LOL dude, you are embarrassing yourself with each post by failing to prove how Korean OLED is superior to Chinese OLED.
It is you embarrassing your self with consistent idiocy.
I have shown you LG OLED 77 inch. => 1 prove
I have shown you how BOE struggel with OLED, thats why your Skyworth, Changhong, and Konka buy OLED panel from LG => 1 prove
So total: 2 prove
You've now ADMITTED that China is on par with LCD technology which is the technology that's commercially used. China is also on par with Korea on Quantum Dot.
You still can't PROVE how Korean OLED is superior technology where I've shown China has LCD, OLED and Quantum Dot technology. You said China is behind Korea in display technology and you can't even prove any of your laughable assertions. Now you're here bragging about Korea having largest OLED TV to prove they have better quality where in a previous post you said having the largest doesn't prove quality
You don't know what you're even saying. You've lost the argument in utterly humiliating fashion and now trying to divert attention. You are not fooling anyone.
It is you embarrassing your self with consistent idiocy.
I have shown you LG OLED 77 inch. => 1 prove
I have shown you how BOE struggel with OLED, thats why your Skyworth, Changhong, and Konka buy OLED panel from LG => 1 prove
So total: 2 prove
OLED won't take off as Quantum dot does the same thing as OLED at a fraction of the cost. OLED is not commercially viable and unless the cost comes down, no one will waste their resources on a technology that won't take off in the global market.
You dumb. I've explained you many times that the OLED cost could come down when the production technology become mature and economic scale reach.
And Quantum dot is not really considered the same thing as OLED, OLED still has edge:
Thus, while QD TVs produce beautifully rendered, realistic colors that compare favorably to OLED, they fail at creating a perfect black that OLED absolutely excels at generating by literally going dark.
This is why Quantum Dots aren’t quite as good as OLED in 4K TVs -
China and Korea are equal in commercially viable LCD and Quantum dot. LCD is proven that's it's accepted by the global market. Your assertion that Korea is so far ahead of China in display technology has proven as a complete and utter lie.
I'm still waiting for your proof of Korea being ahead of China in the other 13 industries. Only in memory chips will I say Korea is ahead of China. You will have to prove EVERY SINGLE other industry you stated and me and other members will verify your claims.
You've already lost the display technology battle.
Dream on.
You are so ignorant.
China and Korea on par with Quantum, but Korea ahead in OLED. So totally Korea is ahead. You cant ignore OLED just because you dont like it or you think the market is not good. We are talking about technology mastery not business; furthermore the battle is still on. So live with it
I have prove you korea still ahead in automotive. Your bragging simply market share and Volvo name only show your clueless about technology mastery.
LOL. The guy is a pretty stupid. He doesn't know what he's talking about. OLED. Let me educate him about it. LOL
As I have said before, OLED is an American company invention. The first adoption is actually Sony back in 2013. LG and Samsung thought that was the "future of flat panel" so both jump immediately into OLED. What they didn't realize is that it is extremely costly to make and there is a high chance of defect. So Samsung jumped off the wagon, halt their OLED production, and jumped on the Quantum Dot Display wagon which was promoted by Chinese TV heavyweight Hisense and TCL. Quantum Dot Display got similar to OLED picture quality yet half the price of OLED. It makes perfect sense for display companies to choose Quantum Dot as the future mainstream display platform. However, LG already invested heavily into OLED. They lost money, desperate to find new partners to team up to promote OLED. They sell OLED to Chinese suppliers Skyworth in the hope that more Chinese firm will join the OLED wagon and promoted OLED in the biggest market in the world. Though, Hisense and TCL have little interest in joining; instead rather promoted the Quantum Dot Display which Samsung and LG jumped on the wagon now. LOL
So in the end, we will see who will win the Display of the future. OLED vs Quantum Dot.
LOL. You the clueless boy why dont you tell this to Panasonic' boss Mashahiro Shinada, who is very much experienced in TV business and technology compared to amateur like you
OLED TVs will get cheaper, Panasonic's TV boss says, predicting that the self-illuminating television tech will be within reach of average consumers in a few years' time.
I'm very confident panel cost will go down," says Shinada, arguing that growth in OLED for business purposes (when the tech is used in signs or retail displays) will help to lower prices on the consumer side too. The TV boss expects that if panel suppliers can improve their yield ratios -- that is, the number of OLED panels produced that are fit to be put into TVs, rather than scrapped -- prices will drop dramatically. "Last year, the panel suppliers' yield was very, very low level" Shinada said. "But currently this ratio is now growing."
Panasonic TV chief: OLED televisions will be affordable in 2-3 years - CNET
I've told you, if the production technology become mature the price will go down, but you seems so dumb.
The reason why Skyworth, and numerous chinese tv maker jump into OLED wagon because they share the same understanding with Shinada that they should be in the wagon so that they wont be left behind in business when the price has come down and become affordable.
The reason why LG and Samsung also jump into Quantum Dot, is simply because they are so big and leader in TV business, so they should not be left behind in most TV sectors.
Your reasoning doesn't work.
No comments on the solar panel efficiency race that is increasing every few months? You're the one that asked for information on solar panels in your previous post. Why so silent all of a sudden?
Also I've yet to see YOU provide proof to back up any of the South Korean industries you listed.
You are the one who claim China is ahead Korea in solar panel, so the burden to prove is on you as the claimer.
I could also argue that there is nothing technologically unique about Samsung Galaxy smartphones. Xiaomi and Huawei high-end phones are very competitive with Samsung in terms of technology. But does Samsung offer workstations and servers like Lenovo does? How can you claim tech superiority when you don't even offer the product?
------------------------------
I did not claim Korea ahead China in PC industry, it is you who claim China is ahead Korea in PC industry.
So the burden to prove is on you as the claimer.
Also allow me to offer some of my thoughts on Hyundai cars because I know you'll eventually try to use the auto industry to disparage China. So I'll start talking about it before you do.
Hyundai has had some recent 'success' in the US for these reasons:
1. The US economy has not been doing well in recent years.
2. Hyundai offers affordable models like the Accent, Elantra, and Sonata at competitive prices.
And the most important reason of all...
3. Hyundai offers 'America's Best Warranty' at 10 years/100,000 miles.
Basically, people choose a new Hyundai over a used car. With a Hyundai, people get a cheap car and a warranty that covers the entire life of the car. No other automaker offers a warranty like this. I'm sure if Toyota offered the Corolla with 10-yr/100k mile warranty, people would flock to it too. But they don't have to because the Toyota Corolla is already one of the best selling cars in the world.
But has it ever occurred to anyone why Hyundai needed such a comprehensive warranty to begin with? Is it because their cars are unreliable in the first place?
Here's a Hyundai horror story:
America's Worst Warranty - Why I Will Never Buy Another Hyundai | See Debt Run
Perhaps this is nothing more than anecdotal evidence. And I'm sure
some people love their Hyundai cars. But the story is indicative of the type of people who buy Hyundai in the first place. The guy was a recent college graduate (with very little money) and decided to buy a Hyundai over a used car. His car broke down at 60k miles and Hyundai refused to honor the warranty. Long story short he was screwed.
And now to my point.
Nobody WANTS to own a Hyundai. There's nothing special about Hyundai technology or build quality. People buy Hyundai because that is all they can afford. I know Hyundai has some 'high-end' models. But nobody that can afford a Hyundai Equus would choose it over a Lexus LS 460. Absolutely nobody. The Mercedes-Benz S-Class would be head and shoulders above both. People that can afford cars in this price range don't care if they pay an extra $20k.
And I continue to stand by my original statement. Most people would prefer to own a Volvo over a Hyundai.
And why you compare Korea (Hyundai) with Japan (Toyota) and Germany (Mercedez) ?
Why dont you compare Korea (Hyundai) with China (Geely, Chery, SAIC, BYD, etc) in term of technology (read: quality, patents, performance, etc - not price, market share, image, etc).
In term of Quality, Korea is leading now. This is the prove:
Korean Brands Lead the Industry in New Car Quality
Fewer Problems Reported with New Vehicles in J.D. Power 2015 Initial Quality Study (IQS) | J.D. Power Cars
They even surpass Japanese car in term of quality, based on the problem score.
And how about Chinese car quality?
First of all, I could see that you are getting very emotional and getting quite personal with your very post.
Martian in his post merely pointed out that "
Samsung, LG, etc are all licensing OLED technology from America's Universal Display Company" and in my post I also stated that the
OLED technology is invented by Americans including one of Chinese ethnicity and you immediately jumped the wagon and turn racist in your comment. But those are facts and you can't deny it or can you?
In other words what Martian says about the technology being employed by South Korea is being licensed by a US Company is quite credulous since the Americans did indeed discovered the technology. That is why I says the patents by LG may be just related to the technologies and not OLED itself.
If that is not logical then I need to understand how logic work for you.
And other observation, you just love to put words into other people's mouth.
Example: "So you mean since OLED diode invented by chinese man working in Kodak, hence China must have mastered and excel in OLED panel technology manufacturing?"
Did I says any of this apart from the 10K Video Technology by BOE over the 4K by South Korea?
That is also why
I says Martian argument is credulous.
Did I ever brag about
Chinese Rocket Technology which is clearly way ahead of every other nations in ASIA today?
Since we are just confining to
South Korea and China in this discussion
why not stick to the topic.
LOL. Martian's bragging OLED invention by USA has nothing to do with comparison between China and Korea. It seems he only want to shield his and your shame because you guys cannot prove that China is on par with Korea in OLED technology, while I did.
Joke of the day
R&D in the commercial and private enterprise is all dictated by the company profitability. Hence without a substantial volume of business or orders, market share and profitability, it is almost impossible for these companies sustain or maintain this department in order for them to invest in new products.
If the business is down e.g. Sony. you may have some of the most brilliant engineers but they may soon leave you to join their counterpart elsewhere maybe in a factory or business owned by Chinese.
It would be long before many may be receiving a VSS or MSS in an unprofitable. So those patents you registered in the past will become the intangible assets and for sales.
So what is strong about your logic which to me is equally flawed.
LOLs .. LOLs.
Profitability indeed influence company's capability in R&D, but ..
Profitability is not the measurement of technology mastery at all.
Your logic really funny
