W.11
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 15,032
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
Kindly clarify above 2 bull $h!ts
barking dogs dont clarify
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kindly clarify above 2 bull $h!ts
My point is that army has become an empire, a state within state, a self aware beast that doesn't want to have any master. Army should be focusing on its core job i.e. to protect the country, not running businesses, real estate and marriage halls.
I am not talking about Eutopian dreams. Tell me why army's budget is not discussed (or rather not allowed to discuss). Tell me why army's account can't be audited by AGP?
barking dogs dont clarify
well dne chaudhry
great statement
Because he is a UK citizen and already in the UK.
moreover, he cannot be tried on the basis of no proof.. which like all our follies on "proofs" for Indian Involvement in Balochistan.. and what not.. we are unable to come up with.
Hot air balloons dont stay up in the air indefinitely...neither does rhetoric from Pakistan.
beta dehan se, karachi me rehna he to tamzir ke dayre me, warna bahere arab me phek den ge zara chid chid ke
karachi tumhara faisalabad nahi he ke police se chitrol hi karwayen ge, seedha bahere arab me phek den ge
Beta sou jao warna zulfiqar papa agaye to bahera arab ki bajaye Internal sindh mai lai jaye gay banana daynay tmhay
for them it all falls in freedom of speech?If facebook, twitter, SMS, mobile phone conversation could be count as evidence which is now adopt in EU, USA & UK then this thug has enough evidence to be trailed and punished but here question; why someone should be trailed if he served for particular interests and worth to let free!
If facebook, twitter, SMS, mobile phone conversation could be count as evidence which is now adopt in EU, USA & UK then this thug has enough evidence to be trailed and punished but here question; why someone should be trailed if he served for particular interests and worth to let free!
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by a public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent states from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema.
2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for the maintaining of the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
In English law, where murder and manslaughter are concerned, the English court has jurisdiction over offences committed abroad, if it was committed by a British citizen (see s9 Offences Against The Person Act 1861 (OAP) and s3 British Nationality Act 1948). In R v Cheong (2006) AER (D) 385 the appellant was living in Guyana in 1983. He shot and killed a man who had just robbed his wife and sister-in-law. Under local law he was charged only with the unlicensed possession of a firearm; but as a British citizen, s9 OAP Act 1861 applied when he returned to England and he was charged with murder.
Ah.. but here is the thing, Facebook, twitter or whatever.. is also subject to interpretation of laws.
BBC - Blogs - College of Journalism - Twitter, Facebook, blogs and the law: an evolving story
Now if those laws cannot be construed as having occurred on, or having affected UK citizens directly with proof.. you have a problem.
for eg.
If you take this
from
Your rights - Article 10: Right to freedom of expression
So here, one cannot actually try AH unless one deems that he has explicitly ordered murder... asking for the breakup of a foreign country or otherwise is not a crime in the UK. The "Bori" comments will not be entertained by any judge either as proof of intent.
Now, where it is possible to get AH is to FIND HIM GUILTY of a crime in Pakistan.. or generate enough "Actual" evidence.. i.e investigative murder cases and so on. After which.. this law may be applicable.
But as I said, where you have TTP terrorists walking free from courts.. you are expecting a miracle.
Beta sou jao warna zulfiqar papa agaye to bahera arab ki bajaye Internal sindh mai lai jaye gay banana daynay tmhay
kahan gya zulfeqar mirza? beta zulfeqar ko MQM ne he danda dya tha,
karachi me nazar ata he ab woh?
nahi ata?
q nahi ata
Ah....
Now, where it is possible to get AH is to FIND HIM GUILTY of a crime in Pakistan.. or generate enough "Actual" evidence.. i.e investigative murder cases and so on. After which.. this law may be applicable.
.
its all foolish political point scoring, he himself knows well nothing will ever happens?
mujhey kam batoo , mien kiya karoon ,mien kiss ko khaaoon?
If facebook, twitter, SMS, mobile phone conversation could be count as evidence which is now adopt in EU, USA & UK then this thug has enough evidence to be trailed and punished...!
.... here question; why someone should be trailed if he served for particular interests and worth to let free!