China mulling 'small scale military ops' against India: Media :

[rustom]

I think China trying to establish itself as a super power will try to assert itself by starting a localized military ops in Doklam. India should be ready with its own military mobilization to take on China.

What an opportunity for India to take back COK and disrupt OBOR.

 

[Dungeness]

When Indian Smart collides with Chinese Wisdom, let's see who comes out laughing. Interesting time ahead indeed.

 

[ashok321]

Yes, all Indians are with Modi except some traitors like you who wish the death of our own soldiers.

If your kind were ruling us then your leaders will *iss on seeing chinese and you guys will be licking the chinese feet asking pardon for being Indians.

We are not like you guys, we will fight to finish if the push come to a shove unlike traitors like you who rejoice the death of their own soldiers. Do you even rejoice, God forbid, the... I don't want to go further like you heartless traitors who have taken the goodwill of Hindus as weakness.

Nehru was a traitor too who started a war with China and in the process had many Indian soldiers killed.
The modern day traitor is Modi who wants to wage a war with China which is better placed (economically & militarily) than Modi's India with a revenue earning of less than Samsung:

https://twitter.com/x/status/852974748967587840

Shame on Modi with such attitude for votes.

Afraid of Chinese consequences, Modi does a U-Turn now a la GST & Adhaar:

Narendra Modi says dialogue is sole way to resolve conflicts

• India Wary of More Chinese Presence in Kashmir Through Dam Projects

A Moribund Mule (India) attracts more mosquitoes..

 

[Stephen Cohen]

Keep Mulling ; we are ready

 

[Akasa]

not able to understand conversation is a problem with the Chinese.

The arguement was on you saying what is stopping Chinese from aligning with Pakistan. My reply. Fear. You do not have the balls to do it, because you aligning with Pakistan officially with an agreement will result in an Asian Nato against China.

Now that I have simplified the reasoning, let me drill it in. You simply do not have the balls to get into a defence pact with Pakistan.

My example was a thought experiment to support my premise that India's move in Doklam was unilateral and one that could serve as a casus belli for a war.

You focused on an entirely irrelevant aspect of that argument, and frankly one in which your claim of China not having the courage to do so isn't grounded in anything factual. So, allow me to repeat my analogy for someone who prides himself in being able to "understand conversations": if China were to deploy troops to Kashmir in support of Pakistan, India would surely respond with its own military forces. The same parallel could be drawn in the Doklam standoff.

The question isn't whether China would sign a mutual defense pact with Pakistan (which wasn't even part of my analogy, if you haven't noticed), but rather whether India would respond with its own military pushback if the Chinese were to intervene in Kashmir.

Even if china deploys 100,000 troops and India matches it with 100,000 troops it is barely 10% of the forces of both countries. This really is not 1971.

Of course; nobody expects any potential conflict to be on the same scale as that between India and Pakistan in '71.

 

[ashok321]

China Disputes Indian Version of 2012 Understanding on Border Tri-junction

Senior Chinese diplomat also said that though Indian troops levels at the stand-off point are down to 40, “even if there is one single soldier in Doklam, that is a violation of Chinese territory and that is intolerable.”


Have you set a deadline for the withdrawal of Indian troops?

We don’t want to wait for another single day, single hour. Even one hour. We demand Indian troops to withdraw immediately. I am sure you understand the meaning of ‘immediately’ in English, Hindi or Chinese. I want to point that Indian side has an approach that is undisciplined, unreasonable and without any regard to consequences.

It is very risky and harmful to China’s interests. Indian side should rethink its approach, which does not have good impact on any country in the region.

I want to draw an analogy to the situation. What happened in Doklam is like you know somebody intruding the house of a neighbour and acting very wildly and staying there. After that he is asking for reciprocal withdrawal of both sides. So what India did is to turn a titled property of another person into a disputed or frozen property. So actually the owner of the property, the guy’s neighbour, is entitled to take any actions…

I just want to clarify one thing, you asked the deadline for consequences and you also mentioned the military action…. no such military action is mentioned in relation to serious consequences from the Chinese side.

But let me add something. On August 1, in the celebration of 90th anniversary of founding of PLA, President Xi Jinping said that there are many options available for China to safeguard peace, security… but the military option is the fundamental guarantee.

Did the Royal Bhutanese troops speak to the Chinese soldiers building road on June 16 and asked them to stop their construction activity?

What happened between China and Bhutan has nothing to do with India.

 

[Chhatrapati]

It is very risky and harmful to China’s interests. Indian side should rethink its approach, which does not have good impact on any country in the region.

India works to secure India's and it's allies interest. Not Chinese interest.

I want to draw an analogy to the situation. What happened in Doklam is like you know somebody intruding the house of a neighbour and acting very wildly and staying there. After that he is asking for reciprocal withdrawal of both sides. So what India did is to turn a titled property of another person into a disputed or frozen property. So actually the owner of the property, the guy’s neighbour, is entitled to take any actions…

I just want to clarify one thing, you asked the deadline for consequences and you also mentioned the military action…. no such military action is mentioned in relation to serious consequences from the Chinese side.

International disputes are not solved based on China's version of Map. As it follows the pattern like this "Ching Chong dynasty who ruled from xyz to xyz. Hence the region belongs to China"

Did the Royal Bhutanese troops speak to the Chinese soldiers building road on June 16 and asked them to stop their construction activity?

What happened between China and Bhutan has nothing to do with India.

Bhutanese soldiers asked for an Indian interventions. By doing so, they very well know the consequences. So, I don't think there is much to contemplate.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

You need to be happy that chinese are only good at warning and nothing else!!!

Not too bad. It was different from the mad provocation, the final failure, and then complained that “China was a sneak attack on India"

Arrogance needs strength support. Does India have the strength?

 

[desimorty]

you army tried to take back that barren land a year and after that nehru have to beg ceasefire and declare acceded land as dispued territory which is again Pakistan win..

Rest none of your ponit conflict what i wrote. If US was preparing us so was soviet on your side. Much of your army was not involved in 62 war. Not even air force.. So saying you were weak in 65 is total bs.

Look at the figures. 1965 Pakistan was closest to military par with India. After that the gap kept widening. Its true India started ramping up for war after 1962 but between 1962-1965 it received both American and Soviet help to do so. Which is why they did not fair well in the 1965 conflict as they were only just beginning to militarize. Not a lot of people would have imagined Pakistan would attack India. India was not weak in 1965 but Pakistan was at its strongest. So is was Kashmir ever the objective in these wars? 1965, Pakistan actually tried to take Delhi perhaps to butt of the Indian army or perhaps they really wanted to rule India. Whats weird is that a nation with a near fascist ideology of religion first, was supported by the west against the largest democracy. Cold war was indeed cold.

 

[salimpheku]

India works to secure India's and it's allies interest. Not Chinese interest.



International disputes are not solved based on China's version of Map. As it follows the pattern like this "Ching Chong dynasty who ruled from xyz to xyz. Hence the region belongs to China"


Bhutanese soldiers asked for an Indian interventions. By doing so, they very well know the consequences. So, I don't think there is much to contemplate.

Goes to show which country this "Indian" really belongs to, right?
This is the same guy who supported JNU b@stards who were celebrating deaths of our soldiers.

 

[PRC]

Not too bad. It was different from the mad provocation, the final failure, and then complained that “China was a sneak attack on India"

Arrogance needs strength support. Does India have the strength?

Why don't you find out? Does China has the courage to do so?

 

[Feng Leng]

All the assumptions are that China will attack.
if China attacks, what's stopping India from liberating Tibet?

How will China protect both Tibet in face of Indian onslaught as well as protect SCS?

Once we erase Delhi and Mumbai from the map, there will no longer be any "India" to threaten Asia peace.

 

[salimpheku]

Once we erase Delhi and Mumbai from the map, there will no longer be any "India" to threaten Asia peace.

And we will erase Beijing and Shanghai and may be Hong kong from the map.
How does that sound?

 

[SleeveofWizard]

And we will erase Beijing and Shanghai and may be Hong kong from the map.
How does that sound?

Relax, the Chinese just have manlet insecurity. Since they are so short, they try to look more aggressive. It is seen in animals too, not just humans. The smaller dogs bark the most, while the bigger dogs are mostly docile. The tall Sikhs and Jats are intimidating the little Chinese at the border, and the Chinese manlets are getting angry.

 

[Loafer]

Once we erase Delhi and Mumbai from the map, there will no longer be any "India" to threaten Asia peace.

By that time all Chinese would have converted to Islam otherwise this isn't possible.