What's new

Brief profiles of terrorists involved in the Karachi bus attack/Sabeen murder

Na te-raw na me-raw.

No rawrrrr?

Its been complete ten years terror attacks happening still someone says it is RAW someone says it is ISI behind it. Abhi tak picture clear ni kamal he bhai. I can walk in my house closed eyes i know where to step.

Whats wrong?
 
Unfounded Pakistani claims of foreign involvement are a joke and repetition by high officials is a reminder of how dishonorable they are.

That said, where did these guys get their training on guns, surveillance, and so on? What will be their fate: investigation and public prosecution, murder in prison, or escape? Any outcome but the first will suggest involvement by the Pakistani "deep state" of unaccountable actors wielding state power.
 
Unfounded Pakistani claims of foreign involvement are a joke and repetition by high officials is a reminder of how dishonorable they are.

You are right. It makes it difficult for one to choose most dishonourable liar. US government and officials who claimed in UN about existence of Iraqi WMD or Pakistanis?! On second thought, given hundreds of thousands killed by US and still being killed as a consequent prize of most dishonourable shameless liar goes to US officials. Here is your medal!
 
If you read Pakistani English newspaper. They are most of them fake liberals. As soon as Sabeen was killed, for days there were articles alleging ISI being behind the attack. That before investigation was completed.

Also, there were articles about 'rights' of Baloch and written by people who have not travelled to Lasbela from Karachi.
Some people who think they know it all jumped to conclusions and blamed ISI for Sabeen's murder. That's what he's referring to.
i agree
 
Kuch ho na ho @Xarvan & company ko tou chullu bhar pani koi deede:coffee:
 
If you read Pakistani English newspaper. They are most of them fake liberals. As soon as Sabeen was killed, for days there were articles alleging ISI being behind the attack. That before investigation was completed.

Also, there were articles about 'rights' of Baloch and written by people who have not travelled to Lasbela from Karachi.
I believe there is difference between liberals and those who are anti-Army/anti-Pakistan, those who use newspapers such as 'Dawn' and 'Express Tribune' and media outlets such as 'Geo' to spread their propaganda.
Agreed. I prefer to use the term ''pseudo-liberals'' for those people.
Everybody who opposes so-called religious morons and their tyranny is liberal,
This I disagree with. Liberal means someone who is willing to accept others' opinions and tolerate difference of opinion. Some of the people who oppose religious morons take it too far and oppose religion entirely - that is not liberalism, since that means they are not tolerant towards religion.
Their religious/ideological affiliation is written all over their ugly faces. When I see anybody, anybody with a beard, and a woman hiding her face behind a veil, I maintain at-least 5 feet distance from such people.
Sir, boycotting 'anybody with a beard' is taking it too far. And some women actually prefer the veil; Liberalism would mean accepting that opinion. Of course, extremists who actively oppress women are to be opposed at all time - but that can't be judged from their appearance or beard

Admittedly though, the man in the two pictures to the right has a certain kind of 'phatkaar' in his eyes, as is typical of terrorists.
 
I may be wrong but in my experience those who sport beards (religious type) and hide themselves behind the veils (no such thing as veil in Muhammed PBUH's Islam) are only inches away from becoming extremists.
Ok we both can agree that people can be wrong not beards and veils irrespective of religion, sect, caste or political affiliation
 
You are right. It makes it difficult for one to choose most dishonourable liar. US government and officials who claimed in UN about existence of Iraqi WMD or Pakistanis?! On second thought, given hundreds of thousands killed by US and still being killed as a consequent prize of most dishonourable shameless liar goes to US officials. Here is your medal!
Thanks, but I really can't accept it. After all, to pin a "lie" on the U.S. you had to go back over a dozen years, to an incident supported by practically all intelligence agencies in the West - that is, it was honored as the best intelligence available.

As for the mess in Mesopotamia, don't you think you are confusing honor with stupidity?
 
Clearly their foreign handlers dug hard in their brains. This shows that how much freely foreign agencies & their bastards are operating in Pakistan. Corrupt politicians are not keen to solve these issues at all, they are not even bothered.
 
What lies of liberal? These terrorists belong to a sleeper cell, which belongs to some 'religious' fanatic group, some name Al-Qaeda. These terrorists are just like many of those who could communicate in English and post on the fora in defense of terrorism. Because they are not doing it in a Madrassas or using a Mosque's loudspeaker does not acquit them from them being mouthpieces of terror and extremisms.

Studied in well known and prestigious universities but roamed unsurprisingly with Mullahs to get to this murderous and pure evil state! A lot of people were pointing finger at secular institutions because of the news of involvement of highly educated students in the attack saying how they should be closed even though there's no precedent of them providing foot soldiers/leaders to terrorists and extremist organizations or imparting radicalization and extremism into young minds, they aren't doing it now. Investigators revealed a lot of details concerning these three kids from good backgrounds. Religious overdose, as it usually is, at it again.
 
this is what happens in high profile cases like Ismaelies massacre. had it been an ordinary killing it would have gone below the rug
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom