What's new

China applauds Russian FM remarks on South China Sea

Then keep this issue unsolved :D, China can drag this issue for ever as we did with India...time is on China's side.

we should do same tactic to counter China, there is good reason for USA presence in Asia for ever and Russia could get benefits from weapons selling for both Vietnam, China and Indonesia..:enjoy:
 
. .
As long as USA stay on your soil or in PH soil, we don't have any problem :D

5 USA bases existed in Pynoy is enough.:enjoy:

Edca_Bases_Philippines_CNNPH.png
 
. .
You say it is encough, so it is, hehe.

In fact, I prefer seeing USA stay on Vietnam, that's will very interesting, they miss you so much, hehe.

No needed my friend, lifting on lethal weapons embargo is OK.
 
. . . .
I predict by 2020s, the US will force Vietnam to give up a base for the GI. It is so predicable with the US game plan.

As how they did with PH by selling China's threat to the region:agree:. Donald Trump once said Korea and Japan will have to pay for protection fee, I guess VN and PH will have to do the same in the future since US don't have money as it used to have.
 
. .
we should do same tactic to counter China, there is good reason for USA presence in Asia for ever and Russia could get benefits from weapons selling for both Vietnam, China and Indonesia..:enjoy:

One must be crazy to wish for US military presence in their homeland. Lots of socioeconomic ills ensue once you allow foreign military contingency on your soils.

Besides, they are entirely foreign to you culturally, will hold superiority complex against your civilian populations (especially women) and will leave you in the open at the first instance once they feel their own safety is in danger.

In the end, they will give you psychological assurance and ease of mind, perhaps, but take real tangibles away from you in addition to corrupting your culture and morals.

The only way is to sit down and talk to China one on one; otherwise, you will lose long term because China can hold its breath much longer than your weak economic, industrial, military and technological capabilities could.
 
Last edited:
.
One must be crazy to wish for US military presence in their homeland. Lots of socioeconomic ills ensue once you allow foreign military contingency on your soils.

Besides, they are entirely foreign to you culturally, will hold superiority complex against your civilian populations (especially women) and will leave you in the open at the first instance once they feel their own safety is in danger.

In the end, they will give you psychological assurance and ease of mind, perhaps, but take real tangibles away from you in addition to corrupting your culture and morals.

The only way is to sit down and talk to China one on one; otherwise, you will lose long term because China can hold its breath much longer than your weak economic, industrial, military and technological capabilities could.

we are no kids, my friend, pls don't teach ús like that.

We do know well about mentality of Chinese, you would like to be master here and dominate Asia. It is true ambition of Chinese. Expansion policy doesn't help you. In fact China has denied follow negotiation with Vietnam over Paracel and with other partner who is related to spratly.

Occupation illegally on such man made islands is meaningless for China security, when American has right to take care for free navigation and Aviation on East and South East Asia.

What China has softly handling with VCP recently is tactic of China in this moment only. True intention of China, to swallow Islands of Vietnam in East Sea of Vietnam, is unchanged.

USA and Japan will be present on East Sea of Vietnam to keep China under controls. It is no bad for Vietnam.
 
Last edited:
.
We do know well about mentality of Chinese, you would like to be master here and dominate Asia. It is true ambition of Chinese. Expansion policy doesn't help you. In fact China has denied follow negotiation with Vietnam over Paracel and with other partner who is related to spratly.

Xisha is an inherent territory of China with islands are in full development that has cost billions of dollars. They are beyond to be negotiated, I am afraid. Do not be over optimistic; even one on one talks on Nansha would not involve giving up on historic rights and entitlements of China.

Bilateral talks mean upgrading the status quo and managing the disputes with no major incidents among the related parties.

Occupation illegally on such man made islands is meaningless for China security, when American has right to take care for free navigation and Aviation on East and South East Asia.

If those full-fledged islands can be developed as defensive structures, they do provide some deterrence to the US military adventures. As China is more involved in ensuring freedom of navigation in SCS, the US will be squeezed out. But, obviously, for some time to come, China and the US will share high waters as China goes further blue navy. Nonetheless, freedom of navigation and China's ownership of islands in SCS are two different things. China will slowly absorb the islands, while at the same time, reinforcing freedom of navigation, which will keep the US with no real excuse to intervene.

In the final analysis, if it intervenes militarily, damaging China's interests in any way, it will be responded equally. If they are ready to die for you and the Philippines, we will help them achieve the objective.

What China has softly handling with VCP recently is tactic of China in this moment only. True intention of China to swallow Islands of Vietnam in East Sea of Vietnam, is unchanged.

Definitely, those islands will eventually be taken back. But we will recognize your rights for freedom of navigation and ocean exploitation.

USA and Japan will be present on East Sea of Vietnam to keep China under controls. It is no bad for Vietnam.

Japan is fine as we are readying to sign world's third largest free trade regime.

You can invite the US to stay nearby, but do not give them any base rights that would allows soldiers to be stationed. That's not healthy for your nation's moral and cultural viability.

As I see you are smart as it is now the Philippines that takes all the brunt while Vietnam enjoys positive externalities only.
 
.
One must be crazy to wish for US military presence in their homeland. Lots of socioeconomic ills ensue once you allow foreign military contingency on your soils.

Besides, they are entirely foreign to you culturally, will hold superiority complex against your civilian populations (especially women) and will leave you in the open at the first instance once they feel their own safety is in danger.
One must be crazy to wish for US military presence in their homeland. Lots of socioeconomic ills ensue once you allow foreign military contingency on your soils.

Besides, they are entirely foreign to you culturally, will hold superiority complex against your civilian populations (especially women) and will leave you in the open at the first instance once they feel their own safety is in danger.
Exactly buddy. I would rather die than be shamed to let a foreigner control our country.
But then again, we are talking to shameless folks.
 
.
we should do same tactic to counter China, there is good reason for USA presence in Asia for ever and Russia could get benefits from weapons selling for both Vietnam, China and Indonesia..:enjoy:
That is provided America can continue stay this way. Time is on Chinese side becos USA is a declining nation. :D

US will soon bankrupt or scale down military activities as their economy is shrinking. Once USA is goner. China will wallop and teach those countries who is the real boss. :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom