Levina
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2013
- Messages
- 15,278
- Reaction score
- 59
- Country
- Location
I recognise kashmir and nothing else.Remember two terms Indian Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (IoJ&K) and Azad (free) Kashmir.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I recognise kashmir and nothing else.Remember two terms Indian Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (IoJ&K) and Azad (free) Kashmir.
ReallyI recognise kashmir and nothing else.
pm wouldve hailed anyone who ad fought for liberation of Kashmir frm India Burhan was no exception and btw i was talking about Burhan training his peers in forests of IslamabadBurhan was a recruiter, as Hizb commander. The Pak PM hailed him and Hizb ul Mujaheedin proudly in the UN, even when the Organization is a banned UN designated terrorist organization.
As per his own admission, Hizb forces were trained with Pak help. Though he himself must have panicked. Could fire only two rounds before being killed.
Those are Planet Pakistan terms.Remember two terms Indian Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (IoJ&K) and Azad (free) Kashmir.
Are attacks on legitimate military targets considered terror attacks now? Militaries are built for the purpose of fighting and defending. It's not like unarmed, incapable and defenseless civilians were targeted.It will be hard for India to tackle 'peaceful protests', but terror attacks are easy to tackle. In today's world no one will tolerate violence. Whatever gains these guys achieved in last 85 days has been lost.
Are attacks on legitimate military targets considered terror attacks now? Militaries are built for the purpose of fighting and defending. It's not like unarmed, incapable and defenseless civilians were targeted.
Your military targets Kashmiri freedom fighters all the time and you call them military operations, praise the soldiers for their bravery but when the Kashmiris hit back the military you label them cowardly terror attacks. What kind of unethical standards do you guys subscribe to?
You didn't answer the question. Is fighting against an armed, able to fight and able to defend person terrorism?And who give them guns? Who gives them grenades? The answer is obvious. It is clear that they are not Kashmiris, but from across the border.
You didn't answer the question. Is fighting against an armed, able to fight and able to defend person terrorism?
I won't call it terrorism. If they're fighting against military.It is terrorism. Do you accept if your soldiers are killed by Baluch separatists?
I won't call it terrorism. If they're fighting against military.
Tell me which elsewhere recognize your surgical strike in and usa officialy denied your claimsMay be that is the view in Pakistan, but not in India or elsewhere in the world. And Pakistan cannot blackmail India to tables on Kashmir by violence. Nothing in the world has been solved by violence, and never will be.
Than why you run away all the time from talksMay be that is the view in Pakistan, but not in India or elsewhere in the world. And Pakistan cannot blackmail India to tables on Kashmir by violence. Nothing in the world has been solved by violence, and never will be.
May be that is the view in Pakistan, but not in India or elsewhere in the world. And Pakistan cannot blackmail India to tables on Kashmir by violence. Nothing in the world has been solved by violence, and never will be.
Do you need a skirt!!??? It certainly looks like you need one since you're not man enough to come and attack but then you hide behind the terrorists
The funny thing was after two rats were put down by jawans the rest two cowards ran away and jumped in the river to escape...
When terrorists in pakistan attacjed the military points in the early times why did you call them a terrorits
????
We'll kniw your double standard