What's new

China and India’s 2,000-year manufacturing reign

.
The Indus River was "Indian" for a long time?? :lol:

No, it is a river in Pakistan. It was also the crade of all South Asian Civilization, and the heir of all the assorted religions that emerged from it.
"Pakistan" is not even a 100 year old idea bro....... :D
Whereas "Hindustan" has existed for thousands of years side by side river indus without any foreign enroachment till 1947 as is evident from thr rig vedic verse i earlier posted........
 
. .
IVC is fully yours (except IVC sites like Lothal, Rupar, Kalibangan etc. in India) and please declare Punjabi as your official languages as Urdu was entirely developed in India and Pakistan has no right to make Urdu as official language of Pakistan

Urdu is a Lashkari language meaning it has arabic,persian,turkic origins and not taught in india.. indian muslims cant even read the script ... and hindus etc consider it as the language of muslims as it was the lingua franca of Northern muslims...

Also the janani janmabhumi is a symbol of nepal...lol

As Hindus, South Indian Hindus has as much a claim on Hindu history as North Indian Hindus and vice versa.. We share the same blood and share the same history..

No wonder the northern indians are racists towards the southies and also the southies have different genetic make up...
 
.
chinese dragon has successfully hijacked this thread. And Indians fell for his tactics
 
.
Urdu is a Lashkari language meaning it has arabic,persian,turkic origins

You missed Hindi origin of Urdu.. Another thing Urdu was born in Lucknow and developed in Delhi and is one of the national language of India.. God knows why Punjabi was not made national language of Pakistan..

Also the janani janmabhumi is a symbol of nepal...lol

What is that suppose to mean? "janani janmabhumi" is a Sanskrit phrase..
 
.
The fact remains that India was never ever an united country before the british gave left in 1947. Even muslim rule was
scattered and many muslim nawabs were autonomous.after brithish rule Muslims of the subcontinent were under Hindu hegemony threat and our
forefathers feared that their children will be influenced by pagan culture, a fear that came true if you look at current indian
pseudo muslims like bollywood khans. Muslims as feared by our forefathers have been turned into second class citizens in india.
So PAK formation was very important to protect the interest of muslim of S.asia and hence whether or not the name PAK existed 1000s of years ago doesn't matter. For muslims , religion comes first than historical and cultural identity.

As for china, its a known fact that it existed for 1000s of years, may be not in her present form but definitely existed under an
united central gov/kingdom. Denying that would be hight of ignorance but Indians here are know for their inflated ego and
intentional ignorance.:)
 
.
No wonder the northern indians are racists towards the southies and also the southies have different genetic make up...

There may be some racists but point is there is no difference in genetic make up between North and South Indians.. They are more or less same..
 
.
You're claiming the legacy of the IVC even though it existed almost entirely within what is now modern-day Pakistan? :lol:

Ask the Pakistanis first, it's their territory, therefore their history.

Thank you CD and I will come on here on behalf of all Pakistanis and accept your acknowledgement of Pakistani legasy
 
.
You're claiming the legacy of the IVC even though it existed almost entirely within what is now modern-day Pakistan? :lol:

Ask the Pakistanis first, it's their territory, therefore their history.
obviously you have no idea what legacy means........
let me explain it in simpler terms-
would the legacy of the turkish ottoman empire be of Yemen?
or will the legacy of soviet union be that of georgia??
ofcourse not!!!no matter the current geographical position the legacy is for the idealogical,cultural succesor
 
.
The mighty Indus Valley Civilization existed in what is now modern-day Pakistan.

India keeps trying to claim these things from her neighbours, such as Buddhism (when in fact Buddha was born in what is now modern-day Nepal).... and the Indus Valley Civilization, which was situated in what is now modern-day Pakistan.

What gives India the right to claim the history of a great civilization that existed almost entirely within modern Pakistan's borders? Just because your culture was born from there?
Is it you who decides India's rights?..Pakistan only came to existence after 1947...Word Pakistan had no meaning before 1947..India..on the other hand,has history,you can't trace.
 
.
You missed Hindi origin of Urdu.. Another thing Urdu was born in Lucknow and developed in Delhi and is one of the national language of India.. God knows why Punjabi was not made national language of Pakistan..

LOL national languages of india tht are not taught in schools nor can any indian read them... also the urdu spoken in delhi n lucknow are not even pure with dilluted and spoken with a pathetic accent... it was the lingua franca of mughal courts and the muslims.... as for Punjabi being a national language only if Pakistan was a homogeneous country like Japan.. and so logically speaking.... thts a really retarded question...


What is that suppose to mean? "janani janmabhumi" is a Sanskrit phrase..

Which is the motto of nepal and represent nepalese nationalism and associated with nepal... just some info.
 
. .
LOL... CD

China is As Mythical As a Dragon

India has a Ocean named after it, for China... ha ha ha even their neighbors want to the change the name of a sea.

CD.. to tell you the truth the concept of China is as shallow as the sea whereas the concept of India is as mighty as a ocean.

West Philippine or East Vietnam Sea or SCS will always be a subset of mighty Ocean, learn to live with it.
Chinese dragon,won't reply you...he has one fixed post that he keeps posting again and again..and when someone brings him down to earth..he vanishes..;)
 
.
Is it you who decides India's rights?..Pakistan only came to existence after 1947...Word Pakistan had no meaning before 1947..India..on the other hand,has history,you can't trace.

Lol.. india is younger than Pakistan... india was created on 15 august 1947... go read a book or something.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom