..... all Kashmiri so called Freedom groups are designated as terrorist organizations by UN and other countries ,your definition of terrorist is different then rest of world , you country considers Osama as hero ........
My friend, You have been grossly misinformed.
The UN has no internationally agreed definition of terrorism and the reason is that some organizations (OIC, Arab League etc.) define terrorism to exclude "armed struggle for liberation" and "self-determination". The member countries (of these organisations) won't accept any definition of terrorism which may declare Palestinian Freedom Fighters as Terrorists. This Dead Lock continues to this day and the UN has not adopted
the convention on international terrorism.
So, as long as the UN does not "define" terrorism, the
Kashmiri Freedom Fighters cannot be declared
Terrorists ..... Their insurgency cannot be declared
legitimate either (until and unless the UN chooses to define terrorism to exclude "armed struggle for liberation" and "self-determination") .....
Various international conventions on terrorism have also pointed out the difference between struggles for self-determination and acts of terrorism.
For example, the UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) on the ‘Definition of Aggression’, adopted in December 1974, in Article 7 states:
‘Nothing in this definition, and in particular Article 3 could in any way prejudice the right of self-determination, freedom, and independence, as derived from the Charter, of peoples forcibly deprived of that right and referred to in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes or other forms of alien domination; or the right of these peoples to struggle to that end and seek and receive support…’
As far as International Law is concerned, the Statute of the International Court of Justice does recognize
the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations as a valid source of International Law. This category may also include the work of organizations and private institutions. Opinions expressed by experts carry significant weight in International Law.
And here is what some experts on International Law have to say regarding the
Kashmiri Freedom Fighters:
(The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) is an international human rights non-governmental organization based in Geneva. The Commission itself is a standing group of 60 eminent jurists(including senior judges, attorneys and academics) dedicated to ensuring respect for international human rights standards through the law. Commissioners are known for their experience, knowledge and fundamental commitment to human rights.)
ICJ sent a fact finding mission to Kashmir in 1995. The final report published not only challenged the accession of Kashmir to India, it went on to say "If as the ICJ mission has concluded , the people of Kashmir have a right for self determination,
it follows that their insurgency is legitimate " ... (p.84-98)
http://www.icj.org/category/publications/reports/page/33/