China Is Spying on RIMPAC

[Oldman1]

The difference is that we are not going to try to ram into it or stop in front of it unlike the Chinese whenever a U.S. ship is in their EEZ. Hopefully China will learn from that and accept it.

 

[gambit]

And the US? How to bomb rag heads with no means of defending themselves, you don't need to learn how to call in an air strike or a drone strike on a remote village on the suspected intel of a few rag heads hiding there.

Yes, considering how your PLAN had to modernize even to look like US.

The difference is that we are not going to try to ram into it or stop in front of it unlike the Chinese whenever a U.S. ship is in their EEZ. Hopefully China will learn from that and accept it.

Remember how that PLAAF pilot rammed his agile jet fighter into a lumbering four-engine prop jobber ? The PLAN is evolving away from ramming and instead how to use firearms. They will be observing how a real navy conduct naval warfare. Cut the Chinese members here some slack.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

Yes, considering how your PLAN had to modernize even to look like US.


Remember how that PLAAF pilot rammed his agile jet fighter into a lumbering four-engine prop jobber ? The PLAN is evolving away from ramming and instead how to use firearms. They will be observing how a real navy conduct naval warfare. Cut the Chinese members here some slack.

You hit below the belt buddy....

 

[sincity]

Yes, considering how your PLAN had to modernize even to look like US.


Remember how that PLAAF pilot rammed his agile jet fighter into a lumbering four-engine prop jobber ? The PLAN is evolving away from ramming and instead how to use firearms. They will be observing how a real navy conduct naval warfare. Cut the Chinese members here some slack.

China fighter jet had the ball clipped US surveillance aircraft, China wouldn't risk a war with US in other to bring down US spy aircraft. China served notice to the US spy on China and intruded on China airspace can lead to deadly accident. Spy on China would be met with the deadly respond.

 

[gambit]

China fighter jet had the ball clipped US surveillance aircraft, China wouldn't risk a war with US in other to bring down US spy aircraft. China served notice to the US spy on China and intruded on China airspace can lead to deadly accident. Spy on China would be met with the deadly respond.

The US surveillance flight WAS NOT in Chinese airspace.

 

[Penguin]

With U.S there is no such thing call gesture of good faith especially that we're labeled by American as strategical competitor, between China-US only interest count there is no friendship nor morality, we Chineses have learn that from Americans.

Indeed. However, if only interests count, don't go for the moral upper hand with 'what you ve learned'. Even if you came down to their lever, you are still now at that (same) level.

Listening to what is available is not spying, it is intelligence gathering. Big difference imho.