What's new

China: Abusing history?

That's right, we should reconvert them back into 京族, who are historically the true Viets, not those current French wannabes.

And the northern part of Vietnam will also return to its motherland in the future. :lol:

And the southern part of Vietnam should be given back to our Khmer brothers, since it was belonging to them historically. :cheers:

And then since it was belonging to whom historically: Tibet, Manchuria, Uijgur, inner Mongolia, Woyou, DongYoue, JiangYue ... become independent states.:rofl:
 
.
CHina marines skin look so white, maybe they don't have Hard training in Tropical zone , can not compete with our hard and well trained soldiers in Tropical zone like SCS(east sea):cool:
dieubinh.jpg

then Europeans must be the least trained because they are so white,right?haha.you can see in sports we can easily beat you even Chinese players are much fair skinned,it is not because of lack of training.It is just the difference in race.what a funny conclusion you got there.ha
 
.
i don't know if they do the same job in foreign countries, but I only know that Vietnamese girls are kept in dog cages.

When you like to say about dog, I remind you the slogan: No Chinese and dogs allow !
 
.
And then since it was belonging to whom historically: Tibet, Manchuria, Uijgur, inner Mongolia, Woyou, DongYoue, JiangYue ... become independent states.:rofl:

Racially, the Viets are close to Chinese, but have been brainwashed by white French and thus acquired traits such as drug dealing, mafia crime, lies and being thieves.
 
.
Racially, the Viets are close to Chinese, but have been brainwashed by white French and thus acquired traits such as drug dealing, mafia crime, lies and being thieves.

Before cursing and blame some one else, look at yourself first.
But I'm wander about your signature !
"We are a colonial slave nation. In 1949 the Chinese people stood up. In 1979, we began kneeling back down."
 
.
All of the ancient shipwrecks and artifacts, found on these islands belongs to China, so China certainly have history and hard historical evidence to back up their claims, while Vietnam and Philippines have none but only very recent claims. Also by UNCLOS ruling Vietnam have no claim whatsoever to any part of the Spratlies yet they claim it, why? history? Don't be hypocritical.
 
.
Before cursing and blame some one else, look at yourself first.
But I'm wander about your signature !
"We are a colonial slave nation. In 1949 the Chinese people stood up. In 1979, we began kneeling back down."

it makes it even worse that you keep being enslaved by a colonial nation.
 
.
All of the ancient shipwrecks and artifacts, found on these islands belongs to China, so China certainly have history and hard historical evidence to back up their claims, while Vietnam and Philippines have none but only very recent claims. Also by UNCLOS ruling Vietnam have no claim whatsoever to any part of the Spratlies yet they claim it, why? history? Don't be hypocritical.
All of the ancient shipwrecks and artifacts, found on these islands are in consequence of the storms. The business ships came from Middle East and bough wares from China.
In case shipwrecks is considered as evident, it mean Arab people could claim the island, dear Sir !
 
.
it makes it even worse that you keep being enslaved by a colonial nation.

It's importance that we pushed all invaders : China, France, US out from Vietnam. Why Chinese forget very quickly that Chinese are enslaving by Mongolia, Manchuria, ans Japan ?
 
.
It's importance that we pushed all invaders : China, France, US out from Vietnam. Why Chinese forget very quickly that Chinese are enslaving by Mongolia, Manchuria, ans Japan ?

When was China enslaved by Japan? I only remember Vietnam being enslaved by French for 100 years, then enslaved by Americans for 50 years. They enslaved you so hard, your language changed. If it was not for China's help you would still be enslaved by the whites and your girls would still be the play toys of black US Marines.
 
.
then Europeans must be the least trained because they are so white,right?haha.you can see in sports we can easily beat you even Chinese players are much fair skinned,it is not because of lack of training.It is just the difference in race.what a funny conclusion you got there.ha
But they have Military tech advantage when you don't . Pls look at Lybia war , Nato only could use Air force bcz they soldiers can not fight well in Hot weather :cool:
 
.
Ridiculous logic, any large country increaseterritory in different historical periods, you have five children, your youngest child born in the year, so if he is your child, all the other four children are no longer your children? very absurd logic of China's history in the Spratly Islands has continued to this day, without interruption, not just the HAN and Tang, extended to the MING and QING, continues today, you have a thing from ancient times to today, this is not enough to prove your ownership? it is Chinese territory, it is China's children and other children. Your logic is ridiculous. The Chinese statement of our own history, but to explain our own qualifications, do you think Chinese qualification is not enough, I would like to see the Vietnamese have any qualifications, your qualifications better than China? please show your proof.
 
.
Very funny, you get a new property, to give up you all the other property, just because it comes from different times? Property ownership is not the case.

Prove your ownership of property, if they can prove you have enough qualifications to get it, if it has a dispute, you need to prove you are more qualified than others, it is enough, so you say China's eligibility is not enough, so we look at Vietnam's eligibility, if Vietnam is more qualified than china? some other balderdash, forget it.
 
.
Ridiculous logic, any large country increaseterritory in different historical periods, you have five children, your youngest child born in the year, so if he is your child, all the other four children are no longer your children? very absurd logic of China's history in the Spratly Islands has continued to this day, without interruption, not just the HAN and Tang, extended to the MING and QING, continues today, you have a thing from ancient times to today, this is not enough to prove your ownership? it is Chinese territory, it is China's children and other children. Your logic is ridiculous. The Chinese statement of our own history, but to explain our own qualifications, do you think Chinese qualification is not enough, I would like to see the Vietnamese have any qualifications, your qualifications better than China? please show your proof.
You can not see any China troop in those islands before our troop , so, those islands belong to VietNam .We've defend them for long time already.

If you just passed by a land , and say :' it belong to you ', then maybe American belong to CHina too :lol:
 
.
But they have Military tech advantage when you don't . Pls look at Lybia war , Nato only could use Air force bcz they soldiers can not fight well in Hot weather :cool:

haha,why do we have to fight in hot weather?beside now the result of the war will be decided by technology and money(in case of war of attrition,money will decide how long you can be in the race),much less than by sheer number of your army.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom