Canadian MEN

[hatehs]

There really is a whole world of difference in how people think in opposite parts of the world.

Some men hide behind burkas to bomb innocents, some men are men enough to wear heels to protect their women, pretty easy to figure out who is more manly in this instance.

Side note: hopefully Canada stops these kinda " men" from immigration,they are a big part of why these heels were worn.

Abey Sikhra, do you realize there is a higher rate of domestic violence among non immigrant women? Sikhra talking about men in burka, let's talk about the hairy monkeys hiding their smelly hair in a turbans going after female fetuses. What's the gender ratio for the Sikh community in Canada again?

 

[Rusty2]

It seems that your school never taught you logical thinking. What aim have these clowns achieved? The fact no one here is talking about how to reduce domestic violence indicates that these clowns didn't achieve their aim. If anything this retarded stunt takes the focus away from domestic violence. This stunt indicates that these clowns have no solution for decreasing domestic violence because if they did then we would have been hearing about those solutions instead of this meaningless stunt. Also, what's up with these baseless? Where did I claim to be a holy warrior?

Lol, accuses me of not going to school while talking out of behind.
Anyone one with any sort of real education knows about the problem solving cycle

This is basic bitch shit.
These people are at step one, they are identifying the problem and letting the world know there is one.
You people are upset for two reasons
1. You don't like how they are going about it, which I guess in your minds makes the cause illegitimate.
and 2. You people don't think this is a problem and want to continue to beat your wives.
Either way, it's your problem and not theirs.

Don't take offence to this, but it seems like you are suffering from inferiority complex.

Where the hell did "Mullahs" come from? Why are so quick to draw conclusions?

I often see an undertone of hatred towards Pakistani culture/traditions in your comments. Always something negative. Try to reflect on it.

Don't take offense to this but please stop beating your wives.

I have a hatred for hypocrisy and injustice, which you people are more than happy to partake it.
Someone says something slight negative against Islam, you people LOSE YOUR MINDS
Someone LITERALLY beating their wives... lol, get rekt.
So all I am trying to do is make comparisons in the only language you people understand.
So question still stands, why is no one getting upset at mullahs putting on burqas?

 

[El Sidd]

Lol, accuses me of not going to school while talking out of behind.
Anyone one with any sort of real education knows about the problem solving cycle

This is basic bitch shit.
These people are at step one, they are identifying the problem and letting the world know there is one.
You people are upset for two reasons
1. You don't like how they are going about it, which I guess in your minds makes the cause illegitimate.
and 2. You people don't think this is a problem and want to continue to beat your wives.
Either way, it's your problem and not theirs.

1. For Pakistanis its hard to understand that why Canada is stuck at step 1. Just because the climate is still from the ice age, doesn't mean the human thought has not progressed beyond the insulation of the thick ice of your skull.

2. You would have to travel quite deep in rural Pakistan to encounter such primitive behaviour but apparently this is an urban problem in Canada.

Why do you insist on projecting Canadian problems on Pakistani society?

 

[Rusty2]

Yeah, talking about and making fun of, are not the same things. And you need to dial down the name calling. You make good points. Don't need to resort to name calling. The guy you are tagging is a very rational person and the last person you'd call a holy warrior. You'd know that if you weren't blinded by rage.


According to you, we holy warriors don't care about this stuff. So, question is what are you doing? Seeing as you are so passionate about this.

1. I am no beating my wife
2. I am passionately making arguments on PDF on why you guys should not as well.
I know I am pissing in the ocean but I hope that one day, one of you will say "You know... Rusty was dick, but he is kinda right, I should not beat my wife"

Ultimately It upsets me that you people get more worked up defending Allah, the creator of ALL things, a being that has no need for you or your pathetic defense, but mock others who want to defend actual helpless people.

 

[Dalit]

The Western world in general is losing it.

 

[NagaBaba]

they are the one of most highly progressive society

 

[That Guy]

This meaningless attention-seeking stunt will do nothing to solve domestic violence issues.

First I'm pretty sure this is really old.

Second, it actually did raise a lot of awareness. It may not stop domestic violence, but it put it in front of everyone's minds.

I just wanna point out to the Pakistanis here that you guys have no leg to stand on right now.

You can criticize this all you want, but in the end Canada is a rich developed country, and Pakistan is run by corrupt dynasties seeking to rule as kings, not as elected officials.

Worry about your own domestic situation first.

 

[Foinikas]

Let's have a look at Canadian Men:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1649224097405050887

https://twitter.com/x/status/1649353738111561728

This is not enough.

THEY / THEM should wear LINGERI next time.

I'm sorry,did you just assume their gender?

 

[_NOBODY_]

Lol, accuses me of not going to school while talking out of behind.
Anyone one with any sort of real education knows about the problem solving cycle

This is basic bitch shit.
These people are at step one, they are identifying the problem and letting the world know there is one.
You people are upset for two reasons
1. You don't like how they are going about it, which I guess in your minds makes the cause illegitimate.
and 2. You people don't think this is a problem and want to continue to beat your wives.
Either way, it's your problem and not theirs.

Lmao you are proving my point. I too have studied the process of problem-solving in great detail. The problem isn't being identified but it has already been identified, the problem is domestic violence against women. This stunt by itself certainly isn't the solution to this problem. Let's assume that these politicians actually care about domestic violence against women. If we assume this is to be the case then this stunt is probably part of a multistage solution. Now let's analyze this stunt in particular. This stunt was most likely done to raise awareness for this matter. However, a stunt like this does more harm to the cause of decreasing domestic violence against women. This stunt makes the issue of domestic violence look minuscule. I would go as far as to say that this stunt makes a complete mockery of women and the issue of domestic violence. The messaging makes zero sense. How do male Canadian politicians wearing heels represent domestic violence against women or a potential solution for it?

 

[_NOBODY_]

First I'm pretty sure this is really old.

Second, it actually did raise a lot of awareness. It may not stop domestic violence, but it put it in front of everyone's minds.

I just wanna point out to the Pakistanis here that you guys have no leg to stand on right now.

You can criticize this all you want, but in the end Canada is a rich developed country, and Pakistan is run by corrupt dynasties seeking to rule as kings, not as elected officials.

Worry about your own domestic situation first.

The messaging makes zero sense. Unclear messaging always does more harm than good. This kind of senseless messaging makes the issue of domestic violence look minuscule. How do male Canadian politicians wearing heels represent domestic violence against women or a potential solution for it? A logical thing to do would be to present multiple potential solutions to the parliament and debate about what kinds of solutions need to be implemented and which of these solutions will be most effective.

For those who don't understand there are five types of solutions to a problem:

• Corrective Solution: A solution that corrects or fixes the root cause of the problem.
• Adaptive Solution: A solution that accommodates the problem. It's a workaround that doesn't fix the root cause but reduces the impact of the problem.
• Interm Solution: An interim solution is a make-do type of solution. It puts a temporary bandage on the problem. It can buy you time while you continue to search for something better.
• Contingent Solution: A contingent solution is a backup plan. You have it ready in advance in case the problem develops sometime in the future.
• Preventive Solution: A preventive solution is created before a problem occurs, but you don't just keep it ready, you implement it. So that the problem is prevented and will never occur.

Male Canadian politicians wearing heels to raise awareness for domestic violence against women doesn't seem like any of these solutions to me.

What does me being a Pakistani have to do with this? Have you ever seen me compare Pakistan with Canada? I am a resident of Earth and have every right to speak about any part of the world that I please just like you. I see you routinely criticize the politicians of Pakistan and you have every right to do so. So why do you have an issue with me commenting on Canadian issues? Are outsiders not allowed to comment on Canada's issues? You could have stated this if I was trolling but where do you see me trolling here?

 

[Mohsin A]

Let's have a look at Canadian Men:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1649224097405050887

https://twitter.com/x/status/1649353738111561728

This is not enough.

THEY / THEM should wear LINGERI next time.

 

[Rusty2]

Lmao you are proving my point. I too have studied the process of problem-solving in great detail. The problem isn't being identified but it has already been identified, the problem is domestic violence against women. This stunt by itself certainly isn't the solution to this problem. Let's assume that these politicians actually care about domestic violence against women. If we assume this is to be the case then this stunt is probably part of a multistage solution. Now let's analyze this stunt in particular. This stunt was most likely done to raise awareness for this matter. However, a stunt like this does more harm to the cause of decreasing domestic violence against women. This stunt makes the issue of domestic violence look minuscule. I would go as far as to say that this stunt makes a complete mockery of women and the issue of domestic violence. The messaging makes zero sense. How do male Canadian politicians wearing heels represent domestic violence against women or a potential solution for it?

holy shit, imagine you put this effort into NOT beating your wife as you are into ... whatever this is.
By your very same logic, we should ban Dawa, people already know about Islam. Why have preachers who go around telling people about Islam?
Why don't you apply your BS standards to Islam?

 

[Mohsin A]

 

[_NOBODY_]

holy shit, imagine you put this effort into NOT beating your wife as you are into ... whatever this is.
By your very same logic, we should ban Dawa, people already know about Islam. Why have preachers who go around telling people about Islam?
Why don't you apply your BS standards to Islam?

Logic really isn't your strong suit. Where do you see me advocating for banning male Canadians from wearing heels? I am a strong believer in freedom of speech and male Canadians should be able to wear whatever they want to as long as their privates are covered. Let's talk about this Dawa example of yours. Will selling hummus spread awareness about Islam? Selling hummus for spreading awareness about Islam seems like an incredibly retarded thing to do because the messaging makes zero sense just like male Canadian politicians wearing heels to raise awareness about domestic violence against women makes zero sense.

 

[That Guy]

The messaging makes zero sense. Unclear messaging always does more harm than good. This kind of senseless messaging makes the issue of domestic violence look minuscule. How do male Canadian politicians wearing heels represent domestic violence against women or a potential solution for it? A logical thing to do would be to present multiple potential solutions to the parliament and debate about what kinds of solutions need to be implemented and which of these solutions will be most effective.

For those who don't understand there are five types of solutions to a problem:

• Corrective Solution: A solution that corrects or fixes the root cause of the problem.
• Adaptive Solution: A solution that accommodates the problem. It's a workaround that doesn't fix the root cause but reduces the impact of the problem.
• Interm Solution: An interim solution is a make-do type of solution. It puts a temporary bandage on the problem. It can buy you time while you continue to search for something better.
• Contingent Solution: A contingent solution is a backup plan. You have it ready in advance in case the problem develops sometime in the future.
• Preventive Solution: A preventive solution is created before a problem occurs, but you don't just keep it ready, you implement it. So that the problem is prevented and will never occur.

Male Canadian politicians wearing heels to raise awareness for domestic violence against women doesn't seem like any of these solutions to me.

What does me being a Pakistani have to do with this? Have you ever seen me compare Pakistan with Canada? I am a resident of Earth and have every right to speak about any part of the world that I please just like you. I see you routinely criticize the politicians of Pakistan and you have every right to do so. So why do you have an issue with me commenting on Canadian issues? Are outsiders not allowed to comment on Canada's issues? You could have stated this if I was trolling but where do you see me trolling here?

The issue was that people said that wearing high heels was basically asking to be sexually harassed, or showed promiscuity.

It wasn't meant to be a solution, and that's where you're getting stuck.

In the world of politics, things like...

Problem ---> solution

...doesn't exist.

In reality it's....

Problem ----> raise awareness ----> lobby ----> raise funds ----> use the funds to put pressure ----> find a solution ----> solution.