Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have other references from Brookings Institute as well as other which I do not want to link here which also indicates that the strategy is remote assistance plus intelligence based special ops ... the notion which so many on this thread have that US will eventually completely leave this Country or more broadly the region is false... you do know that there is a critical mass in US who also think that Pakistani nukes are not safe given if Pakistan somehow (Allah SWT na karey) went into chaos or become instable so yes on paper it seems US is wrapping up but it isn't or have liberty of completely closing its engagement...Its just an opinion piece —
Realty is just different and much more fluid they can keep an eye on it next 20+ years and ground realty will not change.
AP is really the one that matters - it really is a mirror of history with the NVA heading to Saigon.
A lot of it is being perpetuated by NRIs or their lobbyist associates.US military vets and current members for the most part don’t express than but these funded think tanks and lobbyists are pushing that narrative vociferously. Khadim Rizvi types don’t help either.I have other references from Brookings Institute as well as other which I do not want to link here which also indicates that the strategy is remote assistance plus intelligence based special ops ... the notion which so many on this thread have that US will eventually completely leave this Country of more broadly the region is false... you do know that there is a critical mass in US who also think that Pakistani nukes are not safe given if Pakistan somehow (Allah SWT na karey) went into chaos or instability so yes on paper it seems US is wrapping up but it isn't or have liberty of completely closing its engagement...
A lot of it is being perpetuated by NRIs or their lobbyist associates.US military vets and current members for the most part don’t express than but these funded think tanks and lobbyists are pushing that narrative vociferously. Khadim Rizvi types don’t help either.
And that is how the United States in general works as a system. Want something done, either have a very very strong domestic voter backing or pay money.Sir, unfortunately these "special interests" groups or think tanks have a very influential (deep pockets) presence in the corridors of policy making and that what makes the difference and sadly vets have not much say or weightage in final decision making equation ...
I concur.And that is how the United States in general works as a system. Want something done, either have a very very strong domestic voter backing or pay money.
I don't think so, read below...complete article link is here:
U.S. contingency plan for Pakistani nukes - UPI.comAP is really the one that matters - it really is a mirror of history with the NVA heading to Saigon.
The only difference is that Vietnam had no logical real reason where here the US should have left right after OP Anaconda and used its well placed intel to get OBL instead of the lives and money spent in a region and people who want nothing to do with the west except for green cards.
A lot of it is being perpetuated by NRIs or their lobbyist associates.US military vets and current members for the most part don’t express than but these funded think tanks and lobbyists are pushing that narrative vociferously. Khadim Rizvi types don’t help either.
Well your argument was Afghanistan have lost strategic significance (troops or no troops) for US and it seems you were wrong... the other stuff you so painstakingly wrote have no significance...This is hilarious stuff from so-called think tank and the text it self was so vague as it can be.. Who are these people are they gonna land from the sky.. He clearly says no US troops.. Who are these said people than? They don't emerge from thin air.. Pakistan will settle inside Afghanistan post-war and create depth the US ain't coming this way.. I guaraante you that. The focus is solely to focus on their main theater which is in East-Europe at the event of a major world conflict break out that is their main stragetic and to try to conquer the world from the inch by inch.. No aid is coming to anyone in Asia or ocenia not Taiwan, South Korea, Japan or Australia
This is not a source from which the Afghan Taliban could be blamed for a crime they did not commit. This wiki article needs additional citations for verification.
Well your argument was Afghanistan have lost strategic significance (troops or no troops) for US and it seems you were wrong... the other stuff you so painstakingly wrote have no significance...
U.S. contingency plan for Pakistani nukes - UPI.com
I don't think what you are saying is entirely correct.