China launches two destroyers with tech similar to US Navy’s Aegis system

[dani191]

WASHINGTON ― China has launched a pair of new destroyers on July 3 from their dry docks in Dalian, Liaoning province, which borders North Korea, according to Chinese media.

The vessels are designed for long-range air defense, anti-surface warfare and anti-submarine warfare.

The completed construction of the two destroyers, widely known as Type 055 vessels, contributes to the People’s Liberation Army Navy’s determined naval buildup.

The recently launched vessels are equipped with multifunction phased array radars similar to the U.S. Navy’s Aegis system and could accompany future carrier battle groups as China continues to expand its carrier program.

China’s ambitions for a blue-water navy are no secret. In November 2012, then-President Hu Jintao reported to the Chinese Communist Party Congress his desire to “enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resource ... and build China into a strong maritime power.”
https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2018/07/03/china-launches-two-destroyers/

 

[rashid.sarwar]

So the previous all ships are having tech inferior to US Navy’s Aegis system?

 

[dani191]

So the previous all ships are having tech inferior to US Navy’s Aegis system?

you can never know

 

[GodToons]

Either China is getting access to US tech by hook or crook, and they are designing exactly same stuff even when they do have exact technology. OR whole thing is bunkum.

 

[Beast]

So the previous all ships are having tech inferior to US Navy’s Aegis system?

American love to BS. This one is better not just equal. US AB detroyer are all PESA. While even previous Chinese destroyer are already AESA.

Either China is getting access to US tech by hook or crook, and they are designing exactly same stuff even when they do have exact technology. OR whole thing is bunkum.

No, Chinese innovate and invest heavily in R&D. This is just the fruit of our hard work.

 

[GodToons]

American love to BS. This one is better not just equal. US AB detroyer are all PESA. While even previous Chinese destroyer are already AESA.


No, Chinese innovate and invest heavily in R&D. This is just the fruit of our hard work.

Reason I question your point is, Chinese systems are NOT benchmarked to global standards while US systems have background and benchmarked which can be verified specially radars.
Some systems are obviously classified, but you are talking about radars. I have my doubts.

 

[dani191]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...itary-donald-trump-xi-jinping-technology-hack

American love to BS. This one is better not just equal. US AB detroyer are all PESA. While even previous Chinese destroyer are already AESA.


No, Chinese innovate and invest heavily in R&D. This is just the fruit of our hard work.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...itary-donald-trump-xi-jinping-technology-hack

 

[Beast]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...itary-donald-trump-xi-jinping-technology-hack

https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...itary-donald-trump-xi-jinping-technology-hack

Fancy you quote this kind of propangda source. If they claim the earth is cube. So you just believe without questioning?

 

[dani191]

Fancy you quote this kind of propangda source. If they claim the earth is cube. So you just believe without questioning?

yes

 

[T-123456]

American love to BS. This one is better not just equal. US AB detroyer are all PESA. While even previous Chinese destroyer are already AESA.


No, Chinese innovate and invest heavily in R&D. This is just the fruit of our hard work.

What are the specs of these ships?

 

[Beast]

Reason I question your point is, Chinese systems are NOT benchmarked to global standards while US systems have background and benchmarked which can be verified specially radars.
Some systems are obviously classified, but you are talking about radars. I have my doubts.

Who told you Chinese weapon are not benchmarked according to standard? American right? Their amount of hatre and jealousy is undescribable. American is good at making things up just to suit their own agenda agenda. Did you remember the BS of Saddam hussien WMD? End up is just all make up by American to trick their allies into supporting the invasion and give them excuse to steal oil.

I don't think I need to remind you of this. If an American word can be trusted. The earth will be cube.

What are the specs of these ships?

S-band all spectre frequency . AESA radar. AB destroyer are only PESA. It's a well known fact.

yes

There goes your credibility. Whatever you post is as good as junk.

 

[seesonic]

Reason I question your point is, Chinese systems are NOT benchmarked to global standards while US systems have background and benchmarked which can be verified specially radars.
Some systems are obviously classified, but you are talking about radars. I have my doubts.

So may i check with you how the India's navy fare by the so called "global standard"

 

[atan651]

yes

I thought your people are smart. I must be wrong.

 

[maxpayne]

Reason I question your point is, Chinese systems are NOT benchmarked to global standards while US systems have background and benchmarked which can be verified specially radars.
Some systems are obviously classified, but you are talking about radars. I have my doubts.

In many tech, China has already set benchmarks. It is a truth that most of the mil equip is not battle tested In like of US, but still this never disapprove quality of Chinese

 

[Indus Pakistan]

not battle tested

To be fair 90% of US systems/platforms are not battle tested either. The wars America has had in last few decades are against third world militaries or outfits like Taliban. The only thing tested in these wars is US infantry, light weapons, logistics etc.

How exactly has US Navy been tested in any of these wars? Indeed even USAF has not really been tested. Even then experiance and tested can only go so far. There was a time in early part of the last century when the most tested military was German. But it lost out against the numbers and greater industrial capacity of it's foes. Indeed US and Russia mostly copied German technology after WW2. The wheel does not always need reinventing.

As Chinese R&D surges and their industrial capacity reaches 3/4 times USA expect PLAN to support a fleet larger then USN and as if not more advanced. It's only matter of time. Maybe another four decades. There was a time when Royal Navy was dominant. Then greater US industrial productivity translated into USN gaining ascendancy. Around the corner PLAN is shaping up.