to try harder

chinese media wont let you see facts or real history, USA,UK , france all had open trade relations with Tibet , they recognized as a country.

If next day, we recognized NE ASSAM regardless if Indian government approve or not and then use that evident to claim that ASSAM is an independent country as well, are Indian people will accept that?

 

[Zen0]

Get your fact right, Tawang belong to China way before the existence of India, only those Britains robe for us and illegally gave to Indians.

Tibet was a internationally recognised independent country, with trade relations with U.S. , uk , Soviets. you have 0 rights on any territorial claims post annexation.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Tibet was a internationally recognised independent country, with trade relations with U.S. , uk , Soviets. you have 0 rights on any territorial claims post annexation.

check my post #186

 

[Zen0]

If next day, we recognized NE ASSAM regardless if Indian government approve or not and then use that evident to claim that ASSAM is an independent country as well, are Indian people will accept that?

As believable ad your claim that the moon is Chinese because the Chinese princesses married the moon

check my post #186

Chinese and their claims

 

[MultaniGuy]

As believable ad your claim that the moon is Chinese because the Chinese princesses married the moon


Chinese and their claims

Its SATIRE! . LOL LOL LOL. Read the sentence at the bottom of the article!

Didn't you Indian see that LOL!!!!

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

go ahead..who is stopping you....tomorrow you will say you can dry whole of ocean as well and make whole world a dry place...height of stupidity.
monsoons happen because of ranges on the Indian, burmese and nepal side of the himalayas ranges. It does not even reaches to the ranges which are on the tibetan plateau.

But you can start with your pixel today and report back the daily progress. BTW where will you put all the earth moved from this exercise? Bejing?

Indeed we don't need India to approve of what we want to do in our side of fence, but don't cry a river like when we dam Brahmaputra.

 

[Zen0]

Its SATIRE! . LOL LOL LOL. Read the sentence at the bottom of the article!

Didn't you Indian see that LOL!!!!

That's the point , can't understand memes now?

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

As believable ad your claim that the moon is Chinese because the Chinese princesses married the moon


Chinese and their claims

Well if you said so...or if they said so

Its SATIRE! . LOL LOL LOL. Read the sentence at the bottom of the article!

Didn't you Indian see that LOL!!!!

Good Job man , you know...some Indians these days

 

[Zen0]

Indeed we don't need India to approve of what we want to do in our side of fence, but don't cry a river like when we dam Brahmaputra.

Ya, Good luck with that , stopping Bhramaputra will hit Bangladesh & Bhutan harder than India. Not to mention most of Bhramaputra is downstream fueled by channels rather than a single river , only a fraction cromes from yangzi jaiang

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Try these stupid rants on some one else.

Sound stupid but Indians like to cry a river when ever we did something in Tibet such construct the railway, build dam, divert water ...they're just tooo sensitive, imagine if we go forward and open the passage for Monsoon to cross to China

But unfortunately for India, neither we are scared of your old tantrums, nor we are going to take it lying down anymore. For every threat China is being answered in the same tone & manner.

Boldly said ,are you implied that Indians are scared of China all these time before your current statement?

Border dispute with China is not like Bangladesh Border. If chinese were so convinced about Tawang being their territory they would have taken it in 1962.

That's because India Nehru went cry over Kennedy's shoulder and Soviet begging for help after 1962 defeat, we all know these two were not friendly with China at that time, otherwise we will cut the chicken neck and having border with Bangladesh by now.

Ya, Good luck with that , stopping Bhramaputra will hit Bangladesh & Bhutan harder than India. Not to mention most of Bhramaputra is downstream fueled by channels rather than a single river , only a fraction cromes from yangzi jaiang

then why your government and Media were crying like no end regarding this issue...LMAO