China exported the Mach-4 CM400 anti-ship missile to Pakistan

[gambit]

Barak 8 is Mach 2 so it cannot intercept.

Post 30 is correct.

 

[khanasifm]

 

[Rashid Mahmood]

Pic is from 2014. 10-115 was in china back then. Block-2 weapon testing and integration was done on this platform.



Have you seen PAF JF-17 carrying CM-400 AKG missiles inside Pakistan ever ? Or PAF acknowledging that they have purchased CM-400 AKG ? No. So that answers your question

Just a question.
Why did PAF carry out this weapon testing and integration on a PAF JF 17 for another customer.

As per my experience, any country would not conduct testing & integration of any weapon system for a another country, whatsoever. It involves many risks. CM-400 isn't even our product, so testing it on a PAF JF 17 has no justification, unless PAF tested it for it's own use and due to some reason, we still have not acquired this weapon.

PAF announced the induction of RAAD pretty late after it's actual induction.

Wikipedia, however shows:


Armament

• Guns: 1× 23 mm GSh-23-2 twin-barrel cannon
• Hardpoints: 7 in total (4 × under-wing, 2 × wing-tip, 1 × under-fuselage) with a capacity of 9,535 lb (4,325 kg) for external fuel and ordnance
• Missiles:
  • Air-to-air missiles:
    • PL-5EII (Short-range)
    • SD-10A (Beyond visual range) [190]
  • Air-to-surface missiles:
    • CM-102 Anti-radiation missile [190]
    • C-802AK Anti-ship missile [190][191]
    • CM-400AKG Anti-ship missile [191]

 

[Khanate]

another customer

Indeed, "another customer".

 

[Rashid Mahmood]

Indeed, "another customer".

Which "another customer" will operate a JF-17 and equip it with a CM-400.

 

[mkiyani]

i am confused do Pakistan has CM 400AKG or not... i pray we do have it.. any senior member with info or contacts could tell us if we have it or not.. thanks

 

[Bratva]

Just a question.
Why did PAF carry out this weapon testing and integration on a PAF JF 17 for another customer.

As per my experience, any country would not conduct testing & integration of any weapon system for a another country, whatsoever. It involves many risks. CM-400 isn't even our product, so testing it on a PAF JF 17 has no justification, unless PAF tested it for it's own use and due to some reason, we still have not acquired this weapon.

PAF announced the induction of RAAD pretty late after it's actual induction.

Wikipedia, however shows:


Armament

• Guns: 1× 23 mm GSh-23-2 twin-barrel cannon
• Hardpoints: 7 in total (4 × under-wing, 2 × wing-tip, 1 × under-fuselage) with a capacity of 9,535 lb (4,325 kg) for external fuel and ordnance
• Missiles:
  • Air-to-air missiles:
    • PL-5EII (Short-range)
    • SD-10A (Beyond visual range) [190]
  • Air-to-surface missiles:
    • CM-102 Anti-radiation missile [190]
    • C-802AK Anti-ship missile [190][191]
    • CM-400AKG Anti-ship missile [191]

Myanmar or Burma Requested the CM-400 AKG if we have to believe the rumors

As far as the Integration of CM-400 on 10-115. I'm just qouting what Project Director said to AFM or ALAN warnes in his interview that Pakistan doesnt have an operational requirement of CM-400. So I concur with your bold line,

Logically speaking have you seen any CM-400 on any of JF-17 promotional videos? If PAF had it in its inventory, it would not have had missed a chance to show case it. Just like everyone believed JF-17 has WMD-7 which it turns out PAF never bought a single WMD-7 ever.

Integrated but never bought up-till now. Only PAF can explain why they deem CM-400 not suitable for their operational requirements.

 

[Men in Green]

Myanmar or Burma Requested the CM-400 AKG if we have to believe the rumors

As far as the Integration of CM-400 on 10-115. I'm just qouting what Project Director said to AFM or ALAN warnes in his interview that Pakistan doesnt have an operational requirement of CM-400. So I concur with your bold line,

Logically speaking have you seen any CM-400 on any of JF-17 promotional videos? If PAF had it in its inventory, it would not have had missed a chance to show case it. Just like everyone believed JF-17 has WMD-7 which it turns out PAF never bought a single WMD-7 ever.

Integrated but never bough uptill now. Only PAF can explain why they deem CM-400 not suitable for their operational requirements.

Myanmar / Burma is same country you really have no idea what you are talking about.

Interview you are talking about is old and this news is fresh. so keep your shit with u.... you aren't spoke person of PAF nor Air Chief.

They tested on JF 17 isn't this enough proof.

 

[Akasa]

C
M-400 is far far more advanced than india's bhramos whatever missile:

It travels much faster (Mach-4) and similar range (300km range limited by international pact, can be extended to much more), and much compactly design than bromos.

Each FC-1 can carry 2 CM-400 missiles, whilst the much heavier Su-30MKI can only carry a single bhramos whatever.

CM-400 launching:

Two CM-400 carried by PAF's FC-1:

CM-400 in airshow:

Source:
http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/k/slide_8_38692_61080.html#p=1

Don't be ridiculous. The BrahMos and the CM-400AKG are two different types of missiles, the former being a sea-skimming supersonic cruise missile and the CM-400AKG a high-altitude hypersonic air-to-surface weapon that dives towards its target.

The BrahMos is a primarily anti-ship platform with a secondary land attack capability whereas the CM-400AKG is designed to attack fixed or slow-moving land targets. There is little evidence that the CM-400AKG has an anti-ship role. The differences between the two doesn't stop there, but due to the ridiculousness of this discussion I won't delve further.

The closest Chinese counterpart to the BrahMos would be the CX-1 or perhaps export versions of the YJ-12 (CM-302 I think).

 

[Arsalan 345]

I have no idea.if we have this missile,it is good.sometimes you deny this kind of news just to confuse your enemy.

 

[mzeeshanfahd]

Which "another customer" will operate a JF-17 and equip it with a CM-400.

my guess .... indonesia

 

[Chhatrapati]

Israelis can be anything but fools!! They won't give anything to India that might terminally threaten China, which might very much be their next Zion!!!

You think those missiles miss the target when fired against the Chinese?

Same would be true for Russians too, they would never harm their Chinese bros that's why they are not co-developing Brahmos with India. Oh, wait.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

You think those missiles miss the target when fired against the Chinese?

Same would be true for Russians too, they would never harm their Chinese bros that's why they are not co-developing Brahmos with India. Oh, wait.

He is right, all Israeli weapons to India come with tag "Do not use on China" and we Indians comply

 

[RPK]

Barak 8 is Mach 2 so it cannot intercept.

How about bringing down JF17 itself

 

[BHarwana]

How about bringing down JF17 itself

How will you do that. JF-17 can take out Barak-8 with out even getting in range of the Radar detection of Barak-8 Sorry the stand off range of Jf-17 is higher than the Radar detection Range of Barak-8.