And? Starlink is about communications. What the U.S. military wants whether communication or remote sensing is their thing with NSA or NRO or whatever branch.
lol, he doesn't even know what Network Centric Warfare is and what is Information Warfare. Do you think he knows what Satellite Tracking and Comm module is for?
For Satellite tracking, there are 4 variable matrices for any ISTAR operator, they are
"Predictable"
"Unpredictable"
"Trackable"
"Untraceable"
A target is ASSUMED to be unpredictable if it is on the move, which mean unless you know where your target is going, and to which route they are taking to the target. You won't know which direction of travel of your target until he made the move, which make tracking such target in real time nearly impossible.
For example, can you guess what the F-22 would do from one action to the next one??
A very good exercise we always do is to put your mouse cursor to your target and predict where they are going to go. Which usually ends up your cursor losing the target, that's real time tracking.
A stationary ground target is predictable. Until the moment it start to move, because you know it's always going to be there until it moves. When it move, it will become either trackable or untraceable.
The Matrix of Trackable and Untraceable is basically different parameter of whether or not you can put your effort to "Put a Pin on it" If it is too fast, too violent, and too far for example, that target is untrackable.
On the other hand, the sole purpose for Satellite Communication is to make sure you have a point-to-point comm ready to go, it will not be interfered as long as you held both end at the same track.