What's new

BREAKING! Kandahar has been captured!

I explain to you why they chose to withdraw.. There is no stragetic signficiance for them in Afghanistan

I don't think so, read below...complete article link is here:

1628815939303.png
 
.
Taliban will never build a nation, they dont know how and never will, but thatsallgudman cuz all we need is the army of the black flags,
the power of Taliban will encourage muslims across the world hopefully to challenge the New World Order that is enslaving us through the lie that is the banking system,
once the pieces are in place, the $$ AKA toilet paper money will collapse and we are free,
this is for me truly a dream about destroying the global banking System through a global muslim revolt led spiritually by the Taliban but the troops will be all 3 billion muslims,
just imagine a world free of the banking terror,
not even the hardcore anti muslim would go against it ,
and the only power challenging these evil globalists is islam and Taliban
 
. .
Its just an opinion piece —
Realty is just different and much more fluid they can keep an eye on it next 20+ years and ground realty will not change.
I have other references from Brookings Institute as well as other which I do not want to link here which also indicates that the strategy is remote assistance plus intelligence based special ops ... the notion which so many on this thread have that US will eventually completely leave this Country or more broadly the region is false... you do know that there is a critical mass in US who also think that Pakistani nukes are not safe given if Pakistan somehow (Allah SWT na karey) went into chaos or become instable so yes on paper it seems US is wrapping up but it isn't or have liberty of completely closing its engagement...
 
.
AP is really the one that matters - it really is a mirror of history with the NVA heading to Saigon.
The only difference is that Vietnam had no logical real reason where here the US should have left right after OP Anaconda and used its well placed intel to get OBL instead of the lives and money spent in a region and people who want nothing to do with the west except for green cards.
I have other references from Brookings Institute as well as other which I do not want to link here which also indicates that the strategy is remote assistance plus intelligence based special ops ... the notion which so many on this thread have that US will eventually completely leave this Country of more broadly the region is false... you do know that there is a critical mass in US who also think that Pakistani nukes are not safe given if Pakistan somehow (Allah SWT na karey) went into chaos or instability so yes on paper it seems US is wrapping up but it isn't or have liberty of completely closing its engagement...
A lot of it is being perpetuated by NRIs or their lobbyist associates.US military vets and current members for the most part don’t express than but these funded think tanks and lobbyists are pushing that narrative vociferously. Khadim Rizvi types don’t help either.
 
.
A lot of it is being perpetuated by NRIs or their lobbyist associates.US military vets and current members for the most part don’t express than but these funded think tanks and lobbyists are pushing that narrative vociferously. Khadim Rizvi types don’t help either.

Sir, unfortunately these "special interests" groups or think tanks have a very influential (deep pockets) presence in the corridors of policy making and that what makes the difference and sadly vets have not much say or weightage in final decision making equation ...
 
.
Sir, unfortunately these "special interests" groups or think tanks have a very influential (deep pockets) presence in the corridors of policy making and that what makes the difference and sadly vets have not much say or weightage in final decision making equation ...
And that is how the United States in general works as a system. Want something done, either have a very very strong domestic voter backing or pay money.
 
. .
I don't think so, read below...complete article link is here:

This is hilarious stuff from so-called think tank and the text it self was so vague as it can be.. Who are these people are they gonna land from the sky.. He clearly says no US troops.. Who are these said people than? They don't emerge from thin air.. Pakistan will settle inside Afghanistan post-war and create depth the US ain't coming this way I guaraante you that and there is no way to militarily counter Taliban if you ain't putting heavy puts on the ground around 300k and anything else is not feasible... The focus is solely to focus on their main theater which is in East-Europe at the event of a major world conflict break out that is their main stragetic theater and to try to conquer the world from there inch by inch to create another US hegemony which demends on them actully winning the war and whoever wins the war will shape the world in his image this is what they truly are focussed on and they realize they could lose such war if Russia, China gathers other alliances.. No aid is coming to anyone in Asia or ocenia not Taiwan, South Korea, Japan or Australia
 
Last edited:
.
AP is really the one that matters - it really is a mirror of history with the NVA heading to Saigon.
The only difference is that Vietnam had no logical real reason where here the US should have left right after OP Anaconda and used its well placed intel to get OBL instead of the lives and money spent in a region and people who want nothing to do with the west except for green cards.

A lot of it is being perpetuated by NRIs or their lobbyist associates.US military vets and current members for the most part don’t express than but these funded think tanks and lobbyists are pushing that narrative vociferously. Khadim Rizvi types don’t help either.
U.S. contingency plan for Pakistani nukes - UPI.com

I don't think what you are saying is entirely correct.
 
.
This is hilarious stuff from so-called think tank and the text it self was so vague as it can be.. Who are these people are they gonna land from the sky.. He clearly says no US troops.. Who are these said people than? They don't emerge from thin air.. Pakistan will settle inside Afghanistan post-war and create depth the US ain't coming this way.. I guaraante you that. The focus is solely to focus on their main theater which is in East-Europe at the event of a major world conflict break out that is their main stragetic and to try to conquer the world from the inch by inch.. No aid is coming to anyone in Asia or ocenia not Taiwan, South Korea, Japan or Australia
Well your argument was Afghanistan have lost strategic significance (troops or no troops) for US and it seems you were wrong... the other stuff you so painstakingly wrote have no significance...
 
. .
we all remember what the late Emir Mullah Omar said :
"Bush has promised us defeat but Allah swt has promised us victory, I guess we will see whos promise will be fulfilled "
Bush right now must feel like the biggest idiot in the world , causing his country trillions just to hand over the country back to Mullah Omar predessessor in less then what ? 2 months ?
what a joke !!
and what a victory to islam
 
.
Well your argument was Afghanistan have lost strategic significance (troops or no troops) for US and it seems you were wrong... the other stuff you so painstakingly wrote have no significance...

As long as it is not stagging anything against it has completely lost significiance to them and this has something to do with where the world is heading right now. We are sort of in a peroid of technological explosion is happening and their claim to superpower has been chellenged by several state actors this is competition period and will keep escalating... What makes you think they would put an irrelevant place like Afghanistan over there future lives and a place that doesn't even threatens them logistically as their first pririoty.. There is a much bigger greater game going on and taliban is completely harmless to them and insignificiant for them right now hence why they just left in that manner because they have other priorities
 
Last edited:
.
U.S. contingency plan for Pakistani nukes - UPI.com

I don't think what you are saying is entirely correct.

The US always has a contingency plan for critical issues, including within itself. The FBI has been capturing a lot of domestic terrorists and it's been in the news. So the point is, as the only true superpower in the globe, the US would ensure safety in case, for everyone, including itself and internal security is not taken lightly either as I've given an example.

But a contingency plan should not be accounted for open hostility or the other side becoming an enemy. Plus UPI is a paid source and very questionable.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom