Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. It is a modified WS-10B engine ... nothing really to "claim" hereIs this a 2021 with WS-10B engine modified ?
claimed by ...
New Recruit
According to some self educated stealth expert living in this forum, the name of the parts is the key point to achieve stealthy, no matter it is big or small."CANARDS gives extra surface to the radars"
Hey pakistaniGuy, the engineers at Lockeed Martin, must have made a big mistake, according to your silly theory, because they have designed, a giant flying wing, with wingspan 52.43 m and Wing surface area of 465.5 m².
View attachment 429148
DIMENSIONS:
Length 69.00 ft (21.03 m)
Wingspan 172.00 ft (52.43 m)
Height 17.00 ft (5.18 m)
Wing Area 5,000 ft² (465.5 m²)
With such a giant wing and huge wing surface area, it must be no way stealthy, according to your limited knowledge. I guess, you have never heard of COMPOSITE MATERIALS, and RADAR ABSORBING MATERIAL(RAM) coating to decrease radar signal reflection.
Because @pakistanipower doesn't know what he's talking about ... he equates RCS only to surface area ... idiotAccording to some self educated stealth expert living in this forum, the name of the parts is the key point to achieve stealthy, no matter it is big or small.
The two giant stabilizers generate 0.000000000001m^2 RCS, for it's called Stabilizers which is much closer to "stealthy".
They will lost this 0.000000000001m^2 RCS ability when move to front of the aeroplane and named as canards, that's a joke.
Wings, V-tails, H-Tails: good name.
Canards: bad name
Your question is explained: B-2 is stealthy even the wings are much much much bigger than J-20 canards.
For once, I agree with you. If @pakistanipower equates RCS only to surface area, then he's a bigger idiot than I've previously imagined ... . This proves that he doesn't have the slightest clue of how RCS reduction shaping works ...So this pakistaniGuy really think he will end up with more money, if he moved his wallet from the back, to the front pocket.
Some pakistani village is missing it's village idiot.
With respect Mr. @Figaro you add 2 massive CANARDS in the front of main wing and expect that they don't give the extra return for radars including the main wing, what great logic you have Mr. @FigaroBecause @pakistanipower doesn't know what he's talking about ... he equates RCS only to surface area ... idiot
For once, I agree with you. If @pakistanipower equates RCS only to surface area, then he's a bigger idiot than I've previously imagined ... . This proves that he doesn't have the slightest clue of how RCS reduction shaping works ...
Still need time to tell...let's not try to get ahead of ourself.With respect Mr. @Figaro you add 2 massive CANARDS in the front of main wing and expect that they don't give the extra return for radars including the main wing, what great logic you have Mr. @Figaro
View attachment 429256
look at your self main wing RCS+ CANARD RCS= one added (CANARDS) for increased radar return
PAKFA's lavcon far more better than J-20 massive CANARDS in the term LO or STEALTH gives far less radar returnsView attachment 429257
It honestly seems kinda dumb of you to bash @Asoka posts when you yourself cannot understand the basics of RCS reduction ... . First, the J-20 has closed coupled canard, which differ from the traditional usage. Then again, they are not perpendicular to the main body ... so conventional rules don't apply. Let's not use the words "huge" ... we don't want to sound like a 5 year old @j-20blackdragonWith respect Mr. @Figaro you add 2 massive CANARDS in the front of main wing and expect that they don't give the extra return for radars including the main wing, what great logic you have Mr. @Figaro
View attachment 429256
look at your self main wing RCS+ CANARD RCS= one added (CANARDS) for increased radar return
PAKFA's lavcon far more better than J-20 massive CANARDS in the term LO or STEALTH gives far less radar returnsView attachment 429257
Sir how can you hide 2 massive CANARD surfaces from radars in front of main wings whatever makes these CANARDS composite materials and RAM, i can't understand it or those CANARDS made of some kind of out of this universe materials that totally invisible/transparent to all electromagnetic waves as @Asoka saidStill need time to tell...let's not try to get ahead of ourself.
Sir how can you hide 2 massive CANARD surfaces from radars in front of main wings whatever makes these CANARDS composite materials and RAM, i can't understand it or those CANARDS made of some kind of out of this universe materials that totally invisible/transparent to all electromagnetic waves as @Asoka said close couple CANARDS can't guarantee of reduction of excess radars returns there are currently 3 fighter jets and 1 former jet here it isIt honestly seems kinda dumb of you to bash @Asoka posts when you yourself cannot understand the basics of RCS reduction ... . First, the J-20 has closed coupled canard, which differ from the traditional usage. Then again, they are not perpendicular to the main body ... so conventional rules don't apply. Let's not use the words "huge" ... we don't want to sound like a 5 year old @j-20blackdragon
New Recruit
Sir how can you hide 2 massive CANARD surfaces from radars in front of main wings whatever makes these CANARDS composite materials and RAM, i can't understand it or those CANARDS made of some kind of out of this universe materials that totally invisible/transparent to all electromagnetic waves as @Asoka said
why everybody is still spreading the canard that canards are bad for stealth??????Sir how can you hide 2 massive CANARD surfaces from radars in front of main wings whatever makes these CANARDS composite materials and RAM, i can't understand it or those CANARDS made of some kind of out of this universe materials that totally invisible/transparent to all electromagnetic waves as @Asoka said
Sir how can you hide 2 massive CANARD surfaces from radars in front of main wings whatever makes these CANARDS composite materials and RAM, i can't understand it or those CANARDS made of some kind of out of this universe materials that totally invisible/transparent to all electromagnetic waves as @Asoka said close couple CANARDS can't guarantee of reduction of excess radars returns there are currently 3 fighter jets and 1 former jet here it is
J-10
View attachment 429262
RAFALE
View attachment 429264
GRIPEN
View attachment 429266
AND FORMER MIG-1.44
View attachment 429267
and J-20
View attachment 429276
so kindly please explain me that how can its hide excess radar returns with exception of the main wings
https://www.quora.com/How-do-canards-affect-the-aerodynamics-and-performance-of-a-combat-aircraft
Control surface would only have significantly increased RCS when deflected in big angles.