Superboy
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 6,298
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Can we get over with this subject of backbiting, thankyou.
Funny even an engineer has to go to car dealer to buy a vehicle or did you build you own space odyssey. So stop trying to insulting people being cardealer [u mentioned it several times since yesterday that puts you on the same page] or pizza delivery man all are respectable jobs...PS I do trust North American car dealers they tell you things about vehicles that normally a pakistani engineer in pakistan won't even tell you let alone a pakistani car sales man/dealer in pakistan.
Do let us know technical details of what came from J-10 program into JF-17 apart from KLJ-7 variant of KLJ-10. If the point was to get tech transfer from J-10 into JF-17 that PAF should have settled for J-10 in the first place even with limited numbers [if russians can sell you RD-93 they could have given permission for AL-31], it is highly unlikely J-10 would get anything from JF-17...J-10 program had that DSI upgrade on the board the studied F-16 testbed program.
J-10 is too expensive to serve as the backbone of PAF. It is a medium sized plane like F-16. JF-17 costs about half as much to service compared to J-10. PAF uses medium sized fighters like F-16 and light fighters like JF-17 in a hi lo mix. PAF cannot afford heavy fighters like Su-30. Too expensive to service. JF-17 Block 1's EW is more advanced than that of J-10A, having MAWS that J-10A lacks, plus has a more advanced tail EW.