Solomon2
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 19,475
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Yes. But will China choose to keep it that way, or throw the table as Europe did in WWI? European leaders also thought of themselves as wise!1、Completely different, ww1、2 time world or rule of colonial empires, the world is divided, if I want to get your stuff, only to go to war. That is not the same and today, all countries are independent, although not perfect, but each country has its own sovereignty in general, they are able to choose their own best way. Development of economic globalization, make power do not need to rely on the war to get what you want, or the comparative costs of war are greatly enhanced. This is completely different with ago...China's economic development needs a peaceful and stable environment, so I think China will wise enough to treat the problem.
Thank you for the correction.Kashgar is not too distant from China's western development strategy and border stability, and that there is a big concern of Chinese leaders. About Chongqing,There is a port , but has no major component in international trade, because he is just a western mountain town. Moreover, now industry is shifting from the eastern to central and western, that all cities with a full competition to provide a superior investment environment, this is no problem, inland regions have a better and more open economic policies.
Question is, does China think it is worth a war? You are asking me whether it is worth it for other countries to go to war to prevent China from pushing the boundaries of the current international system.I do not know how you feel, but any way, it is worth a war? Do you really think so?
We'll see. A lot depends on China's actions. Perhaps other nations should be more pro-active to discourage China? But that would smack of an encircling coalition against China, and I don't think that is merited - not yet, anyway.