Amaa'n
STAFF
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 10,660
- Reaction score
- 149
- Country
- Location
He has his pov --- try countering with factsO bhai! @Syed.Ali.Haider kuch sharam karlo or nooray ko defend karna chorh do ab .............
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has his pov --- try countering with factsO bhai! @Syed.Ali.Haider kuch sharam karlo or nooray ko defend karna chorh do ab .............
Then we agree that the Army continues to act outside the Constitution. This is good for the Army but bad for Pakistan. Clearly.
Oh yes uncle i have read that and so did the ones by UK and EU, a soft coup was needed and US was on board with it ---- they needed tonensure a stable and credible person in driving seat on this side of the border --
And what do you have to say about NS's statement in the morning and now DG ISPR???
I thought it was understood that army had a say in certain policies. The argument of involvement of army in sit-ins to snatch powers for policy making holds no ground for a fact that developments happened lately don't support the assumptions.
Dont you get it, gov asked army to intervene.The Armed Forces deserve to be supported only when they are doing their duty and not when they commit unlawful actions that are beyond their constitutional role.
Can't the international community or U.S specifically with its weight play a role to change this hold of the establishment on power ? you know & I know that @ this juncture if some one strengthen the root of democracy & give the democratic forces strength then it is the U.S , all is needed now, is a little bit of arm twisting of the establishment & that is something the U.S with its weight & clout can very well & easily do then why isn't it doing it ?The Army is doing exactly as it wants to, it will remains unchallenged in its hold on power.
power understands the language of power only, & it is then, that the language of the one with greater power is chosen
Dont you get it, gov asked army to intervene.
Did you forget few weeks ago Army made it clear to gov to sort out political issues on their own???
But yesterday they requested again and army agreex.
Yes, vut do you still want me to stand behind a person who is in voilation of Article 43?? He stood on the floor of the house and lied to the whole world --- and lied to me ---- so i think he lost the credibility --- i want someone new to represent me ---Of course USA will work with any one in Pakistan that furthers its own national interests, whether they are good for Pakistan or not. That is something Pakistan needs to sort out for itself.
Can't the international community or U.S specifically with its weight play a role to change this trend ? you know & I know that @ this juncture if some one strengthen the root of democracy & give the democratic forces strength then it is the U.S , all is needed now, is a little bit of arm twisting of the establishment & that is something the U.S with its weight & clout can very well & easily do then why isn't it doing it ?
Of course USA will work with any one in Pakistan that furthers its own national interests, whether they are good for Pakistan or not. That is something Pakistan needs to sort out for itself.
That "understanding" is a coerced illegality. That is the problem that shackles Pakistan to remain where it is.
people like
Hamid Mir Najam Sathi and Kamran Shafi etc will be suffering from diarrhea right now
they religiously hate the Pak army
Yes, vut do you still want me to stand behind a person who is in voilation of Article 43?? He stood on the floor of the house and lied to the whole world --- and lied to me ---- so i think he lost the credibility --- i want someone new to represent me ---