What's new

Burning beam target: US Navy may deploy lasers in four years

lem34

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Burning beam target: US Navy may deploy lasers in four years


Published: 31 March, 2012, 16:44


The US Navy hopes to have operational laser cannons on their ships within the next four years. They will be used against fast-moving targets like cruise missiles, speedboats and drones.

*The Navy hopes to have a working prototype for the futuristic laser weapon within two years, Wired reports.

“The contract will probably have options go through four years, but depending on which laser source the vendors pick, we may be able to demo something after two years,” says Roger McGiness, who works on laser tech at the Office of Naval Research (ONR).

Mike Deitchman, who oversees future weapons development for ONR, says in a month or two his directorate will hold an informal idea session with industry representatives. A contract for building a prototype may be sealed by the end of the year.

The development comes after the Navy decided laser weapons technology is mature enough for deployment. The tipping point was last April’s test of a 15-kilowatt beam solid state laser, which managed to set afire the target ship’s engine. The target was moving at a distance of almost 2 km from the laser-equipped destroyer.

It’s not clear how ONR’s proceeding with a relatively low-power laser will affect research of a more powerful megawatt-scale weapon under the Free Electro Laser project. The Navy hopes to develop a more powerful scalable weapon using magnets rather than a crystal as the gain medium. It could be used against heavily-armored vessels as opposed to unarmored aircraft and boats.

However, such a laser remains elusive after a decade of research. Engineers still have no idea how to scale down such a device to fit onto a vessel or how to produce enough power onboard to feed it.

“It’s easier to shrink down a solid-state laser, and there’s a maturity here, vice the Free Electron Laser,” Deitchman explained. “The solid-state laser will still deal with many asymmetric threats, but not the most hardened, most challenging threats. It’s near-to-mid term. The Free Electron Laser is still long-term.”

Futuristic laser weapons are not the only ones the US Navy hopes to deploy. In February, ONR announced it had started testing for the first industry prototype of an electromagnetic railgun launcher. The weapon uses powerful magnetic fields to accelerate a conductive projectile to speeds of thousands of meters per second – enough to throw it hundreds of kilometers.

http://rt.com/news/laser-cannons-usa-four-years-926/
 
. .
They make this, then the outside world will make something to counter.

in between usa will wasted billion of dollars as usual.
 
.
Laser weapons have been illegalized by the UN. :whistle:
 
.
Laser weapons have been illegalized by the UN. :whistle:

Says who ? Then why do you find so many laser guided weapons ?

I think you meant laser pointers

green-laser-pointer.jpg
 
.
I mean laser weapons that can burn through someone's skin and kill someone in battle. Those are illegalized.
 
.
I mean laser weapons that can burn through someone's skin and kill someone in battle. Those are illegalized.
Why?? The potential for laser weaponary is huge - if made mature enough you can shoot down targets many kilometers away before the target can react ( as the laser will reach it instantly ) - if coupled with a powerful radar for targeting and given a decent range of about 50 -80km it will be the ultimate SAM - no plane or missile will be fast enough to shoot it down or even escape.
 
.
Why?? The potential for laser weaponary is huge - if made mature enough you can shoot down targets many kilometers away before the target can react ( as the laser will reach it instantly ) - if coupled with a powerful radar for targeting and given a decent range of about 50 -80km it will be the ultimate SAM - no plane or missile will be fast enough to shoot it down or even escape.

Those are really dangerous... Plus they give a huge advantage over enemy like nuclear weapons... Not good idea.
 
.
Those are really dangerous... Plus they give a huge advantage over enemy like nuclear weapons... Not good idea.
By that logic even nukes are not a good idea - but at the end of the day its nukes that kept peace between USSR and USA and its nukes that keep the peace between India and Pakistan.
 
.
By that logic even nukes are not a good idea - but at the end of the day its nukes that kept peace between USSR and USA and its nukes that keep the peace between India and Pakistan.

not really. It's India's restraint more than Pakistani nukes.
 
. . .
not really. It's India's restraint more than Pakistani nukes.
Trust me buddy - its the nukes - India restrains herself mainly because Pakistan has such an unpredictable nuclear policy - of course there are other factors such as international politics involved as well but Nukes play a huge role in keeping the peace.
Anyways getting off course here.... lets get back to topic....
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom