What's new

Breaking: Israel already breaks 72 hour humanitarian ceasefire

-25 bodies pulled out of rubble under homes in central Gaza: Gaza Ministry of Health





Hamas said it would respond strongly if Israel breaks the cease fire. What happened? They kept launching ground offensives in southern Gaza.

The killed 5 Palestinian civilians and wounded 29. Also, 25 bodies were found killed execution style in homes in central Gaza. This is a massacre.

Hamas did not respond still, there are some rumors on media lately but they aren't true.

good if hamas dont respond for now as still wat to do Hospital and people on Palestine need medical food etc..

Praise to the Freedom fighter :)
 
.
Ground reports are saying Gaza residents were shelled earlier in the first breach of the cease fire in northern Gaza after walking in the streets thinking there was no fire. But, Israeli forces fired on them.

There were false reports of of clashes in Kerem Abu Salem.

What is true is there were clashes inside Rafah of Gaza in the south of Gaza. Israel is saying 'truce is over' and has it's own story.

Palestinians say Israeli forces tried advancing deeper into Rafah and clashed with Palestinian fighters resulted in IDF casualties. Then IDF armor near border were given orders to shell the areas inside Rafah.

And 10 Palestinians have now been killed, dozens injured.

There is another rumor which most likely isn't true and I will post updates if such a rumor has any truth to it.
 
.
Israel kills 3 despite ceasefire, after 16 killed in hours before | Maan News Agency

GAZA CITY (Ma'an) -- Three Palestinians were killed in the Gaza Strip by Israeli forces on Friday, only hours after a 72-hour ceasefire between Israel and Hamas came into effect.

Ahmad Muhammad Hasanein, was shot dead by Israeli soldiers in eastern Gaza City, while the bodies of Bassel Diab al-Bsyuni, 37, and an unidentified man were brought to Kamal Adwan hospital as a result of an Israeli strike.

A Ma'an correspondent in Gaza said that three were wounded after Israeli artillery fired several shells east of Rafah, in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire by Israeli forces about two hours in.

........................



No, two mortars fired at an military base ten minutes after the Israeli shelling. Haaretz had this in their live updates but they just edited it out.
So another story which cannot be proved...
When are you going to show sources of your unfounded allegations on other subjects.
 
. .
The main account in the media now is that Israeli forces tried advancing deeper into Rafah south of Gaza. They already had some control.

They got in a firefight with Palestinian fighters which resulted in heavy casualties for them. Of course, like always they began shelling the whole place.

Now health ministry is saying 'tens of Palestinians' have been killed in Rafah. Now Palestinian sources are saying 40 were killed in southern Gaza, hundreds injured after massive indiscriminate terrorism.

Some people are now saying more than 100 Palestinians killed. This is purely genocide at this moment.

There are unconfirmed reports of an Israeli soldier captured during the firefight.

Palestinians are saying there is no confirmation of such a thing. But, Israel is using that as an excuse to massively attack.
..............

So typical. Israel doesn't respect cease fire. Tries going on further limited offensive. Get their butt kicked. So they start taking out their anger on dozens of civilians murdering them.

Then they go cry to the UN and say the cease fire is over.
 
.
Cease-Fire to start at 8:00 A.M.
Palestinian Mortar fire reported to occur at 10:04.
Israeli fire reported to occur less that 3 hours after beginning of cease-fire.

Conclusion: Israeli fire occurs before 11:00. Haaretz claims 10:38.

=> No source showing Israeli shoots first.

Maan:
A Ma'an correspondent in Gaza said that three were wounded after Israeli artillery fired several shells east of Rafah, in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire by Israeli forces about two hours in.

This does not give any exact timing.
Also the selected wording only says when israelis started shooting.
If the purpose was to claim that Israelis were the first violators, you would write:

"in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire, which was done by Israeli forces about two hours"
This statement does not preclude that Palestinians fired first.


It is highly suspicious that both You and Ma'an uses phrases which changes meaning when
they are carefully analyzed.

You have yet to show source.

You also need to show source that Hamas is considered to be a legitimate resistance organisation worldwide.
 
.
BBC correspondent reports on first violation of cease fire:
..................

Palestinians are reporting officially confirmed 30 Palestinians have been killed, over 200 injured in Rafah of southern Gaza. Some put the number at 40. Some are saying much larger.

.....................

Some unconfirmed reports are saying 35 minutes before cease fire Hamas armed wing killed 15 Israeli soldiers in Keram Abu Salem but Israel admitted it four hours after cease fire, during the hour before the cease fire at least 16 Palestinian civilians have been killed in Israeli air strikes on their homes, 10 from the same family

..........

Too many unconfirmed reports right now....



......

What is confirmed is there is massive shelling/aerial bombardment in Rafah south of Gaza and at least 40 killed, over 200 injured

..............
Cease-Fire to start at 8:00 A.M.
Palestinian Mortar fire reported to occur at 10:04.
Israeli fire reported to occur less that 3 hours after beginning of cease-fire.

Israeli fire occurs before 11:00. Haaretz claims 10:38.

Maan:
A Ma'an correspondent in Gaza said that three were wounded after Israeli artillery fired several shells east of Rafah, in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire by Israeli forces about two hours in.

