What's new

China declares intention to push India back to 1959 LAC

In case you haven't noticed, the stance of Indian government has been simple. Very diplomatic and very firm -- at times punctuated by re-enforcing actions on the border and by imposing incremental restriction on Chinese trade with India.

Tough talk however, India economy will suffer.

Look at all your gov/private sector projects. All fueled by chinese imports.

Your media is hyping up for you naive indians. Man of substance would know its a bluff :D

China? Well their entire agenda is all over the place. They have tried unsuccessfully to verbally intimidate India. They have tried unsuccessfully to bring Kashmir into the debate, nothing happened. They refused sharing agreed water flow data causing misery to Indian common people -- will like to see how it will go with their image.

aww cry baby is here.

Besides you indians bath, sh1t,piss, cremate(WTF?) in your river. Nobody drinks it anyway

In the end, what has happened till now is what exactly being discussed in Chinese government: The conflict with India will cause damage to both the nations but will not bring any strategic target to fruition.

Caught you, India is scare of a conflict with China. You said it.

India has garnered supported from Japan and Vietnam. India has also stood on her commitment to Bhutan in face of a power five times bigger. Modi personally got to prove his 56 inch credentials. While Khangress bowed to China in Dault Bag incidence, Modi administration took China by the snout.

All in all good for India and Modi/BJP.

Funny how India needs support from smaller and weaker countries than itself.

India must be real afraid of China. Modi is such a pu$$y.

Only issue was, US was way away from Iraq and Iraq didn't have long range bombers or missiles or any border with US. Ever wonder why US does not like any war on her own soil? Even in WW2, was there any major action on US soil?


You have just described Dokhlam and India China border dispute perfectly. 'Just stuck here'.

Dont be an idiot

US army is world centric

You cry babies are hilarious
 
.
Only issue was, US was way away from Iraq and Iraq didn't have long range bombers or missiles or any border with US. Ever wonder why US does not like any war on her own soil? Even in WW2, was there any major action on US soil?


You have just described Dokhlam and India China border dispute perfectly. 'Just stuck here'.
I almost know nothing about India.dont understands many india behaviors.current dispute is only diplomatic issue,but India gov raised trade barriers to China,why?it make the whole thing more difficult to handle.
 
.
I almost know nothing about India.dont understands many india behaviors.current dispute is only diplomatic issue,but India gov raised trade barriers to China,why?it make the whole thing more difficult to handle.
Do not try to regard Indians as human beings. To understand their ultra-aggressive behavior, regard Indians as monkeys throwing their feces everywhere in an aggressive manner. It all becomes clear now!
 
Last edited:
.
I almost know nothing about India.dont understands many india behaviors.current dispute is only diplomatic issue,but India gov raised trade barriers to China,why?it make the whole thing more difficult to handle.
The anti dumping duties are put on Chinese import by many countries. Not just India.

The avoidance of Chinese company in power sector is because it is a strategic part. Also, we see China as a threat.

We don't need to hand the key to a thief. (proverb)
 
.
Do not try to regard Indians as human beings. To understand their ultra-aggressive behavior, regard Indians as monkeys throwing their feces everywhere in an aggressive manner. It all becomes clear now!
Why are you so distressed?

Relax.
 
.
I almost know nothing about India.dont understands many india behaviors.current dispute is only diplomatic issue,but India gov raised trade barriers to China,why?it make the whole thing more difficult to handle.
There are quite a few dimensions to this standoff. Chinese raised the possibility of getting involving in Kashmir conflict and turned up the heat on India. India turned up the heat by rejecting a possible sale of an Indian company to a Chinese holding company. If India had outright put sanctions on Chinese imports, it would have been too fast of a escalation. So India raised concerns over possible security risk of Chinese telecom products. Chinese company Huwei then fired their Indian staff in Iran. Its a back and forth dance of trade aspect.

Do not try to regard Indians as human beings. To understand their ultra-aggressive behavior, regard Indians as monkeys throwing their feces everywhere in an aggressive manner. It all becomes clear now!
Relax, take a Diazepam. You past does not define you future. Okay? No Pakistani is coming to get you :lol:. You are safe in Dhaka... For now at least.

Why are you so distressed?

Relax.
He is worried that Pakistani army is coming to get him in his home in Dhaka. You know memories from 70s? Typical signs of PTSD.
 
. .
What made you think I am distressed? Am I an Indian posting on a Pakistani forum?
First, you are not a Chinese. For sure!

Now who the hell, hides behind a false flag? someone who is afraid!

You are time and again yapping 'nuke nuke nuke'. No one from China does it! Chinese believe that nukes are wasted on India and China is powerful enough to put India in its place using conventional weapons in a very short time. So Who does yapping like you? A distressed soul!

You have time and again described all your violent fantasies. Who the hell does that? Someone who is powerless! Powerful folks are agressive in their actions not words. Unless there is a strategy behind it, which you dont have.

So it brings the question! Who are you? You cann't be Chinese surely. Even Pakistani are too sure of themselves. So that leaves only one nationality with this kind of mindset in this region. Bangladeshi! A Jamaati Bangladeshi :rofl: :lol:

No wonder people think you are distressed. Bad memories from past are hard to get rid of, eh?
 
Last edited:
.
There are quite a few dimensions to this standoff. Chinese raised the possibility of getting involving in Kashmir conflict and turned up the heat on India. India turned up the heat by rejecting a possible sale of an Indian company to a Chinese holding company. If India had outright put sanctions on Chinese imports, it would have been too fast of a escalation. So India raised concerns over possible security risk of Chinese telecom products. Chinese company Huwei then fired their Indian staff in Iran. Its a back and forth dance of trade aspect.
Ok,I found China also raised a similar concerns over possible security risk,didnt pointed to India directly.perfect symmetry in diplomacy.boring.what's India's next step ?it looks like India is very busy these days,diplomatic channels,buying weapons,trade sanctions. Most countries only want to sell more weapons to India,but those weapons will not deliver at once,what's next?
 
.
Ok,I found China also raised a similar concerns over possible security risk,didnt pointed to India directly.perfect symmetry in diplomacy.boring.what's India's next step ?it looks like India is very busy these days,diplomatic channels,buying weapons,trade sanctions. Most countries only want to sell more weapons to India,but those weapons will not deliver at once,what's next?

Next is nothing actually. You have to look this stand-off in a broader scale of events.

Xi has an important event lined up in October, related to internal politics of Party. He has his own faction and opponents in that. I may hazard a guess that it will be his priority now.

Similarly Modi is busy in capturing a majority in upper house of Indian parliament via state elections. And his next election is only about one and a half years away.

Both leaders have their priorities set in front of them. Both will not do anything major till Oct-Nov besides rhetorics. Beyond that, even rhetorics will die down and stand off will continue. At some opportune time, it will be resolved by withdrawal of respective armies. The order of withdrawal won't matter at that point of time. It could be India first or China first. Once it is out of eyesight, it is out of mind. Unlike 62, China is not worried about her position in Tibet. Nor India playing the cards of forward policy. It is a stand off with rhetorics punctuated by diplomatic statements and trade elbowing here and there. Thats all.
 
.
do the chinese have enough stones 2 invade a country with 1,5 billion population ? :rofl::rofl:
 
.
Next is nothing actually. You have to look this stand-off in a broader scale of events.

Xi has an important event lined up in October, related to internal politics of Party. He has his own faction and opponents in that. I may hazard a guess that it will be his priority now.

Similarly Modi is busy in capturing a majority in upper house of Indian parliament via state elections. And his next election is only about one and a half years away.

Both leaders have their priorities set in front of them. Both will not do anything major till Oct-Nov besides rhetorics. Beyond that, even rhetorics will die down and stand off will continue. At some opportune time, it will be resolved by withdrawal of respective armies. The order of withdrawal won't matter at that point of time. It could be India first or China first. Once it is out of eyesight, it is out of mind. Unlike 62, China is not worried about her position in Tibet. Nor India playing the cards of forward policy. It is a stand off with rhetorics punctuated by diplomatic statements and trade elbowing here and there. Thats all.
Agree with your conclusion.
Xi is a tough man,all military regions are reorganized now.beidaihe meeting is finished,no more important issues to be discussed in npc.
Modi is also an ambitious man,he wants a new India, needs some kinds of revolution to make India more rich.normally this kind of revolution will make the whole country unstable for several years,it need no external security threatening. Deng decided open policy in China based on a conclusion,30years no big war .why modi will take this risk?or my understanding is totally wrong,politicos target is only election and another election.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom