oct605032048
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2009
- Messages
- 2,972
- Reaction score
- 0
Even the russian engines were as advances as alien's technology it is still a second choice compared to home made fighter hearts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's a joke, you still haven't answered....
You answered with info foundation -(pre university) students know, and tools found mostly in all university laboratories. Not to mention that ProE and Nastran are mostly Mech. Eng. tools. But anyway, lets see past that.
So what PM would a decent engineer such as you allow for a system in such a case.. ?? this is an answer most control engineers know, by experience ... so what is it ?
if you are such an advanced engineer (wow) that you simply don't remember, ask some of your raytheon buddies .. they will still remember .. even if you claim you don't ...
oh i forgot to say .. lol, because lol makes everything better ..right?
Pure denial, that is low of you, low but expected.
The truth is hard to swollow, but the claims are officially from Saturn and the engines have undergone and passed endurance tests long ago To be more specific 5 engines or batches have been tested including two that were sent for in flight tests onboard the SU-35 117S-04 and 117S-05, and recently the pre production SU-35S has been undergoing flight tests.
As for your imature and off topic aircraft carrier rant, the blue prints for the future carrier(s) will not be ready until 2012, so your rant just backfired.
Use English, the moderators have warned you before.
So than you want to post a link to show everyone?
Also be specific about the AL-31, the engine design is 30 years old and conveniently you and your compatriots keep comparing the WS-10 to the original AL-31F. Why don't you compare it to something more modern such as AL-31FN or AL-31FM1?
.
[B said:ptldM3;[/B]2136446]
[B said:Will surpass? The WS-10 has never surpass anything from Saturn or Salyut and the 117S as well as the more advanced 117 simply outclass the WS-10 in every category.[/QUOTE]
//////////////////////////////////////
BullSH!T !!!!
WS-10G is BETTER than your S-117. WS-10G is on J-20, and it has 155KN of thrust while your so called "advanced" S-117 has just 147KN. Also, WS-10G is VERY VERY realiable. That is why the Chinese put it on J-20. Even thogh J-20 is still at its prototype stage!!
Your Pka-af after 2 years of testing still uses S-117 with no TVC!!! [B]WHAT A SHAME!!!!!! WHAT A SHAME!!!!![/B]
You are talking bullshit!!!
J-20 uses WS-10G, and is clearly NOT your russian S-117 engine. So how do you explain that?
The Chinese are confident enough to use WS-10G on their most important Stealth fighter prototype!! How can you mere russian say that WS-10 still have quality issues??
The fact is that your crappy Pka-af, still does not have TVC engine and still use S-117, yet you mere russians keep brag about how advanced your TVC is and how good your so called AL-41 is going!!!
What they are saying is that AL-31 has very short engine life. WS-10A has entered mass production and now comparable with AL-31FN, but WS-10G is far superior than AL-31FN, WS-10G is even better than S-117.
Russia has no chance selling S-117 to China. The reason China recently bought 150 AL-31FN is because has very short life around700 hours. That is why they are being replaced so fast.
You are wrong. There are some thing compareable already. WS-10A is comparable with AL-31FN, but WS-10A has more thrust.
WS-10G is even better than S-117, it has 155KN while S-117 has just 147KN. WS-10G is on J-20 now!!
Out Classed
You are talking bullshit!!!
J-20 uses WS-10G, and is clearly NOT your russian S-117 engine. So how do you explain that?
The Chinese are confident enough to use WS-10G on their most important Stealth fighter prototype!! How can you mere russian say that WS-10 still have quality issues??
The fact is that your crappy Pka-af, still does not have TVC engine and still use S-117, yet you mere russians keep brag about how advanced your TVC is and how good your so called AL-41 is going!!!
I disagree with u in this case. But J20 will use ws15 very soon. I think that will happen in 1 or 2 years.The J-20 uses the prototype of WS-15, and i know it is hard to believe. However, we will figure out later.
You still acting like a child!!!!
In mordern control it is all state space, and none linear control. But again these are theory. We control engineers use mostly software to do it!!!
Lame crap like PM, are used only for classical control and only for single input single output systems only. Also, it is completely NOT useful for nonlinear control!!!
you need to STFU and learn some basics!!!
---------- Post added at 03:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:36 PM ----------
This is amazing, J-20 at its early stage can already perform such tight turns like this!!!
F-35 can NEVER do this!!
I disagree with u in this case. But J20 will use ws15 very soon. I think that will happen in 1 or 2 years.
sigh, Because that is USA, I think u dont often pay attention with CD Fy 航天航空港, do u?。。。。What's the point to fly with an engine that will not be serve as the production aircraft?
Just check the history of F-22 4001, then you will get a clear picture how it works.
sigh, Because that is USA, I think u dont often pay attention with CD Fy 航天航空港, do u?。。。。
we can not compare with USA right now, especially engine tech. OK? we r far away behind USA。And J20 couldnt wait for WS15 to maiden flight, for political reasons, technical reasons and etc.
多去国内论坛里看看就明白了