This does not give any exact timing.
Also the selected wording only says when israelis started shooting.
If the purpose was to claim that Israelis were the first violators, you would write:

"in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire, which was done by Israeli forces about two hours"
This statement does not preclude that Palestinians fired first.

It is highly suspicious that both You and Ma'an uses phrases which changes meaning when
they are carefully analyzed.

Again, different sources are saying different things. I was following Haaretz the whole time and no such update was there except when news of clashes inside Gaza occurred. When there are 40 killed, and over 200 injured obviously it wasn't over a small mortar that fell in the sand.

That means there was heavy ground fighting after Israeli forces tried advancing.

Here is Al Jazeera saying there was shelling:
Gaza Blog - Live Blogs - Al Jazeera English
But tank fire and shelling has continued early into Friday morning killing more Palestinians.

................

This is what Maan is saying:

Israel kills 4 despite ceasefire, after 16 killed in hours before | Maan News Agency

A Ma'an correspondent in Gaza said that three were wounded after Israeli artillery fired several shells east of Rafah, in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire by Israeli forces about two hours in.

............
 
.
Cease-Fire to start at 8:00 A.M.
Palestinian Mortar fire reported to occur at 10:04.
Israeli fire reported to occur less that 3 hours after beginning of cease-fire.

Conclusion: Israeli fire occurs before 11:00. Haaretz claims 10:38.

=> No source showing Israeli shoots first.

Maan:
A Ma'an correspondent in Gaza said that three were wounded after Israeli artillery fired several shells east of Rafah, in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire by Israeli forces about two hours in.

This does not give any exact timing.
Also the selected wording only says when israelis started shooting.
If the purpose was to claim that Israelis were the first violators, you would write:

"in what appears to have been the first violation of the ceasefire, which was done by Israeli forces about two hours"
This statement does not preclude that Palestinians fired first.


It is highly suspicious that both You and Ma'an uses phrases which changes meaning when
they are carefully analyzed.

You have yet to show source.

You also need to show source that Hamas is considered to be a legitimate resistance organisation worldwide.
There was a soldier kidnapping attempt in Rafah area under the cover of truce. 5 Hamas killed casualties from the Israeli side are not released yet.
 
.
There was a soldier kidnapping attempt in Rafah area under the cover of truce. 5 Hamas killed casualties from the Israeli side are not released yet.

Bullcrap, no there wasn't. Israel is making that up to justify breaking the cease fire and shedding blood of more Palestinians. Rafah 'area' implies it was inside Palestinian territory.
 
. .
Palestinians are now reporting 50 killed, over 300 injured in Israeli shelling in southern Gaza
 
.
Bullcrap, no there wasn't. Israel is making that up to justify breaking the cease fire and shedding blood of more Palestinians. Rafah 'area' implies it was inside Palestinian territory.
Its simple: who's interest? Israel needs currently time to destroy the tunnels. Hamas wants to hinder that and use that time to snipe and try to hijack soldiers.

But in same time Qatari funded Hamas terrorists are heavily criticized in Gaza, since they hide in bunkers and 5 star hotels and refuse to cease fire. Thats why they made a trick: agreed to cease fire and then broke it.
 
.
Its simple: who's interest? Israel needs currently time to destroy the tunnels. Hamas wants to hinder that and use that time to snipe and try to hijack soldiers.
.

No it isn't 'simple'. Israel has no interest in a cease fire. Since hundreds of bodies would be pulled from underground and it would get worldwide condemnation forcing it to end this offensive.

Of course, they knew that and began more ground offensives into Rafah. Made up a story about a captured soldier as well. No reports from the Palestinian side of any such thing.

Your rhetoric is meaningless.
 
.
More bogus from Israel. In Rafah, 2 hours before the cease fire clashes had been going on. Hamas killed 15 Israeli soldiers during this clash. Israel covered it up for hours.

Until 4 hours after the cease fire, they start making up a story of an 'captured soldier'. An Israeli soldier tells NBC they confirm a soldier was captured. That is bogus, Israeli military policy is not allowed to leak such things if they occurred. Especially minutes after this story came about.

Palestinians are not making any such claims.

After the civilians felt safe and began walking out to stock up food supplies the massive shelling began. Most likely there will be over 100 civilians killed and thousands injured.

They are making up more stories of massive clashes right now with heavy casualties on both sides. Another lie, the casualties occurred before. Right now there is only massive shelling with 50 Palestinian civilians killed in Israeli artillery shelling, and more bodies under destroyed homes.

This is either the most incompetent 'army' in the world or they are deliberately targeting civilians. We all hear how Israeli military professionalism is unmatched.

..............
 
.
No it isn't 'simple'. Israel has no interest in a cease fire. Since hundreds of bodies would be pulled from underground and it would get worldwide condemnation forcing it to end this offensive.

Of course, they knew that and began more ground offensives into Rafah. Made up a story about a captured soldier as well. No reports from the Palestinian side of any such thing.

Your rhetoric is meaningless.
Now its confirmed. At 9:30 when truce started Hamas force came out of tunnels and managed to hijack the soldier or his body in Rafah area.

In similar way they used truce before, but failed.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom