What's new

(Breaking) China moves to end Hong Kong's autonomy

. .
Many Hong Kongers are racist against Vietnamese and Southeast Asians in general. Don't kid yourself.
No problem. those money sacks will flee some of them will come to Vietnam. We accepted lots of chinese refugees in the past. If any of them are too racist, we can send them to Chinese style education camp.
 
.
End of the day, HK is Chinese territory and has been for hundreds if not thousands of years. These are the same Western countries who are screaming now who invaded China during the Opium wars and took away HK and other cities from China. I am surprised China did not do this earlier.
 
.
End of the day, HK is Chinese territory and has been for hundreds if not thousands of years. These are the same Western countries who are screaming now who invaded China during the Opium wars and took away HK and other cities from China. I am surprised China did not do this earlier.
I guess international laws means nothing to you?

Beside I'll be laughing all the way to bank seeing how the Chinese will no doubt effed up its Hong Kong's crisis.
 
.
I guess international laws means nothing to you?

Beside I'll be laughing all the way to bank seeing how the Chinese will no doubt effed up its Hong Kong's crisis.

What international law? China is ignoring US and UK in HK issue, that's all.
 
. . .
You do know those laws are about national security which fall in the category of defense affair.
Siting from the Wiki "The [HKSAR] will be directly under the authority of the Central People's Government of the [PRC and] will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs."
 
.
You do know those laws are about national security which fall in the category of defense affair.
Siting from the Wiki "The [HKSAR] will be directly under the authority of the Central People's Government of the [PRC and] will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs."
"Autonomy"
 
. .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-British_Joint_Declaration

I know that most of you guys don't have Google or have it's result heavily altered but please do some ****!ng research.

First, don't get too emotional :D boy.

Second, that's not international law but a bilateral declaration.

Third, you are the one that need to research more.
In 'one country two system' that Chinese and british signed in 1984, the "two systems" only function under the framework of "one country," the premise of which is National Security.

That's mean if Central Government see what happen in HK threatening National security, in order to maintain law and order in HK. They can bring National Law, the Central Government is merely exercising its legitimate rights over HK and ensuring the Stability of HK.


"High Autonomy" doesn't mean "Absolute Autonomy".

That dude really have IQ below standard :enjoy:

he trying to ignore 'one country' in "one country two system"
Cannot even differentiate High degree of Autonomy with Absolute otonomy :lol:

Typical lack of education in indonesia
 
.
I guess international laws means nothing to you?

Beside I'll be laughing all the way to bank seeing how the Chinese will no doubt effed up its Hong Kong's crisis.

Listen smart arse, it is their LAND, they can do anything they like there. You can take intentional law and shove it up where the sun doesn't shine. :lol:
 
.
"High Autonomy" doesn't mean "Absolute Autonomy".
Voting for your own leader & not interfering in local politics is considered basic autonomy. China doesn't even let Hong Kong have it.

Edit: hate to be a stickler but how do you differentiate high autonomy to absolute autonomy when autonomy means the right of self governance within a political system.
 
Last edited:
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom