What's new

China is creating a new conventional super bomb

. . .
It is powerful enough to create some mini earthquakes, and I wonder this bomb gonna couple with the DF-ZF HGV for the pinpoint accuracy strike?

曝中国正测试超级炸弹 威力大到引发小地震-20151205火线军情-凤凰视频-最具媒体品质的综合视频门户-凤凰网
I really hope China does this Pakistan also needs to develop a warhead which cane be fired from missiles and is massively destructive but not nuclear one that would be real answer to India's cold start doctrine
 
.
I really hope China does this Pakistan also needs to develop a warhead which cane be fired from missiles and is massively destructive but not nuclear one that would be real answer to India's cold start doctrine

This new conventional warhead is almost as powerful as the nuke, but it has very low barrier for using in the battlefield, unlike the nuke.
 
. . . .
I really hope China does this Pakistan also needs to develop a warhead which cane be fired from missiles and is massively destructive but not nuclear one that would be real answer to India's cold start doctrine
We need Thermobaric warhead for short range missile with huge payload capacity.
 
.
It was not specified, but I guess it should be equivalent to a tactical nuke.

Tactical nukes cover a massive range of explosive power from like a dozen tons of yield up to 5 kiloton or even more.

US conventional MOAB "Mother of all bombs" has a yield of 11 tons of TNT. Compare this to the david crockett nuclear "grenade" of very similar yield.

GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Davy Crockett (nuclear device) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

10,000 kg mass versus about 50 kg mass. Think of the effects on the range of the carrier system.

It is tough to get conventional bombs into the main range of tactical nukes without making them immensely large and cumbersome to transport and deliver (given their magnitudes lower energy density derived from chemical energy).
 
Last edited:
.
This new conventional warhead is almost as powerful as the nuke, but it has very low barrier for using in the battlefield, unlike the nuke.

Conventional Weapons rely on breaking of chemical bonds.

Nuclear weapons go one whole level deeper, and work at the nuclear level, breaking up of nucleus.

The scale is just all together different. No conventional weapon can match the capability of nukes, with anything close to its size.

As pointed by @Nilgiri , the most powerful conventional bombs, weighing many kilotons, have an explosive power equivalent to only the smallest tactical nuclear weapons, weighing some kilograms.

Also, the DF ZF, is no where near to a nuclear weapon, because it would either be a kinetic weapon, or a dual, kinetic + explosive weapon, and none of this can come anywhere near to a decent size tactical nuclear weapon, in the respect of net energy delivered against the target.
 
.
I really hope China does this Pakistan also needs to develop a warhead which cane be fired from missiles and is massively destructive but not nuclear one that would be real answer to India's cold start doctrine

Beta cold start thoo dur ki baat sirf uske naam say tum logon ki halat kay bataya.... Us ko rok na ka liya kitna nuksan ootana padraha hey

karch karo miya hum log wahi chata hey
 
.
It was not specified, but I guess it should be equivalent to a tactical nuke.
tac nukes have the capability to cause an earthquake as the title of this video says. Even a very small tac nuke can havean explosive yield equivalent to 72 tons of TNT.
But hey China follows a no first use policy like India. So should we be worried? :)
 
.
Beta cold start thoo dur ki baat sirf uske naam say tum logon ki halat kay bataya.... Us ko rok na ka liya kitna nuksan ootana padraha hey

karch karo miya hum log wahi chata hey
Your cold start is a failure and still want to try it we are more than please to answer
 
.
Your cold start is a failure and still want to try it we are more than please to answer

Its serving a purpose and that's a great success if you understand Global Use of Force.....

You would Know how a Quarantine Diffused the Cuban Missile crisis some intentions are enough to carry the message, It need not be a bravado, JFK showed the intentions to Soviets and that was enough.......

We have done more than Intention actually but I will not like to spell it
 
.
Back
Top Bottom