What's new

#BREAKING: US Navy destroyer came under attempted missile attack in intl waters off Yemen, ship not

Now divulge into history. It has now been proven that it was the US warship that fired on the North Vietnamese vessels but US claimed otherwise and Congress approved bombing of North Vietnam starting the Vietnam War.
Why not use e.g. the Spanish-American war to explain away the attack on USS Cole?

Additionally, ever since some idiotic Iranian students put US embassy under siege following the Iranian revolution, US public opinion has been justifiably anti-Iran. Add to this the fact that both the Israeli and the Saudi lobbies have been busy to keep anti-Iranian sentiments on the boil since 1979. Consequently US adopted highly biased anti Iran policies. For example

- In 1980 all the Kuwaiti vessels were re-registered as US flag ships so that if Iran attacked Kuwait vessels, US could retaliate against Iran.

- On July 3, 1988 USS Vincent fired two missiles and shot a civilian flight from Tehran to Dubai killing 300 passengers. US Navy claimed that the Captain mistook A300 airbus to be an F-14. Wonder how that idiot rose to command a US warship?

In view of the above, pray tell me; am I totally wrong in being sceptical?

Reflagging was a good protective measure. The intent was to protect tanker traffic, not to have an excuse to hit Iran (I doubt the US would need an excuse). It is unrelated to todays incident.

The so-called "Tanker War" started when Iraq attacked the oil terminal and oil tankers at Kharg Island in early 1984. Saddam's aim in attacking Iranian shipping was to provoke the Iranians to retaliate with extreme measures, such as closing the Strait of Hormuz to all maritime traffic, thereby bringing American intervention: the United States had threatened several times to intervene if the Strait of Hormuz were closed. As such, the Iranians limited their retaliatory attacks to Iraqi shipping, leaving the strait open to general passage.
As a first response to these attacks, Iran attacked a Kuwaiti tanker carrying Iraqi oil near Bahrain on 13 May 1984, as well as a Saudi tanker in Saudi waters on 16 May. Because Iraq had become landlocked during the invasion, they had to rely on their Arab allies, primarily Kuwait, to transport their oil. Iran attacked tankers carrying Iraqi oil from Kuwait, later attacking tankers from any Persian Gulf state supporting Iraq. Attacks on ships of noncombatant nations in the Persian Gulf sharply increased thereafter, with both nations attacking oil tankers and merchant ships of neutral nations in an effort to deprive their opponent of trade
Lloyd's of London, a British insurance market, estimated that the Tanker War damaged 546 commercial vessels and killed about 430 civilian sailors. The largest portion of the attacks was directed by Iraq against vessels in Iranian waters, with the Iraqis launching three times as many attacks as the Iranians. But Iranian speedboat attacks on Kuwaiti shipping led Kuwait to formally petition foreign powers on 1 November 1986 to protect its shipping. The Soviet Union agreed to charter tankers starting in 1987, and the United States Navy offered to provide protection for foreign tankers reflagged and flying the U.S. flag starting 7 March 1987 in Operation Earnest Will. Neutral tankers shipping to Iran were unsurprisingly not protected by Earnest Will, resulting in reduced foreign tanker traffic to Iran, since they risked Iraqi air attack.
During the course of the war, Iran attacked two Soviet Navy ships which were protecting Kuwaiti tankers.

The 1988 USS Vincennes (not Vincent) / Iran Air Flight 655 incident was tragic. It has nothing to do with, nor does it have baring on the events we're discussing here today.
 
.
Attack on Navy ship in Yemen 15 Hours Ago | 00:32
A U.S. Navy guided missile destroyer was targeted on Sunday in a failed missile attack from territory in Yemen controlled by Iran-aligned Houthi rebels, a U.S. military spokesman told Reuters
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/09/us-n...eted-in-failed-missile-attack-from-yemen.html

The navy spokesperson only says where the missile originated from, and speaks not about the specific type of missile
 
. . .
Since this is PDF, Its noteworthy that the Missiles Fired were : C 802 which 70x ordered by PN and arms the F-22P

The question is does IN have similar soft kill capabilities like USN? PN will not fight any war with USN and they have very advance version of C-802s not the old ones like this used by Yemen.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom