Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
5 Indian troops might have been very close to Pakistan side, which Pakistani troops might have considered as some kind of a potential threat or incursion. Hence the firing.
Its funny how Indians by default think that their army doesn't violate the ceasefire. 2 of them were injured by an IED.
RIP
Can we talk of this incident? And how come getting injured of an IED blast within own boundaries is ceasefire violation? And that too an engineer core jawan.
Sometimes stupidity defies logic.
Close to pakistani side means what?
If they were within Indian side of fence, they had the right to live.
NOt same old story..This is what happened:same old story that Pakistani forces fired first and innocent Indians were taking tea in their bunkers ...who knows the reality..anyhow RIP to the soldier, may God give patience to his family...
That is a different sector-Akhnoor.Anyways TOI says Indian soldier was killed in IED blast and not Pak firing.
The deceased soldier was killed in a fire exchange.
You need to tell your soldiers to stop messing with us other wise they will have the same fate that this soldier hadI hate these RIP comments.
How can a person's soul rest in piece if his killer are roaming free ?
I would say give a fitting reply that would send chills down enemy's the spine.
Life of Indian soldiers are not so cheap.
There is always a threat when you are too close to the fence or LOC. Applies to both Pakistanis and Indians.
Anyways TOI says Indian soldier was killed in IED blast and not Pak firing.
When a team of the Army jawans went to the forward area to rescue their injured colleague and shift him to hospital, Pakistan Army personnel opened fire on them causing injuries to three more jawans. One of them, from the 2 Maratha Light Infantry unit, later succumbed to his injuries
international border in Jammu and Kashmir Sunday, an official said Monday.