duhastmish
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2009
- Messages
- 4,302
- Reaction score
- -4
Na te-raw na me-raw.
No rawrrrr?
No rawrrrr?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Na te-raw na me-raw.
No rawrrrr?
Unfounded Pakistani claims of foreign involvement are a joke and repetition by high officials is a reminder of how dishonorable they are.
New Recruit
If you read Pakistani English newspaper. They are most of them fake liberals. As soon as Sabeen was killed, for days there were articles alleging ISI being behind the attack. That before investigation was completed.
Also, there were articles about 'rights' of Baloch and written by people who have not travelled to Lasbela from Karachi.
i agreeSome people who think they know it all jumped to conclusions and blamed ISI for Sabeen's murder. That's what he's referring to.
If you read Pakistani English newspaper. They are most of them fake liberals. As soon as Sabeen was killed, for days there were articles alleging ISI being behind the attack. That before investigation was completed.
Also, there were articles about 'rights' of Baloch and written by people who have not travelled to Lasbela from Karachi.
Agreed. I prefer to use the term ''pseudo-liberals'' for those people.I believe there is difference between liberals and those who are anti-Army/anti-Pakistan, those who use newspapers such as 'Dawn' and 'Express Tribune' and media outlets such as 'Geo' to spread their propaganda.
This I disagree with. Liberal means someone who is willing to accept others' opinions and tolerate difference of opinion. Some of the people who oppose religious morons take it too far and oppose religion entirely - that is not liberalism, since that means they are not tolerant towards religion.Everybody who opposes so-called religious morons and their tyranny is liberal,
Sir, boycotting 'anybody with a beard' is taking it too far. And some women actually prefer the veil; Liberalism would mean accepting that opinion. Of course, extremists who actively oppress women are to be opposed at all time - but that can't be judged from their appearance or beardTheir religious/ideological affiliation is written all over their ugly faces. When I see anybody, anybody with a beard, and a woman hiding her face behind a veil, I maintain at-least 5 feet distance from such people.
Ok we both can agree that people can be wrong not beards and veils irrespective of religion, sect, caste or political affiliationI may be wrong but in my experience those who sport beards (religious type) and hide themselves behind the veils (no such thing as veil in Muhammed PBUH's Islam) are only inches away from becoming extremists.
Thanks, but I really can't accept it. After all, to pin a "lie" on the U.S. you had to go back over a dozen years, to an incident supported by practically all intelligence agencies in the West - that is, it was honored as the best intelligence available.You are right. It makes it difficult for one to choose most dishonourable liar. US government and officials who claimed in UN about existence of Iraqi WMD or Pakistanis?! On second thought, given hundreds of thousands killed by US and still being killed as a consequent prize of most dishonourable shameless liar goes to US officials. Here is your medal!
What lies of liberal? These terrorists belong to a sleeper cell, which belongs to some 'religious' fanatic group, some name Al-Qaeda. These terrorists are just like many of those who could communicate in English and post on the fora in defense of terrorism. Because they are not doing it in a Madrassas or using a Mosque's loudspeaker does not acquit them from them being mouthpieces of terror and extremisms.