Breaking: US Navy destroyer intercepts multiple missiles off the coast of Yemen

[Stranagor]

LMAO! You certainly have no idea what you are talking about. When did US brought carrier strike groups to protect Rohingya Muslim? US giving 10 billions dollars worth of weapons to already powerful Israel right now, brought full load of 2 aircraft carriers and you have audacity to compare it with Rohingya or chechans which US wanted only to use.

US never wants to use Israel against any other country. Protection of Israel is in US constitution. Extremely powerful lobby in US ensures that Israel is given protection & priority over even America's own interests.

Your other examples are hillarious too. Nothing remotely compares the relationship of US & Israel.

You put entire Islamic block of countries at one side and put Israel at other side and ask US to choose a side. US will 100% pick Israel. That's as clear as anything.

When did China or Russia bring AC group to protect Rohingya Muslims?

Instead, they have supplied Myanmar military with advanced military platforms. The US has heavily sanctioned them. Put them on the state department genocide list.

Don't get caught up with relationship between Israel and US. Iran has good relations with Russia and Armenia, too.

Why doesn't, say, Iran, recognize the Muslim majority Kosovo?

Explain the relationship between Chechen killing Russia and Iran, or Qatar and Hamas which assisted ISIS and AQ during the Syrian civil war?

Before launching your anti-US jihad, you have lots of home cleaning to do.

 

[Haldorss]

or Qatar and Hamas which assisted ISIS and AQ during the Syrian civil war

It makes more sense if it was a conspiracy to make refugees go into europe. That aligns with Zio-Anglosaxons who are anti-europe. None of the refugees went into five eyes, immune like israel. Call it an anti-European alliance.

 

[Stranagor]

Agree, I never said 'absolute boycott'. I am just against total dependence. All eggs cannot be in the same basket. Why US used to twist anyone's arm was because it had all the cards all the time. That's changing slowly.

Exactly. Look how the UEA is diversifying its economy into software, IT and other sectors. That's the right attitude.

***

The bulk of FDI is concentrated in the sectors of trade, real estate, finance and insurance, manufacturing, mining and construction. The main investors are the United Kingdom, India, the United States, France and Saudi Arabia. According to Investment Monitor, in 2021, Dubai ranked first globally in terms of number of FDI projects, recording 441 projects, an 87% increase year-on-year.

The U.S. was the main investor (87 projects), followed by the UK (71) and India (60). 26% of these projects were in the software and IT services sector, 17% in business and professional services, and 8% in tourism. Furthermore, Dubai attracted a record 492 FDI projects during H1/2022 (+80.2% year-on-year), with greenfield projects accounting for a 56% share of the total (official governmental figures).

Foreign direct investment (FDI) in the United Arab Emirates - International Trade Portal

Learn about the foreign investment climate in the United Arab Emirates including information on the country's FDI attractiveness, market disadvantages and FDI support.

www.lloydsbanktrade.com

 

[Haldorss]

It makes more sense if it was a conspiracy to make refugees go into europe. That aligns with Zio-Anglosaxons who are anti-europe. None of the refugees went into five eyes, immune like israel. Call it an anti-European alliance.

Also anti-syria would weaken Russia, which Anglosaxons wanted

 

[Stranagor]

LMAO! You certainly have no idea what you are talking about. When did US brought carrier strike groups to protect Rohingya Muslim? US giving 10 billions dollars worth of weapons to already powerful Israel right now, brought full load of 2 aircraft carriers and you have audacity to compare it with Rohingya or chechans which US wanted only to use.

US never wants to use Israel against any other country. Protection of Israel is in US constitution. Extremely powerful lobby in US ensures that Israel is given protection & priority over even America's own interests.

Your other examples are hillarious too. Nothing remotely compares the relationship of US & Israel.

You put entire Islamic block of countries at one side and put Israel at other side and ask US to choose a side. US will 100% pick Israel. That's as clear as anything.

When did China or Russia bring AC group to Myanmar to protect Rohingya Muslims? In fact, China and Russia have been militarily arming Myanmar which ethnically cleanse Rohingyas.

Why is not the protection of Chechnya, Rohingya or Yemen not in Russian or Chinese Constitution? (By the way, your claim about the US Constitution is factually wrong, if not academically dishonest).

The relationship between China and NK is similar. They have mutual defense pact.

The relationship between NATO countries is the same. They have defense pact. You attack Turkey or Greece or Germany, NATO comes to help.

You put entire Sunni countries on one side and Shia Hezbollah on the other, Iran will choose Shia Hezbollah. That's obvious. Iran daily kills Muslims. Qatar helped kill so many Syrian Muslims.

 

[HGV]

You put entire Sunni countries on one side and Shia Hezbollah on the other, Iran will choose Shia Hezbollah. That's obvious. Iran daily kills Muslims. Qatar helped kill so many Syrian Muslims.

Since you are so driven by sectarianism, it is important to note that Iran has the best relations with Sunni Syria, which was one of the only countries to come to Iran's aid when invaded by Saddam's Iraq in 1980, and Iran returned the favour by coming to Syria's aid when under a Western-backed global jihadi attack.

Your sectarianism stinks and you can shove it.

 

[Mehdipersian]

When did China or Russia bring AC group to Myanmar to protect Rohingya Muslims? In fact, China and Russia have been militarily arming Myanmar which ethnically cleanse Rohingyas.

Why is not the protection of Chechnya, Rohingya or Yemen not in Russian or Chinese Constitution? (By the way, your claim about the US Constitution is factually wrong, if not academically dishonest).

The relationship between China and NK is similar. They have mutual defense pact.

The relationship between NATO countries is the same. They have defense pact. You attack Turkey or Greece or Germany, NATO comes to help.

You put entire Sunni countries on one side and Shia Hezbollah on the other, Iran will choose Shia Hezbollah. That's obvious. Iran daily kills Muslims. Qatar helped kill so many Syrian Muslims.

Iran only kills terrorists, whatever religion they want to have

 

[Muhammad Saftain Anjum]

Any one can put some two stages together and say hey i have very loong range Ballistic Missile but building a reliable Missile is a different ball-game.

 

[大汉奸柳传志]

The US has up to 1,000 vertical launch cells in the region. Nobody is overwhelming the USN

Your SM-6 cost like 4 mil per launch while a Shahed only 20k a piece, they no need to overwhelm your defense in one go

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1715443395391291624

https://twitter.com/x/status/1715443900238704712

 

[LeGenD]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1715443395391291624

https://twitter.com/x/status/1715443900238704712

This clearly shows that the warship can detect, track, and defeat drones.

The news and footage of an Iranian drone observing an American warship in earlier days is due to the warship allowing it to.

 

[AZMwi]

!!جنگل میں مور ناچا کس نے دیکھا

 

[Stranagor]

Iran only kills terrorists, whatever religion they want to have

Your terrorist is someone else's freedom fighter.

i24NEWS

www.i24news.tv

 

[Mehdipersian]

Your terrorist is someone else's freedom fighter.

i24NEWS

www.i24news.tv

Terorism is a behaviour.
You can be a freedom fighter without terrorist acts

 

[Oldman1]

assume fake news, if Houthis have missiles of such range, it is very precious, meant to be used wisely, not like this.

Used wisely how? The purpose of this attack was to show their support in attacking Israel with the backing and support by Iran. If the U.S. destroyer wasn't there, could have been different outcome.