What war has Pakistan won against India? You've lost every damn one don't go around here with your superiority complex when you have none.
1. Stalemate is not winning
2. US lost due to asymmetric warfare prevailing over their inferior conventional tactics, and they didn't occupy sh1t if there was still an ongoing conflict with North Vietnam.
3. US did fvck all against ISIS except join at the last minute like they always do, that victory belonged to Soleimani and the forces led by him. Iraq is now aligned with Iran, and it looks like the US doesn't have a future in the country anymore. So much for winning. ISIS is ultimately a creature of the Zio-American establishment, they were just cleaning house so they deserve no credit.
4. Taliban still exists, the US has resorted to negotiations because of their failure against homegrown insurgencies. The negotiations are not up to the US and they will stay there forever if they don't accept reality and go home.
I've had enough with you, it's very clear where you allegiances lie and it's certainly not Islam and the wellbeing of your fellow muslims. You're clearly rooting for the US, not just in the conflict brewing now over in Iran. But in general. At least the previous clowns I destroyed in these recent threads had some red lines and standards.
Pakistan versus India
Pakistan is up against a relatively much larger foe in India - 2nd most populous country in the world. Nevertheless, Pakistani armed forces have done well in clashes with Indian armed forces in any conflict.
India managed to splinter Pakistan in 1971 but this was due to geographical factors as well as Pakistani internal political crisis.
But Pakistan in its current form is a very hard nut to crack and India is not up to the task at present. Pakistan managed to become a nuclear power in response to Indian nuclear ambitions, is also an achievement in itself.
Others
1. VICTORY in a conflict is determined on the basis of fulfillment of relevant military and/or political objectives.
PRIMARY (military and/or political) objective of USA in the Korean War was to liberate South Korea from North Korea. US-led forces accomplished this objective = VICTORY.
Taking over North Korea was not originally planned but proposed and agreed upon at a later stage = SECONDARY (military and/or political) objective of USA in the Korean War. This objective could not be fulfilled because China intervened at this stage and dispatched its army to help North Korea. USA was now risking a conflict of much bigger scale and scope accordingly. Therefore, this objective was
dropped and US-led forces retreated back to South Korea.
Clear enough to you now?
2. Excuse me? US-led forces invaded and occupied entire Vietnam. However, opposing forces (i.e. VIETCONG) had a strong footprint in neighboring states such as Cambodia, Laos, and even China.
Anyways, contrary to popular belief, VIETCONG was a powerful military force with expertise in irregular forms of warfare as well as conventional warfare (e.g. Tet offensive); very well-equipped to exchange blows with US-led forces on an equal footing with the very best of Soviet and Chinese equipment at the time.
VIETCONG had fought the Japanese and the French before, and successfully routed the French.
Americans were unable to pull off massive armored thrusts in Vietnam due to its geographical features and vast forrested environments
blunted impact of bombing runs on enemy positions at times - WW2 style warfare methods were not up to the task here. Even though American troops were
victorious in the Tet offensive phase of the Vietnam War, American citizens in the mainland were no longer supporting this war effort and exerted pressure on the Johnson Administration to withdraw American troops from Vietnam.
In summary:-
"North Vietnam had suffered a military defeat but had won a political and diplomatic victory by shifting American policy toward disengagement."
3. Excuse me again? ISIS was a vast movement spanning across Syria and Iraq and Iranian militias could not handle it by themselves.
Read and learn:
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/timeline-the-rise-spread-and-fall-the-islamic-state
ISIS stronghold in Syria (i.e. Raqqa) fell to US-led forces and ISIS stronghold in Iraq (i.e. Mosul) also fell to US-led forces - both in 2017. In fact, last known bastion of ISIS (i.e. Dier ez-Zor) also fell to US-led forces in 2019.
ISIS movement was an unintended byproduct of both American and Iranian interventions in Iraq. Both USA and Iran share blame in this, and both had to clean up this mess ironically.
4. US-led forces thrashed/routed the original Afghan Taliban back in 2002.
Afghan Taliban eventually
resurged because US shifted its attention to the Middle East and failed to reform Afghanistan through the years. Americans are no longer interested in subjecting Afghanistan to another major military operation because Afghanistan is a landlocked state and Pakistan has convinced US to consider a negotiated settlement for Afghanistan on top.
My allegiance
I am all for Islamic brotherhood and a complete revisit to Islamic practices in current times
but what can I do about Sunni versus Shia dynamic? What can I do about Iran poking its nose in affairs of other countries? What can I do about the inherent belief system of Iranian Mullah regime in regards to taking over the Middle East and seeking confrontation with Israel?
Now that Iran seems to be on the receiving end of its political blunders, what kind of responses you expect from those individuals/entities who attempted to reason with Iranian and warned them about the necessity to change their ways?
You must ask why Iran under Shah regime was among the most liked of states in the world and why Iran under Shiite Mullahs is among the most disliked of states in existence.
Substantial food for thought for you above. Best wishes.
