What's new

China Hong Kong SAR: News and Images

Violence breaks out at HK protests as police use pepper spray on demonstrators
opA7m80.jpg

Take it "TRAITORS" taste good?
Just send those sycophants to UK.
I am fed up with those pussies.
 
. .
Just send those sycophants to UK.
I am fed up with those pussies.

Is all well bro, this should the last struggle of those US backed NSG paid traitors running DOGS
Jpzw523.jpg

十二屆全國人大常委會第二十四次會議今早經表決,全票通過《全國人大常委會關於香港特別行政區基本法第一百零四條的解釋》。

《基本法》第104條全文如下「香港特別行政區行政長官、主要官員、行政會議成員、立法會議員、各級法院法官和其他司法人員在就職時必須依法宣誓擁護中華人民共和國香港特別行政區基本法,效忠中華人民共和國香港特別行政區。」

青年新政立法會議員游蕙禎、梁頌恆宣誓引起連串風波,首先引發港府就二人宣誓提出司法覆核,其後全國人大委員長主動要求人大常委會針對《基本法》第104條釋法。身兼基本法委員會委員的港區全國人大代表譚惠珠早前表示,今次釋法非由港府或特首提出,相信是基於國家統一及領土完整等重要課題,人大常委會才主動提出釋法。

全國人大常委會上午10時會在人民大會堂召開記者會,說明表決的內容。
http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20161107/bkn-20161107092122704-1107_00822_001.html
 
.
Is all well bro, this should the last struggle of those US backed NSG paid traitors running DOGS
Jpzw523.jpg

十二屆全國人大常委會第二十四次會議今早經表決,全票通過《全國人大常委會關於香港特別行政區基本法第一百零四條的解釋》。

《基本法》第104條全文如下「香港特別行政區行政長官、主要官員、行政會議成員、立法會議員、各級法院法官和其他司法人員在就職時必須依法宣誓擁護中華人民共和國香港特別行政區基本法,效忠中華人民共和國香港特別行政區。」

青年新政立法會議員游蕙禎、梁頌恆宣誓引起連串風波,首先引發港府就二人宣誓提出司法覆核,其後全國人大委員長主動要求人大常委會針對《基本法》第104條釋法。身兼基本法委員會委員的港區全國人大代表譚惠珠早前表示,今次釋法非由港府或特首提出,相信是基於國家統一及領土完整等重要課題,人大常委會才主動提出釋法。

全國人大常委會上午10時會在人民大會堂召開記者會,說明表決的內容。
http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20161107/bkn-20161107092122704-1107_00822_001.html
:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::china::china::china::china:
 
.
The 3 main points: 釋法三要點 宣誓後再搞港獨將失議員資格
vUyBKyN.jpg

全國人大常委會今早全票通過對《基本法》104條的法律解釋表決議案。(何天成攝)


全國人大常委會今早全票通過對《基本法》104條的法律解釋表決議案,人大代表廖長江於北京會見傳媒,交代人大釋法原因及內容。

他透露有3點法律解釋:


第一,宣誓必須擁護《基本法》及效忠中華人民共和國香港特別行政區並不單是法定內容,而是參選及出任104條所列公職的法定要求及條件。


第二,「依法宣誓」是指必須符合法定形式及內容,需要真誠、莊重進行宣誓,亦要準確、完確及莊重宣讀有效誓言。若然宣誓人拒絕宣誓,便立刻喪失當應公職的資格;若故意宣讀不一致的誓詞,或以任何不莊重的宣誓方式,亦等同拒絕宣誓,不能再獲宣誓機會。


第三,宣誓必須在法定監誓人面前進行,而監誓人有權去確保宣誓是合法及莊重下進行,亦有權作出宣誓有效與否的裁定。而宣誓具有法律效力及法律約束力,若宣誓人有虛假宣誓,以及宣誓後有違誓行為,均需依法承擔法律責任,即議員宣誓後再搞港獨,其議員資格亦會被撤銷。

They're dead meat from now on

 
.
This protest rally story seems to only be reported by biased "Eastern" Press so it probably isn't legit. Plus nobody trusts RT as it is probably fake staged footage.
Only delusional people ,missing the glory of.British empire ,will suck on such petty demonstration.

Some guys just can not control themselves to dig out anglophile ,they do need some placebo.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
Angry crowd demands Youngspiration oath pair quit Hong Kong Legco

Businessmen, politicians, and anti-Japanese occupation fighters join coachloads of angry protesters to decry China slurs in chamber


PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 26 October, 2016, 11:18pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 27 October, 2016, 12:29pm

3244487c-9b5f-11e6-9654-6e2b0a6d20cd_1280x720.jpg


Thousands of protesters, politicians and community and business leaders occupied the public square outside the Legislative Council complex yesterday to condemn two Youngspiration lawmakers for anti-Chinese slurs during their members’ oaths.

Chinese flags and banners branding the pair “traitors” and “scum” fringed the pavements leading to the entrance of the Admiralty building. Coachloads of protesters – mostly old people – descended, while others flooded in from the nearby MTR station, waving placards with slogans demanding Sixtus Baggio Leung Chung-hang and Yau Wai-ching be “thrown out of the Legco”.

The organisers – a group of 25 pro-Beijing parties and community and business groups calling itself the Anti-China-Insulting, Anti-Hong Kong Independence Alliance – said more than 10,000 people joined it. Police estimated the crowd peaked at 8,720.

During their Legco pledges on October 12, Leung and Yau swore allegiance to “the Hong Kong nation” and pronounced China as “Chee-na”, similar to the derogatory Shina used by the Japanese during wartime. Despite outcry, the pair refused to apologise.



Emotions remained high throughout yesterday’s rally as community leaders and politicians took turns to condemn the pair onstage. Among them was Hong Kong business magnate Allan Zeman, chairman of Lan Kwai Fong Holdings, who urged the crowds to “say no to these two young people”.

National People’s Congress delegate Maria Tam Wai-chu also addressed the protesters and said: “They were voted in by their voters, but did the voters expect them to say such derogatory things about the Chinese?”

Also there were 20 representatives of the former guerrilla squads East River Column and Kowloon Independent Brigade, that fought Japanese troops during the second world war.

Kevin Ng, in his 40s, a company driver whose grandfather was a squad member, said: “I think the two [localists] have gone too far. My grandfather fought for Hong Kong against the Japanese. I can’t allow anyone to use dirty words to insult Chinese and Hongkongers.”

Emerging from a sea of elderly protesters was former anti-Occupy student activist Ashley Tse Hiu-hung, 25, who said: “I came because I want to tell Leung and Yau that they can’t represent us young people.”

Alliance spokesman Stanley Ng Chau-pei said: “The huge turnout is solid proof of public discontent with Leung and Yau. They should be thrown out of Legco. There is no place in Legco for those who insult Chinese people.”

In the evening, 50 supporters of the Youngspiration lawmakers staged a sit-in outside Legco to denounce what they called a trampling on separation of powers.

A number of pan-democrats, including Nathan Law Kwun-chung, of Demosisto, and Eddie Chu Hoi-dick also turned up.

Among those in the audience was Hung Siu-fai, 21, a physics student from the University of Science and Technology. She expressed reservations about the pair’s behaviour during the oaths, but said: “What I can’t tolerate is the procedural violence of the pro-establishment camp.”

Additional reporting by Raymond Yeung and Peace Chiu


This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as:
Crowd demands oath pair quit Legco

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...youngspiration-oath-pair-quit-hong-kong-legco

The "Real Voice" of Hong Kong people :china::smitten:
 
. .
Hong Kong pro-democracy politicians banned by China as crisis grows

Hong Kong is facing a severe political crisis after China barred two pro-independence politicians from the city’s legislature.

In a highly controversial move, Beijing said Yau Wai-ching and Sixtus “Baggio” Leung would not be able to hold office, striking a blow to the burgeoning movement calling for greater autonomy from the mainland.

The ruling, which amounts to Beijing’s most direct intervention in the territory’s legal system since the 1997 handover to Chinese rule, is expected to spark renewed street protests in the former British colony.


0:00

Facebook Twitter Pinterest
Hong Kong politicians defy China as they are sworn in
During a chaotic swearing-in ceremony last month, Yau and Leung thumbed their noses at Beijing by refusing to declare their allegiance to China and carrying blue flags reading: “Hong Kong is not China.”

The pair’s oaths are invalid and they will not be able to retake them, China’s rubberstamp legislature said, one day after thousands marched through the streets of Hong Kong to protest against Beijing’s interference.

Those wishing to hold public office must “sincerely and solemnly” declare allegiance to China, it said.

Legislators must swear allegiance to “the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China”, according to the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution.

“Since the legislative council elections, some people have been advocating independence and saying they want to do it in Legco,” Li Fei, the chairman of the Basic Law committee at China’s parliament, said at a press conference announcing the decision. “The interpretation today will help to defend national unity and sovereignty.”

Any calls for “self-determination” amounted to advocating for independence, with both standing at odds with the Basic Law, Li added. He warned allowing independence talk to go unchecked would harm territorial integrity, national security and competitiveness.

This is the beginning of the end of Hong Kong
Claudia Mo
Read more
The Chinese government “is determined to firmly confront the pro-independence forces without any ambiguity,” he added.

The decision in unlikely to silence calls in Hong Kong for greater autonomy and independence

Emily Lau, a veteran member of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy camp, said Beijing had decided to intervene because it feared the spread of independence to regions such as Tibet and Xinjiang where there is longstanding resistance to the Communist party’s rule.

Lau, the chairwoman of Hong Kong’s Democratic party, said that by preventing Leung and Yau from taking up their seats Beijing hoped to nip Hong Kong’s independence movement in the bud.
“But you can’t nip it because there are many students in secondary schools and in universities who support the idea,” she said. “So what Beijing should be asking is not so much, ‘How do we get rid of it?’ It is, ‘How come our young people – and even those who are not so young – how come they advocate [independence]?’”

app
Download the free Guardian app
Download the free Guardian app
Specially crafted for Windows 10, this app gives you full access to the Guardian's award-winning content. With automatic caching, you can keep reading even when you’re offline.
Click here
“That is the way of solving the problem, not trying to suppress it. Because the harder you suppress, the more they will rise up,” she added.

Eddie Chu, a pro-democracy politician, said Beijing’s intervention would only fuel greater opposition from young people who were increasingly disillusioned with its rule.

“Every time Beijing tries to use legal instruments to stop Hong Kong people seeking democracy, the opposite will happen. More people, in particular young people, will be more determined in thinking about breaking through the restrictions set by Beijing,” Chu said. “The thoughts of the young people have changed a lot in these few years and I don’t think this interpretation will deter them from seeking self-determination. Quite the opposite.”

Chu said the ruling was the latest example of Beijing’s meddling in what he described as Hong Kong’s internal affairs. “It is like something happening on another planet - but it will have serious consequences for us,” he warned.

However, pro-China voices welcomed the ruling.


Holden Chow, one of the rising stars of Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing camp, said he backed the central government’s “tough decision” to disqualify Yau and Leung from the legislative council, a move he claimed many in the former colony would welcome.

Chow, a politician from Hong Kong’s largest pro-Beijing party, the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), said there was no place for such voices in the legislature. Beijing’s rare intervention would serve as a warning to all of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy politicians “not to carry on with advocating independence or self-determination”.

“Their behaviour was blatant and notorious,” he said of Yau and Leung. “When they took their oaths they used derogatory words to insult Chinese people and have been bluntly advocating the independence of Hong Kong.”

“Hong Kong is indeed part of China,” Chow added. “If you deny that, why would you participate in the legislative chamber? Why would you insist on having a seat? … Obviously, without their presence it will be better.”

Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protests have been overwhelmingly peaceful but Chow said he feared that “some of the radicals” would stage “violent protests” in response to the decision.


'Festering pustules': the two pro-democracy activists who are targets of China's wrath
Read more
After the UK handed Hong Kong to China in 1997, the city maintained its own laws, courts and freedoms not enjoyed in mainland China, under a framework known as “one country, two systems”.

But many in Hong Kong complain those freedoms have been eroded in recent years, leading to nearly three months of street protests in 2014 – known as the umbrella revolution – and to the election in September this year of six politicians pushing for greater autonomy for the city.

Advertisement

On Monday the UK expressed concern at Beijing’s latest move. “We urge the Chinese and Hong Kong SAR Governments, and all elected politicians in Hong Kong to refrain from any actions that fuel concerns or undermine confidence in the “one country, two systems” principle,” a foreign office spokeswoman told Reuters.

“Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability depends on its successful implementation, as provided for by the joint declaration and basic law,” she said.

About 13,000 marched on Sunday to protest against China’s intervention, ending in clashes with police outside Beijing’s main presence in the city and four arrests.

China’s move to bar the two young legislators sets up a new battle between pro-Beijing and pro-democracy camps as a fresh round of elections will be held to replace Leung and Yau.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ong-pro-independence-politicians-crisis-grows
 
.
Sorry to disappoint you, those US NGO backed criminals were all crushed before the they able to see the sunlight next morning, try getting your orgasm next time perhaps?:rofl:

6EcE1Q8.jpg

Crushed like ants:china::yahoo:

khN0P2W.jpg
VTJKTTy.jpg
kFxnS3y.jpg

happy now?:smitten:

Sq9M8fp.jpg
32d8VCP.jpg

Say hi to the HK police, "TRAITORS :china:

In HK, the most despised creatures are those "white hearted wannabe" like .......guess we got a textbook example right here :pleasantry:

Violence breaks out at HK protests as police use pepper spray on demonstrators
opA7m80.jpg

Take it "TRAITORS" taste good?

Just send those sycophants to UK.
I am fed up with those pussies.

Did the United States not have a shooting case recently?
177528.jpg


Be safe @Chinese-Dragon , is @Genesis also from Hong Kong?
 
. .
If i were you, i would more worried about your "FAKED INDIAN ASYLUM SEEKERS" natural born criminals bros for committing organized crimes on a daily basis, the rioters HATE anything that ain't white, does "curry bashing" from Australia ring a bell?:azn:

I am worried about safety of the people of Hong Kong, not interested in measuring 'more or less'...
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom