Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ Joe : Thanks for the response, though I'm sure that in reality people might exist between factions instead of being wholly with one or the other. Having said that where do you think does an individual's right to choose or refuse their past, embrace another's identity or completely reinvent an identity altogether seems like a valid proposition. I think that because all of these 'labels' are after all inventions at one time or another with little relevance barring the fact that at some point in time a group of people realized that because they now spoke the same language, dressed up in the same way, ate the same things, celebrated the same festivals, even looked similar in appearance - They should substantiate or rather christian (in a way!) those similarities by naming themselves such and such a thing hence how all these 'ethno-linguistic' identities were formed.
For example on my Dad's side I'm an ethnic Kashmir on my Mom's side I'm an ethnic Punjabi..now I know for a fact that neither of those two ethnic group's recorded history goes back beyond a few thousand years (lets pick 10,000 as a big round number !) so surely they must have been something else before that ? And if that is true then what would be irrational in say, myself, deciding that here on this day (03/08/2012) I decide that my identity would be that of a 'Newfoundlander' or that of a 'Bengali' and I'd learn all of the things that are traditionally considered the cornerstone of any such identity - language, unique cultural practices etc. The point I'm trying to make is that if these are, at the end of the day, mere 'conscious decisions' on part of any individual then would it seem irrational for a Person 'A' to decide that he'd like to be associated with Ethnicity 'B' instead of the one that he was born in ?
I'd like to add a little more to this as well : Joe, where or rather when do you think is a society radically changed enough for there to be a need for a 'reinvented' or at least 'new' identity ? Which is to say if someone's reference point in life that influences everything that one does from cradle to grave is so radically changed then does one still belong to the same demographic identity or does one have the right to call him/herself something different ? I am of course referring to the spread of Islam in the Indian subcontinent and how Islam by its very nature was both theologically and practically (though regrettably that resulted in a lot of blood spilled too !) different then the original faith and the way of life of the inhabitants of our subcontinent and in being embraced by whole swathes of the population (forcefully or otherwise...the adherence was there !) in some parts of the Indian subcontinent there was, I would assume, a paradigmatic shift in the collective consciousness of the society whereby in many things the rights of yesterday became the wrongs of today and vice versa...and things of a similar connotation. Do you think then would a community or a society be justified in evolving their identity from 'A' to 'Z', should they wish it ?
Of course, this wouldn't be applicable to the areas where a much more syncretic and less...*how should I put this*, theologically and practically confrontationalist Islam took root !
I am fascinated.
May I have your permission to reproduce your note on a private mailing list? I will share the commentary with you if you let me do that.
I'm fond of 'Pan-Islamism' myself but when I talk about that I mean a stronger OIC then its present sorry excuse for an existence and perhaps even a cross between the EU and NATO tailor made for the Muslim World. Having said that I don't see that happening in my life time because it requires a political maturity and political consciousness that none of our nations at presently display...perhaps Turkey does slightly !
good to be politically conscious but a word to the wise, don't go on joining student organizations that often resort to petty thuggery and vandalism. Here in Pakistan the MSF, the BSF, the Jamiat-e-Tulaba and almost every other organization out there is exactly the aforementioned two things. But of course I do apologize if the student wing of the BNP isn't like that...!
^What a bunch of hateful pricks, no doubt birds of feather flock together.
flock together?? Now all of them are Jamati?? ahem! thats a defence page! i dont think MHJ is jamati! He is against rohingya entry inside Bangladesh ! Now we know what common Bangladeshis think about you people!
^What a bunch of hateful pricks, no doubt birds of feather flock together.
when she was attacked by sultan bahadur Shah, she had no other option! Sent a letter to opium addict Humayun to help her with Rakhi to protect her from committing suicide! Bahadur Shah sent a letter to Humayn that He had waged a Jihad and Humayun should keep himself away! But Humayun attacked Sultan Bahdur! His Imam that evening Recited the following Surah in Maghrib prayer to prevent him and was executed for this! Those chicken heart talibans are far better than opium addict Humayn! Sher Shah was thousand times better than him as general as ruler as Muslim LION HEART!
Rakhi bondon akta utshob. It's to strengthen the bond between a brothers and sisters and of course celebration follows suit. You sure bro you are Bangladeshi?? You do know that in Bangladesh we do celebrate a lot of festivals together, or don't you!?
Munāfiq is an Islamic Arabic term used to describe a religious hypocrite, who outwardly practices Islam, while inwardly concealing his disbelief (kufr), perhaps even unknowingly.
Now how does that relates to "Rakhi bandhan'" utshob!!!
Thanks.
I appreciate this post full heatedly. I could not come up with such precise answer. Jazak Allah Khayr.
Thank you.
Rakhi bondon akta utshob.
It's to strengthen the bond between a brothers and sisters and of course celebration follows suit.
You sure bro you are Bangladeshi??
You do know that in Bangladesh we do celebrate a lot of festivals together, or don't you!?
Munāfiq is an Islamic Arabic term used to describe a religious hypocrite, who outwardly practices Islam, while inwardly concealing his disbelief (kufr), perhaps even unknowingly.
Now how does that relates to "Rakhi bandhan'" utshob!!!
Rakhi is also celebrated as Gamha Purnima in Orissa. On this date, all the domesticated Cows and Bullocks are decorated and worshipped.
This is also celebrated as Shri Baladeva birth Ceremony. Lord Krishna's elder Brother Prabhu Balarama was born on this Poornima
this day is celebrated as Narali Purnima. On this day, an offering of a coconut (naral in Marathi) is made to the sea, as a mark of respect to Lord Varuna, the God of the Sea.
In parts of Gujarat, this day is celebrated as Pavitropana. On this day, people perform the grand pooja or the worship of Lord Shiva.
in the state of West Bengal (India), this day is also called Jhulan Purnima. Prayers & puja of Lord Krishna & Radha are performed there. Sisters tie rakhi to Brothers and bestow immortality.
হোম শেষ পাতা হিলি সীমান্তে রাখিবন্ধন উত্সবহিলি সীমান্তে রাখিবন্ধন উত্সব
লেখক: ফুলবাড়ি ও হাকিমপুর সংবাদদাতা |
শুক্রবার, ৩ অগাষ্টu-এ ২০১২, ১৯ শ্রাবণ ১৪১৯
দুই বাংলার মানুষের মিলনমেলা
সীমান্তে সংহতি ও সাম্প্রদায়িক সম্প্রীতি অটুট রাখতে গতকাল বৃহস্পতিবার দিনাজপুরের হাকিমপুরের হিলি সীমান্তে দুই বাংলার মানুষ মেতে উঠেছিল রাখিবন্ধন উত্সবে। আর এ কারণে কিছু সময়ের জন্য হলেও দুই বাংলার মানুষের মিলনমেলায় পরিণত হয়েছিল হিলি সীমান্ত। ভারতের পশ্চিমবঙ্গের পূর্ব মেদিনীপুরের কোলাঘাট ভাষা ও সংস্কৃতি নামের সংগঠন সকাল ১০টায় হিলি সীমান্তের চেকপোস্টের শূন্য রেখায় এই রাখিবন্ধন উত্সবের আয়োজন করে। শুরুতে দুইদেশের জাতীয় সঙ্গীত পরিবেশন করা হয়। পরে হাকিমপুর শিল্পকলা একাডেমি ও ভারতের হিলি শিল্পকলা একাডেমির শিল্পীরা বিজিবি ও বিএসএফ সদস্যসহ আমন্ত্রিত অতিথিদের হাতে রাখি বেঁধে দেন।
এ সময় উপস্থিতৃ ছিলেন বিজিবির হিলি সিপি ক্যাম্প কমান্ডার শহিদুল ইসলাম, সাবেক পৌর মেয়র কামাল হোসেন রাজ, দিনাজপুর প্রেসক্লাবের সভাপতি চিত্ত ঘোষ, হাকিমপুর প্রেসক্লাবের সাবেক সাধারণ সম্পাদক জাহিদুল ইসলাম জাহিদ এবং ভারতের ৯৬বিএসএফ ব্যাটালিয়নের স্টাফ অফিসার নরেশ, সংগ্রাম বিশওয়ালসহ উভয় দেশের সহস্রাধিক নারী-পুরুষ, তরুণ-তরুণী ও শিশু-কিশোর।
A real story based on history how Emperor Humayun of Delhi went to save his Rakhi Bandhan sister Rani Durgabati from the onslaught of a Sultan Bahadur Shah that changed the course of Hindustan's history. Humayun was supposed to rush to Bengal to crush the usurper Sher Khan, but he could not resist the call from his Rakhi sister and went to the west/south (was it Malwar?), instead.
He saved the Rani but Sher Khan consolidated his hold in Bengal during this lapse of time. This finally caused Humayun to leave India, but he never regretted his earler decision to help Rani Durgabati. Muslims are supposed to be lion-hearted like Humayun, and they were always like this during their good days. They were not like present day chicken-hearted small Talibanists who defy a ceremony, an occassion or a goodwill gesture from other religionists that closes the sectarian differences.
A religion is certainly not something like a ladder that automatically takes somebody to the Paradise because he commits himself to certain rituals that really may not purify his heart. I personally find it overwhelming that the Hindu ladies crossed the border and fastened the sacred thread to their otherwise Muslim enemy brothers of BGB. We must respect their goodwill.