Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are right man! The truth is F-35 is not the best in stealthy design, it accomadate too many using request of investment sides, this make it no special. I think SU-35 is even better, Indians should go for that.Thats because F-22 is not available for export, so Japan went for second best. Besides Japan can use F-35's on its helicopter carriers(with some modifications).
The Japanese did ask for the F-22. The Americans refused. The F-22 is strictly not for export after Congress voted for a ban on exports.
You are right man! The truth is F-35 is not the best in stealthy design, it accomadate too many using request of investment sides, this make it no special. I think SU-35 is even better, Indians should go for that.
S-35 is not that as advanced as F-35, but it's lot more radius, cheap and affordable.The F-35 is still a 5th generation plane, a generation ahead of the SU-35. It has the most advanced avionics, even more so than the current F-22s. But inferior in terms of stealth.
And challenged, if not outright debunked, here..."Lumps and bumps" seriously degrade F-35 stealthiness
The original X-35 was a stealthy design. The current F-35 SDD AA-1 is a "much inferior contoured design, clearly intended to accommodate the larger weapon bays."
The BOTH of you have a false understanding of the word 'conducting' in this context. As English is not my first language, am going to be kind to both of you for this.It's simple physics to understand the reason that a cylinder is not stealthy. An incoming radar beam impacts the side of a cylinder. The entire length of the cylinder reflects the radar signal. This is obvious and Gambit has lost his mind in claiming otherwise.Here's a question though: you're using the ray model (with the implicit assumption that the cylinder is very large compared to wavelengths; good in optics, bad in radar). what about diffraction effects of the cylinder? what if the cylinder is conducting?
however, I do remember a physical optics model that takes into account diffraction and interference in Air Power Australia that gave J-20 all directional stealth in 9 wavebands.I've been typing for hours in having to deal with those two guys, who were clearly wrong. I'm sorry, but I'm done for tonight. My eyes hurt.
However, let me say that I've never heard of a cylinder conducting all of the incoming radar energy in the real world. You might be able to build a small laboratory prototype under specialized conditions. However, I'll like to see them build a fully-conducting flying airframe. It's b.s.
Also, why bother stopping at a cylinder? Why not make the whole plane conducting and not worry about stealth shaping at all?
I would put an entirely radar-conducting surface/airframe into the same b.s. heap as plasma stealth and Russian radar blockers. What a bunch of hooey. They never have a reputable citation and keep throwing crazy ideas out there.
It's simple physics to understand the reason that a cylinder is not stealthy. An incoming radar beam impacts the side of a cylinder. The entire length of the cylinder reflects the radar signal. This is obvious and Gambit has lost his mind in claiming otherwise.
]What APA did was effectively hand-waved away such trivialities out of their hostility to the F-35.
[/B]
I like that. I suck at Photochopping stuff but saved a copy of it.
This clearly shows that F35 is degrade version of F22. Less technology, Less stealthier than the original F22. Only speed is Mach 1.6+.USA would never sell a plane (even for friendly country) what could give really hard time for USAF in case of war.
That is the reason why they refuse to sell F-22.
Please...Stop...The F-35 is not any type of 'degradation' of the F-22. The F-35 is a totally different aircraft for a different mission type. Why not say the F-35 is a 'degraded' version of the B-2 since both aircrafts drop bombs?This clearly shows that F35 is degrade version of F22. Less technology, Less stealthier than the original F22. Only speed is Mach 1.6+.
USA is very clever. They have less budget for more F22, That's why USA offered F35 and opened it for export to help same money For F22.
Sir ,i have not been promoted to researcher in my forum just for granted .I like that. I suck at Photochopping stuff but saved a copy of it.