China donates 1,000 firefighting motorcycles to Bangladesh

[Black_cats]

all these claims are based on answers of one side and many of them are untrue. this case is that simple what people think. here is some parts of an article reported by Nytime.

The Rohingya Suffer Real Horrors. So Why Are Some of Their Stories Untrue?

LEDA, Bangladesh — The four young sisters sat in a huddle, together but alone.

Their accounts were dramatic: Their mother had died when their home was burned by soldiers in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. Their father was one of thousands of Rohingya Muslims who had disappeared into official custody and were feared dead.

Somehow, the sisters — ages 12, 8, 5 and 2 — made their way to refuge in Bangladesh. An uncle, who had been living for years in the Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh, had taken them in, adding the girls to his own collection of hungry children.

“My parents were killed in Myanmar,” said the eldest girl, Januka Begum. “I miss them very much.”

I was reporting on children who had arrived in the camps without their families. An international charity, which had given financial support to the uncle, brought me to meet the girls.

Within an hour, I had a notebook filled with the kind of quotes that pull at heartstrings. Little of it was true.


After three days of reporting, the truth began to emerge. Soyud Hossain, the supposed uncle who had taken the girls in, was actually their father. He had three wives, two in Bangladesh and one in Myanmar, he admitted. The children were from his youngest wife, the one in Myanmar.

In any refugee camp, tragedy is commodified. Aid groups want to help the neediest cases, and people quickly realize that the story of four orphaned sisters holds more value than that of an intact family that merely lost all its possessions.

To compete for relief supplies distributed by aid groups, refugees learn to deploy women with infants in their arms. Crying babies get pushed to the front of the line.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


For four days, I interviewed a 9-year-old boy named Noorshad, and his story had it all. In my notebook, he drew pictures of his house — and the tree from which his parents were hanged by Myanmar soldiers.

Then he drew the jerrycan he clung to as he crossed the river into Bangladesh. He tied his flip-flops to his waist, he said, with a bit of vine. The sandals were from his dead mother. He glanced at them and sobbed.

But there were inconsistencies. Noorshad said he liked cricket, a sport popular in Bangladesh but not in Myanmar. His grandparents were killed by the military, he told me, but then he admitted they had died of natural causes.

I found locals from the village I believed he was from. It turned out that no one had been killed there, much less hanged from a tree.

So where did Noorshad come from? He had been found crying in the market in the Kutupalong refugee camp. Other refugees took him to a school where a pair of women offered hugs and bowls of curry. Obviously, something bad had happened to him, but to this day, no one has figured out his real story.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At times, there is a benign explanation for children telling untruths. Young minds can process lived memories and secondhand ones in remarkably similar ways.

“Even if some children have only heard of atrocities, fear has been instilled in them and it’s very hard for them to separate what they’ve seen from what they’ve heard,” said Benjamin Steinlechner, a spokesman for the United Nations Children’s Fund in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. “It’s like watching a horror movie. Children experience it very differently from adults.”

I have a better sense of the life of Mr. Hossain, the four girls’ father.

His troubles, he said, began when he was briefly back in Myanmar and saw a 12-year-old girl with fair skin and delicate features.

“She was so beautiful,” Mr. Hossain said. “I needed to marry her.”

Child marriage is distressingly common among the Rohingya, and soon, Mr. Hossain began shuttling among his three wives. Not every wife knew about the other, but Mr. Hossain didn’t think three wives were too many. His own father, he said, had six wives and 42 children.

Yet Mr. Hossain admitted that he was not adept at balancing family relations. When his four daughters sought shelter in Bangladesh after their village had been burned, Sajida, the wife with whom he has been living in the Leda refugee camp, was furious.

“My husband is a bad man,” she announced, after she finally admitted the girls’ true provenance. “I am tired of all his lies.”

Later, when I reached Mr. Hossain by phone, he was seething.

“I beat her when you left,” he said. “I will beat her again tomorrow.”

Mr. Hossain’s sister-in-law had also explained part of the family’s complicated truth. A neighbor later relayed that her candor had earned her a beating from her husband.



Rather than highlight the plight of unaccompanied minors, my reporting had catalyzed domestic violence in two households. I regretted the days of questioning Ms. Sajida, who goes by one name.

I had found her unsympathetic when she said she wished those girls would disappear back to Myanmar. But that night her husband would beat her. As I stood and judged her for not embracing these four girls from her husband’s youngest wife, a cockroach skittered across the floor. A rat followed.

Ms. Sajida began crying.

All around, through the bamboo slats that make up the walls of a Rohingya shelter, children’s eyes followed my movements, wondering what I was doing there and why I had made a grown woman weep.

=====================================================================
It is well known that many asylum seekers fabricate and embellish their claims in the hope of having their claims accepted.

So we are starting an international committee which includes many foreign experts and officials from middle like Japan to handle such a claim whether they are true or not. In this regards , China is understanding this and support our move. So BD also should cooperate with us if u guys genuinely want to solve this. it will also help to accelerate the repatriation of these people. if not , all u can do is just opening multiple threads to curse Myanmar and China here.


We allowed many media many times to go that area if u dont blind , we will see it. UN is under controlled by western powers. why we should allow them to prove their claim. ? They accused , then the organizations controlled by them will prove their claims as they want. many cases happened..

all these claims are based on answers of one side and many of them are untrue. this case is that simple what people think. here is some parts of an article reported by Nytime.

The Rohingya Suffer Real Horrors. So Why Are Some of Their Stories Untrue?

LEDA, Bangladesh — The four young sisters sat in a huddle, together but alone.

Their accounts were dramatic: Their mother had died when their home was burned by soldiers in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. Their father was one of thousands of Rohingya Muslims who had disappeared into official custody and were feared dead.

Somehow, the sisters — ages 12, 8, 5 and 2 — made their way to refuge in Bangladesh. An uncle, who had been living for years in the Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh, had taken them in, adding the girls to his own collection of hungry children.

“My parents were killed in Myanmar,” said the eldest girl, Januka Begum. “I miss them very much.”

I was reporting on children who had arrived in the camps without their families. An international charity, which had given financial support to the uncle, brought me to meet the girls.

Within an hour, I had a notebook filled with the kind of quotes that pull at heartstrings. Little of it was true.


After three days of reporting, the truth began to emerge. Soyud Hossain, the supposed uncle who had taken the girls in, was actually their father. He had three wives, two in Bangladesh and one in Myanmar, he admitted. The children were from his youngest wife, the one in Myanmar.

In any refugee camp, tragedy is commodified. Aid groups want to help the neediest cases, and people quickly realize that the story of four orphaned sisters holds more value than that of an intact family that merely lost all its possessions.

To compete for relief supplies distributed by aid groups, refugees learn to deploy women with infants in their arms. Crying babies get pushed to the front of the line.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


For four days, I interviewed a 9-year-old boy named Noorshad, and his story had it all. In my notebook, he drew pictures of his house — and the tree from which his parents were hanged by Myanmar soldiers.

Then he drew the jerrycan he clung to as he crossed the river into Bangladesh. He tied his flip-flops to his waist, he said, with a bit of vine. The sandals were from his dead mother. He glanced at them and sobbed.

But there were inconsistencies. Noorshad said he liked cricket, a sport popular in Bangladesh but not in Myanmar. His grandparents were killed by the military, he told me, but then he admitted they had died of natural causes.

I found locals from the village I believed he was from. It turned out that no one had been killed there, much less hanged from a tree.

So where did Noorshad come from? He had been found crying in the market in the Kutupalong refugee camp. Other refugees took him to a school where a pair of women offered hugs and bowls of curry. Obviously, something bad had happened to him, but to this day, no one has figured out his real story.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At times, there is a benign explanation for children telling untruths. Young minds can process lived memories and secondhand ones in remarkably similar ways.

“Even if some children have only heard of atrocities, fear has been instilled in them and it’s very hard for them to separate what they’ve seen from what they’ve heard,” said Benjamin Steinlechner, a spokesman for the United Nations Children’s Fund in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. “It’s like watching a horror movie. Children experience it very differently from adults.”

I have a better sense of the life of Mr. Hossain, the four girls’ father.

His troubles, he said, began when he was briefly back in Myanmar and saw a 12-year-old girl with fair skin and delicate features.

“She was so beautiful,” Mr. Hossain said. “I needed to marry her.”

Child marriage is distressingly common among the Rohingya, and soon, Mr. Hossain began shuttling among his three wives. Not every wife knew about the other, but Mr. Hossain didn’t think three wives were too many. His own father, he said, had six wives and 42 children.

Yet Mr. Hossain admitted that he was not adept at balancing family relations. When his four daughters sought shelter in Bangladesh after their village had been burned, Sajida, the wife with whom he has been living in the Leda refugee camp, was furious.

“My husband is a bad man,” she announced, after she finally admitted the girls’ true provenance. “I am tired of all his lies.”

Later, when I reached Mr. Hossain by phone, he was seething.

“I beat her when you left,” he said. “I will beat her again tomorrow.”

Mr. Hossain’s sister-in-law had also explained part of the family’s complicated truth. A neighbor later relayed that her candor had earned her a beating from her husband.



Rather than highlight the plight of unaccompanied minors, my reporting had catalyzed domestic violence in two households. I regretted the days of questioning Ms. Sajida, who goes by one name.

I had found her unsympathetic when she said she wished those girls would disappear back to Myanmar. But that night her husband would beat her. As I stood and judged her for not embracing these four girls from her husband’s youngest wife, a cockroach skittered across the floor. A rat followed.

Ms. Sajida began crying.

All around, through the bamboo slats that make up the walls of a Rohingya shelter, children’s eyes followed my movements, wondering what I was doing there and why I had made a grown woman weep.

=====================================================================
It is well known that many asylum seekers fabricate and embellish their claims in the hope of having their claims accepted.

So we are starting an international committee which includes many foreign experts and officials from middle like Japan to handle such a claim whether they are true or not. In this regards , China is understanding this and support our move. So BD also should cooperate with us if u guys genuinely want to solve this. it will also help to accelerate the repatriation of these people. if not , all u can do is just opening multiple threads to curse Myanmar and China here.


We allowed many media many times to go that area if u dont blind , we will see it. UN is under controlled by western powers. why we should allow them to prove their claim. ? They accused , then the organizations controlled by them will prove their claims as they want. many cases happened..

Like this one which was spotted by BBC journalist when he visited Myanmar in a controlled stage drama by Myanmar janta?

I was referring to letting media in to do their investigation properly along with UN, not just selective site visit only under watch of Janta for their propaganda PR purpose!!!

https://observers.france24.com/en/2...s-create-posed-photos-frame-rohingya-violence

The photos that the government distributed, showing actors pretending to be Rohingya and burning a house.
ROHINGYA / ISLAM - 09/11/2017
Burmese govt fake images to frame Rohingya for violence

Contribute




Photos showing a group of men and women setting light to a house in Burma have been circulating online since September 6. According to the authorities, they show how the Rohingya, a persecuted Muslim minority in the country, are deliberately setting fire to their own houses to receive international sympathy. However, the Burmese government posed the photos itself as part of an anti-Muslim propaganda campaign.

Activists for the Rohingya and Jonathan Head, a correspondent for the BBC, revealed that the photos are not quite what they seem. Head was part of a group of local and foreign journalists that were invited on a government-organised trip to Maungdaw, a town in Buddhist-majority Rakhine state in the west of the country. Government officials distributed these photos to the journalists, saying that they showed the Rohingya burning their own homes in order to frame the Burmese government. But the photos were posed, as was soon discovered by Head and other journalists.

One of the photos showing the actors pretending to be Rohingya torching a house.
These photos were also posted on the Facebook group Rohingya Community, which posts news about the situation for Rohingya in the country. They wrote a post explaining why the photos were fake [we have edited it for clarity].

Note the white caps the men actors are wearing. Those caps are totally new. Rohingya people aren’t wearing caps in these moments of life or death. And even if they wore Islamic caps, they wouldn’t be as clean and shiny as in those photos.

The women in the photos tried to resemble real Rohingya women by wearing hijab. But Rohingya women never wear hijab that way at all. It is very clear that they do not even know how to wear a piece of cloth on their heads.

The men in the photos are hiding their faces under masks [bandanas].

None of them are facing the camera to hide their real faces.

Most of all: why on earth would someone be so foolish as to document his crime by letting a cameraman take shots from all angles?

The truth: This was the house of a real Rohingya family. Most probably some of the family members were killed and others managed to flee. Later these actors (Buddhists) came to change the scenario of the reality.

Photo showing a woman posing as a Rohingya and torching a house.

“The women are wearing tablecloths on their heads”
In a Facebook post and an article, Head confirms this analysis, and picks up on other details that serve to further indict the Burmese government.

One of the women who appears in the photos torching a home is wearing a distinctive bright orange top, a grey and purple longyi, and a white lacy headscarf. Photos show that this same woman, minus the headscarf, spoke to the journalists at a school in Maungdaw that was serving as a shelter for displaced Hindu families. She told the journalists about Muslim abuse against Hindus.

This photo collage shows that one of the women posing as Rohingya to burn down the house was the same Hindu woman who later on spoke vehemently against Muslims in a tirade to journalists.
Amongst other actors, she was used by the government to pose as a Muslim militant torching houses, and also to speak persuasively to a troupe of journalists about Muslim-perpetrated violence.

Two of the photos sent to us by an Observer.
In a Facebook post that has been shared 2,400 times, Head wrote: “I realise now that among Hindus arranged by the government to be filmed and interviewed on Sept 6 in Maungdaw were two people who dressed up as Muslims for the fake photos given to us there." He said that the “acting” in the photos was “unconvincing”, and “the women are wearing tablecloths on their heads”.

The Rohingya have been accused of attacking the Buddhist and Hindu populations in the country, as well as security forces. While these photos were clearly posed and prove that it was not in fact Rohingya who were burning down their own houses on this occasion, this does not mean that it is always the case.

Another photo showing the women "with tablecloths on their heads", setting light to the house.
According to the Burmese government, the violent crackdown in the country is in response to attacks by militants from the rebel group Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA). Authorities also deny that the military has targeted Rohingya civilians. More than 300,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled across the border to Bangladesh since August 25.

In an address to the UN Human Rights Council on September 11, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein called the military operation by the Burmese government a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing”.

 

[Sine Nomine]

There are difference between courtesy donation and taking aid actively like Pakistan.

Donation and Aid are same kiddo,we are taking loans.

 

[Black_cats]

Myanmar is not even good at cover up. BBC journalist caught red handed the rakhine budhists who were burning muslim villages with the help of local police,

 

[Aung Zaya]

Every country has their pride, which country bent to eocomic sanctions in recent history? China was under sanction after 1989, did China buckle? Sanctions bringing countries to their knees is just a wishful thinking.

China will do her part to try to get things done smoothly through peaceful and coperative means.

Chinese govt to play mediator in sending back Rohingyas refugees from Bangladesh to Myanmar
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...angladesh-to-myanmar/articleshow/68788655.cms

They dont really care about these refugee. all they want to see is Myanmar is ruined due to economic sanction.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Says the bottle feeding two cent CCP hack, Taiwan has never issued any official statement regarding Arunachal Pradesh, themselves being the victims of PRC hegemony they will never endorse oppression and Chinese imperialism.

Continue with your discussion by any means you deem fit, don't bring Arunachal to it. The people here respectfully ask you to eff off.

Baby. Give up lying. British colonial expansionism is over.

It’s looks like you are still sleeping. Open your eyes and come out of fantasy world projected to you by Communist Party.

LOL you seem to believe that the US will give you courage. but believe me, it's your illusion.

@Black_cats Baby, you're so cute.

 

[Black_cats]

On topic. More pictures of firefigher motorcycle handover ceremony.

A handover ceremony of 1,000 firefighting motorcycles donated by the Chinese government is held in Purbachal, Bangladesh, May 2, 2019. China on Thursday donated 1,000 firefighting motorcycles to Bangladesh in a bid to help strengthen the operational capability of Bangladesh's fire service and civil defense. Chen Wei, charge d'affaires of the Chinese Embassy in Bangladesh, handed over the motorcycles to the Bangladesh authorities at a ceremony at Purbachal, a new township on the eastern side of capital Dhaka. (Xinhua/Stringer)

http://en.people.cn/n3/2019/0505/c90000-9574964-5.html

Baby. Give up lying. British colonial expansionism is over.

LOL you seem to believe that the US will give you courage. but believe me, it's your illusion.

@Black_cats Baby, you're so cute.
View attachment 558642

The map shows that you are having issues with all of your neighbor. It just demonstrates what kind of country you are.

 

[namefield_empty]

Baby. Give up lying. British colonial expansionism is over.

LOL you seem to believe that the US will give you courage. but believe me, it's your illusion.

@Black_cats Baby, you're so cute.
View attachment 558642

Stop parroting CCP propaganda about our NE India.

Does history support China’s claim over Arunachal Pradesh?

The areas under present Arunachal Pradesh except the tiny Tawang tract never formed part of Tibet and, therefore, cannot be termed as South Tibet which the Chinese often used to say. As regards China’s claim over Arunachal Pradesh, no historical evidences, whatsoever are available in their support. The Chinese did not have any military control or military post in Arunachal Pradesh at any point of time. The French born historian and Tibetologist Claude Arpi has written in his book ‘1962 and the McMahon Line Saga’ that “…during the last two millennia , the Chinese have never set a foot in what is today Arunachal Pradesh & former NEFA, except for one short visit in one particular location.”

The referred to ‘short visit’ was that of a Chinese Army contingent while in an expedition to Tibet in 1911 to suppress the Tibetan revolt against all foreigners including the Chinese. It came down to Wallong and planted some token boundary marks. The same were subsequently uprooted and confiscated by the British India forces and kept the areas free from further incursion of both the Chinese and the Tibetans. In any case, a casual incursion of this type does not mean that the entire Arunachal Pradesh was under the Chinese control.

The history of Arunachal Pradesh being so, it was never ever a part of Tibet or China (except the small Tawang tract), the claim over entire Arunachal Pradesh by China is nothing but an absurd proposition under some hidden agenda or motive.

On the other hand, there is abundant evidence of India’s political, religious and cultural presence in Arunachal. The ruins and relics of Bhishmak Nagar, Parasuram Kunda, Malini Than, Bhalukpung, the Brick Fort or Itanagar are some pieces of historical evidences of Indian cultural and political presence in Arunachal Pradesh in the period of early history. In the medieval period also, the tribes of Arunachal Pradesh remained independent who, however, expressed their loyalty to the rulers of Assam and in return, the Assam kings accorded the tribesmen free and safe passage to the plains of Assam and treated with lavish gifts. Evidences are there that the Ahom kings had recruits in its army from the Arunachali tribes too.

Above all, that the lofty mountain range of the Himalayas, the natural boundary of India and Tibet is known to the world since the time immemorial by the nomenclature ‘Himalayas”, which is a Sanskrit word meaning ‘abode of the snow’, no doubt, suggest of Indian influence and control over the areas up to and including the Himalayan ranges.
Excerpts from: https://www.sentinelassam.com/news/does-history-support-chinas-claim-over-arunachal-pradesh/

Let Taiwan first take over what's rightfully her's, the Chinese mainland, we shall then discuss Arunachal with her. And for the last time, present RoC government has never ever laid any claim to Arunachal.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

On topic. More pictures of firefigher motorcycle handover ceremony.

A handover ceremony of 1,000 firefighting motorcycles donated by the Chinese government is held in Purbachal, Bangladesh, May 2, 2019. China on Thursday donated 1,000 firefighting motorcycles to Bangladesh in a bid to help strengthen the operational capability of Bangladesh's fire service and civil defense. Chen Wei, charge d'affaires of the Chinese Embassy in Bangladesh, handed over the motorcycles to the Bangladesh authorities at a ceremony at Purbachal, a new township on the eastern side of capital Dhaka. (Xinhua/Stringer)

http://en.people.cn/n3/2019/0505/c90000-9574964-5.html



The map shows that you are having issues with all of your neighbor. It just demonstrates what kind of country you are.

Ah, but you were still a colony at that time.

Stop parroting CCP propaganda about our NE India.

Does history support China’s claim over Arunachal Pradesh?

The areas under present Arunachal Pradesh except the tiny Tawang tract never formed part of Tibet and, therefore, cannot be termed as South Tibet which the Chinese often used to say. As regards China’s claim over Arunachal Pradesh, no historical evidences, whatsoever are available in their support. The Chinese did not have any military control or military post in Arunachal Pradesh at any point of time. The French born historian and Tibetologist Claude Arpi has written in his book ‘1962 and the McMahon Line Saga’ that “…during the last two millennia , the Chinese have never set a foot in what is today Arunachal Pradesh & former NEFA, except for one short visit in one particular location.”

The referred to ‘short visit’ was that of a Chinese Army contingent while in an expedition to Tibet in 1911 to suppress the Tibetan revolt against all foreigners including the Chinese. It came down to Wallong and planted some token boundary marks. The same were subsequently uprooted and confiscated by the British India forces and kept the areas free from further incursion of both the Chinese and the Tibetans. In any case, a casual incursion of this type does not mean that the entire Arunachal Pradesh was under the Chinese control.

The history of Arunachal Pradesh being so, it was never ever a part of Tibet or China (except the small Tawang tract), the claim over entire Arunachal Pradesh by China is nothing but an absurd proposition under some hidden agenda or motive.

On the other hand, there is abundant evidence of India’s political, religious and cultural presence in Arunachal. The ruins and relics of Bhishmak Nagar, Parasuram Kunda, Malini Than, Bhalukpung, the Brick Fort or Itanagar are some pieces of historical evidences of Indian cultural and political presence in Arunachal Pradesh in the period of early history. In the medieval period also, the tribes of Arunachal Pradesh remained independent who, however, expressed their loyalty to the rulers of Assam and in return, the Assam kings accorded the tribesmen free and safe passage to the plains of Assam and treated with lavish gifts. Evidences are there that the Ahom kings had recruits in its army from the Arunachali tribes too.

Above all, that the lofty mountain range of the Himalayas, the natural boundary of India and Tibet is known to the world since the time immemorial by the nomenclature ‘Himalayas”, which is a Sanskrit word meaning ‘abode of the snow’, no doubt, suggest of Indian influence and control over the areas up to and including the Himalayan ranges.
Excerpts from: https://www.sentinelassam.com/news/does-history-support-chinas-claim-over-arunachal-pradesh/

Let Taiwan first take over what's rightfully her's, the Chinese mainland, we shall then discuss Arunachal with her. And for the last time, present RoC government has never ever laid any claim to Arunachal.

Let Britain take over India. Then talk to me about “Arunachal”!

British expedition to Tibet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_expedition_to_Tibet

The British expedition to Tibet, also known as the British invasion of Tibet or the Younghusband expedition to Tibet began in December 1903 and lasted until September 1904. The expedition was effectively a temporary invasion by British Indian forces under the auspices of the Tibet Frontier Commission, whose purported mission was to establish diplomatic relations and resolve the dispute over the border between Tibet and Sikkim.[2] In the nineteenth century, the British conquered Burma and Sikkim, occupying the whole southern flank of Tibet. The Tibetan Ganden Phodrang regime, which was then under administrative rule of the Qing dynasty, remained the only Himalayan state free of British influence.

The expedition was intended to counter Russia's perceived ambitions in the East and was initiated largely by Lord Curzon, the head of the British India government. Curzon had long obsessed over Russia's advance into Central Asia and now feared a Russian invasion of British India.[3] In April 1903, the British received clear assurances from the Russian government that it had no interest in Tibet. "In spite, however, of the Russian assurances, Lord Curzon continued to press for the dispatch of a mission to Tibet", a high level British political officer noted.[4]

The expedition fought its way to Gyantse and eventually reached Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, in August 1904. The Dalai Lama had fled to safety, first in Mongolia and later in China, but thousands of Tibetans armed with antiquated muzzle-loaders and swords had been mown down by modern rifles and Maxim machine guns while attempting to block the British advance. At Lhasa, the Commission forced remaining Tibetan officials to sign the Treaty of Lhasa (1904), before withdrawing to Sikkim in September, with the understanding the Chinese government would not permit any other country to interfere with the administration of Tibet.[5]

The mission was recognized as a military expedition by the British Indian government, which issued a campaign medal, the Tibet Medal, to all those who took part.[6][7]

 

[UKBengali]

Many countries are waking up to the harsh realities. There were public protests in some African countries against China. I have read that, in some places in Africa, Chinese now move with armed protection for the fear of reprisal from common people. China is rapidly earning a bad reputation in many countries which was unthinkable even 10 years ago.

Now we know the real reason why BD refused to grant Sonadia to China. Well done to Hasina for rejecting China.

 

[namefield_empty]

British expedition to Tibet

Hare brained individuals on CCP payroll find it hard to comprehend that Arunachal Pradesh wasn't ever a part of Tibet just like much of your western provinces were never culturally related to mainland China. If there is one positive aspect of the atrocities committed by China on Tibet and Xinjiang, it is the realisation by the people living in Arunachal and Sikkim that similar fate awaits them if their lands were to be under Chinese dominion. Try meeting an Arunachali in real life, they won't have anything good to say about you evil despots.

 

[UKBengali]

Hare brained individuals on CCP payroll find it hard to comprehend that Arunachal Pradesh wasn't ever a part of Tibet just like much of your western provinces were never culturally related to mainland China. If there is one positive aspect of the atrocities committed by China on Tibet and Xinjiang, it is the realisation by the people living in Arunachal and Sikkim that similar fate awaits them if their lands were to be under Chinese dominion. Try meeting an Arunachali in real life, they won't have anything good to say about you evil despots.

The Communists have imprisoned 1 million Uyghurs to erase their culture - ruthless dictatorship they are.

 

[Black_cats]

The Communists have imprisoned 1 million Uyghurs to erase their culture - ruthless dictatorship they are.

Not only that this one as well!!

Ramzan: China bans Muslims from fasting in Xinjiang

https://www.newsnation.in/world-new...ty-muslim-uighur-minority-article-223052.html

 

[namefield_empty]

The Communists have imprisoned 1 million Uyghurs to erase their culture - ruthless dictatorship they are.

Such internment camps are reminiscent of Soviet era gulags, no surprise as Mao himself said that power flows from the barrel of a gun.

 

[UKBengali]

Such internment camps are reminiscent of Soviet era gulags, no surprise as Mao himself said that power flows from the barrel of a gun.

Now I know why Hasina has kept her distance from China.
It simply does not have civilised values.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Hare brained individuals on CCP payroll find it hard to comprehend that Arunachal Pradesh wasn't ever a part of Tibet just like much of your western provinces were never culturally related to mainland China. If there is one positive aspect of the atrocities committed by China on Tibet and Xinjiang, it is the realisation by the people living in Arunachal and Sikkim that similar fate awaits them if their lands were to be under Chinese dominion. Try meeting an Arunachali in real life, they won't have anything good to say about you evil despots.

wow. indian jokes. Like "Superpower 2012". Nehru gave the UNSC position to China. In 1962, China sneaked into India. . . It is now that southern Tibet does not belong to Tibet...the western provinces of China have belonged to China since 100 BC. Cultural ties have never been interrupted. Of course, I don't expect India's 400 million illiterates to know that. but, whether in Xinjiang or Tibet. They are all richer than India.

Oh, thank you for reminding me. India annexed Sikkim (a sovereign state).