Most certainly I don't acknowledge the Genocides , i do acknowledge some massacres to extent. Anyway, Genocide is a bit different term to massacre. It is the legal term ,where one side needs to prove ,the intention ,planning etc at the political and state level of the accused side. I believe Turkish government never denied the massacres. I believe that over 50 officials were executed for that. I also think that Venezelos awarded Musta Kemal for peace contribution.
You see, the challenge of Turkish government to Armenians and probably Greeks has always been to go to The Hague, and file the accusation. Both of you always declined. Holland, Denmark Sweden declined also in the early 20s. So ,unless you prove it 8n the Court of Low , most certainly, it is not Genocide. This thing will tell you any lawyer. You see , Bosnians went to the Hague and proved certain thing. I think Gambia filed the writ to Hague on behalf of Rohingiya and won.
What really you want here that whatever you say must be taken as the verdict. Exclusively only you. Believe me the opposite is true at least in the case of Armenians. That's the reason, they always refused to go to the court, to their archives ,no one has access. Moreover, I believe that Russians have a lot leverage against them for that matter. Because,even in USSR they kept bragging about their "achievement ". There are plenty testimonies of Dashnak ,Hunchak etc el members, foreign diplomats of planned and executed massacres, committed by the Armenians. Even some Russian officials were talking that Armenians were commiting the outrages in order that Ottomans react. Of course, the plan was that foreign powers intervne and give them " freedom ". These are the words also of British, French and other diplomats.
