What's new

Bloody terror of Bangladesh mutiny

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
Sad reading.

Wonder why its taking so long, even now the Supreme court is debating.. . Part of the article below reminds me of similar accounts of the mutiny of 1857.

BD still has not decided what to do with the ' war criminals ' of 71.

Retribution like justice has to be swift when dealing with those in uniform who commit offences like these
.


BBC NEWS | South Asia | Bloody terror of Bangladesh mutiny

Six months on, the BBC's Mark Dummett pieces together what happened during a border guard mutiny in Bangladesh and examines claims that suspects have been tortured and killed.

It was nine in the morning and, like teenagers everywhere, Nadeet was on his way to bed.

His sister was already at school, his father had said goodbye and gone to work, and his mother had just left for the gym.

Nadeet was tired after a night spent chatting to friends and tinkering with the old car he had recently bought with his father, the first the family had ever owned.

But he did not get much sleep that day.

Nadeet lived in Pilkhana, the British-era military camp in the heart of the Bangladeshi capital, Dhaka.

Its rose gardens, deer enclosure and sports fields are a world away from the mayhem of the overcrowded streets outside.

On that morning in February, soldiers of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) border security force were about to turn it into a killing zone.

By the time their revolt collapsed the following day, 74 people had lost their lives, and Bangladesh had been dragged to the brink of a nationwide armed conflict, as the mutiny spread to camps elsewhere.

The first Nadeet heard that something was wrong was when he was woken up by the family's housekeeper.

"Then all of a sudden there were more than 25 people firing at my house," Nadeet remembered.

"I could see the ceiling was falling off. I didn't know what to do, so I called up my friend, and I told him, listen bro' this could be the last time I'm talking to you, they're killing everyone in the BDR. So you must let the army know, and please be fast.

Nadeet hid under the bed until it was safe to come out
"Then I saw them break into my house. They were so ferocious. They were like, where are they, where are the kids, where are the wives?" Nadeet told the BBC World Service's Assignment programme.

He was one of the many eyewitnesses who helped piece together what happened during the course of the mutiny.

He described his escape and how he hid under a bed until it was finally safe to come out.

Only then did Nadeet discover what had happened to his father, Colonel Mojibul Haque, a senior officer.

He was shot and then thrown out of a second-floor window by his men, after he tried to restore order.

Fifty-six other officers were also gunned down or stabbed to death, as were the wife and two civilian house guests of the BDR's commander, Major-General Shakil Ahmed, as hundreds of soldiers went on the rampage.

The mutilated bodies were then dumped in mass graves, sewers and the camp's incinerator.

"Every day I ask myself why did such a brutal thing take place," Nadeet's mother Nehreen, who survived by hiding in the gym, said.

"My husband and the officers used to work so hard for these soldiers' benefit. My husband was a true soldier. He was such a loving and joyful character."

The question of what led to such brutality is one that has perplexed Bangladeshis ever since.

When the mutineers themselves telephoned the BBC's Bengali Service, they blamed their revolt on bad pay and years of mistreatment by corrupt officers.

The ferocity of the mutiny took many Bangladeshis by surprise
They eventually gave up after the government threatened to send tanks into Pilkhana, while also promising to look into their complaints.

But Bangladesh has a history of murky political conspiracies, so many people assumed that this too must have been part of a wider plot.

Faruq Khan, the minister in-charge of co-ordinating the investigation into the mutiny, told me he thought that a hard-core group of about 20 soldiers had exploited the grievances of the other men to destabilise the government, which had been elected only two months earlier.

It is a particularly understandable view given the family history of the new Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.

Thirty five years ago the army murdered her father, the country's first prime minister, along with most of his family, and Hasina has survived three assassination attempts since.

"I think this was planned," Faruk Khan said. "If you look at how large the matter was, that is proof that there was a planning."

The government straight away promised to uncover what was behind the revolt and administer justice as speedily as possible.

Six months later, the police are still working on their largest ever criminal case. There are about 5,000 suspects, and the FBI and Scotland Yard have lent a hand.

But their investigation has been overshadowed by claims that the unit conducting interrogations is torturing suspects, and may even have killed some of them.

The BDR itself admits that 40 of its men have died since February, but says seven committed suicide while the rest had heart attacks or died of other illnesses.

Searchers pulled bodies out of sewers around the barracks
Nur Khan Liton, of the Dhaka-based rights organisation Ain O Salish Kendra, said he had seen torture marks on the corpse of one BDR soldier, Mubarak, who according to official records, took his own life.

"I don't believe it, because I saw one dead body. I saw that a toenail of that BDR member had been pulled out," he said.

His claims echo those of the wife of another BDR soldier, who spoke to the BBC on condition of anonymity, because she had received phone calls threatening her with arrest if she spoke out publicly.

She described seeing her husband for the first time after his detention.

"I saw my husband seated on the floor. He could barely move because his whole body was bruised, and so were his eyes. At first I didn't recognise he was my husband.

"Then he shuffled nearer to me. He was crying. I was crying. I said 'where've you been'? He said, 'Don't ask me that. I'm alive. You've prayed for me. That's why I'm alive. But don't ask me where I've been'."

The police and the army deny the claims that prisoners are being abused, and the state prosecutor insisted that confessions had not been extracted by force.

"Torturing is not done in Bangladeshi prisons," Faruk Khan said. "The interrogators in this incident have been clearly instructed by the government that they must not go beyond the law."

Rights groups are also worried that the prisoners may not receive a fair trial.

Lawyers of some of the men say that they have been prevented from meeting their clients, in breach of the Bangladesh constitution.

The Supreme Court is currently debating whether or not the border guards should be tried under military law.

The fear is that the army's desire to punish the mutineers will outweigh all other considerations.

This may make it less, rather than more, likely that the full story of what happened ever emerges.
 
Last edited:
.

BD still has not decided what to do with the ' war criminals ' of 71.

Among the three worst war criminals (SK Mujib, Bhutto and Indhira), Indhira Ghandi was rated first in many Badeshi’s minds. Some of them would love to have her ashes back from Shashan, or you have saved some for them to beat the heck out of it?
 
.
[/COLOR]
Among the three worst war criminals (SK Mujib, Bhutto and Indhira), Indhira Ghandi was rated first in many Badeshi’s minds. Some of them would love to have her ashes back from Shashan, or you have saved some for them to beat the heck out of it?

Come back to us after you exhume the bodies of Mujib & Bhutto...

..and , you may like to grow up.
 
.
Sad reading.

Wonder why its taking so long, even now the Supreme court is debating.. . Part of the article below reminds me of similar accounts of the mutiny of 1857.

BD still has not decided what to do with the ' war criminals ' of 71.

Retribution like justice has to swift when dealing with those in uniform who commit offences like these
.

In which part of this article bears the similarity of 1857 mutiny?
Government sent the issue to the supreme court for a reference. They can't just hang those 1800 people right away without looking into the existing laws.

One thing for sure, they will be hanged, yet we want to do that under the most relevant law under which offence took place.
 
Last edited:
.
BD still has not decided what to do with the ' war criminals ' of 71.

The article you posted is well researched and completely appropriate,

But I fail to understand the need to put forward the 71 war reference here.

I would say that though, all who commit atrocities, against humanity are worthy of our hate and anger, whether Pakistani or Indian or Bangladeshi, or any other. I am not condoning their actions but

to state the 71 link here just fuels enmity between Pakistanis and their Bangladeshi brothers.

I feel, that all Pakistanis, whether Pushtoon(Afghan), Punjabi, Sindhi and Baloch feel really miserable and sad for what happened in 71 and was committed against our Bengali Brethren, and I know from some of our Bengali Brothers here, they still have love and a feeling of fraternity for us. So in that spirit, I dont have respect for this reference. I hope you understand.

:smitten::pakistan::smitten:
 
.
lajdani & RF,

At the outset the aim of posting the article was / is not to decry any actions by the BD Govt or any other for the matter.


In which part of this article bears the similarity of 1857 mutiny?
Government sent the issue to the supreme court for a reference. They can't just hang those 1800 people right away without looking into the existing laws.

One thing for sure, they will be hanged, yet we want to do that under the most relevant law under which offence took place.


The brutal manner in which innocent families were attacked & killed for no fault or their draws parallels with 1857. The way residences of Officers were attacked , the way it rapidly spread..all these seem similar.

As regards the law to persecute the offenders. It is for the Govt /ppl of BD to decide but here is a situation that almost brought the nation to a halt & undid years of hard work. How long is long enough ?

Justice delayed is justice denied, and the longer it takes the more pressure there will be . I feel the sooner the better of course within the ambit of the law of the land.


The article you posted is well researched and completely appropriate,

But I fail to understand the need to put forward the 71 war reference here.

I would say that though, all who commit atrocities, against humanity are worthy of our hate and anger, whether Pakistani or Indian or Bangladeshi, or any other. I am not condoning their actions but

to state the 71 link here just fuels enmity between Pakistanis and their Bangladeshi brothers.

I feel, that all Pakistanis, whether Pushtoon(Afghan), Punjabi, Sindhi and Baloch feel really miserable and sad for what happened in 71 and was committed against our Bengali Brethren, and I know from some of our Bengali Brothers here, they still have love and a feeling of fraternity for us. So in that spirit, I dont have respect for this reference. I hope you understand


Hey, no offence meant. What was intended was to draw attention to the fact that indecisiveness on part of Govts leads to erosion of faith in them. One has read so many stories on what this or that Govt in Dhaka wants / would do on the war criminals - its been 37 yrs now. One wonders if it is Pol wand to wave when mileage can be drawn or is the Govt serious.

Maybe this mutiny also goes the same way.
 
.
lajdani & RF,

At the outset the aim of posting the article was / is not to decry any actions by the BD Govt or any other for the matter.


In which part of this article bears the similarity of 1857 mutiny?
Government sent the issue to the supreme court for a reference. They can't just hang those 1800 people right away without looking into the existing laws.

One thing for sure, they will be hanged, yet we want to do that under the most relevant law under which offence took place.


The brutal manner in which innocent families were attacked & killed for no fault or their draws parallels with 1857. The way residences of Officers were attacked , the way it rapidly spread..all these seem similar.

As regards the law to persecute the offenders. It is for the Govt /ppl of BD to decide but here is a situation that almost brought the nation to a halt & undid years of hard work. How long is long enough ?

Justice delayed is justice denied, and the longer it takes the more pressure there will be . I feel the sooner the better of course within the ambit of the law of the land.


The article you posted is well researched and completely appropriate,

But I fail to understand the need to put forward the 71 war reference here.

I would say that though, all who commit atrocities, against humanity are worthy of our hate and anger, whether Pakistani or Indian or Bangladeshi, or any other. I am not condoning their actions but

to state the 71 link here just fuels enmity between Pakistanis and their Bangladeshi brothers.

I feel, that all Pakistanis, whether Pushtoon(Afghan), Punjabi, Sindhi and Baloch feel really miserable and sad for what happened in 71 and was committed against our Bengali Brethren, and I know from some of our Bengali Brothers here, they still have love and a feeling of fraternity for us. So in that spirit, I dont have respect for this reference. I hope you understand


Hey, no offence meant. What was intended was to draw attention to the fact that indecisiveness on part of Govts leads to erosion of faith in them. One has read so many stories on what this or that Govt in Dhaka wants / would do on the war criminals - its been 37 yrs now. One wonders if it is Pol wand to wave when mileage can be drawn or is the Govt serious.

Maybe this mutiny also goes the same way.

I second yu on most of your post except that of the reference o 1857 mutinee. Thats the only act in 200 years of British rule when Indians united against and challeged the british establishment. That is the only honor India had. So before comparing that to some idiot BDR soldiers you are not only disrespect yourself but you are disrespecting those soldiers who were hanged for the mutiny who we call them Shahid.
 
.
I second yu on most of your post except that of the reference o 1857 mutinee. Thats the only act in 200 years of British rule when Indians united against and challeged the british establishment. That is the only honor India had. So before comparing that to some idiot BDR soldiers you are not only disrespect yourself but you are disrespecting those soldiers who were hanged for the mutiny who we call them Shahid.
But, you forgot the Indians of today disown the 1857 war of liberation. They are taught that it was just a mutiny that was crushed by their British masters. Even in those days the Calcutta Babus were fully against that war. Please refer to the Babu literature of those days, specially of Babu Bankim Chandra Chatterjy.

Bengal was already divided into two in those days. One group wished their masters to win and stay forever, and the other group wished to oust the British. It is no wonder that the Muslims of India wanted a separate country of their own.
 
Last edited:
. .
Haha, east watch, I must congratulate you on your brilliant grip of history.

Is that the sort of stupid propoganda that they feed you across the border, or is it something that you picked up at some third rate blog site?
 
.
But, you forgot the Indians of today disown the 1857 war of liberation. They are taught that it was just a mutiny that was crushed by their British masters. Even in those days the Calcutta Babus were fully against that war. Please refer to the Babu literature of those days, specially of Babu Bankim Chandra Chatterjy.

Bengal was already divided into two in those days. One group wished their masters to win and stay forever, and the other group wished to oust the reds. It is no wonder that the Muslims of India wanted a separate country of their own.

correct urself. not all muslims of India only few.
 
.
SC against military trial of mutiny: source :: :: bdnews24.com ::

SC against military trial of mutiny: source
Thu, Sep 10th, 2009 3:56 pm BdST

Dhaka, Sept 10 (bdnews24.com)--The Supreme Court has unanimously opined against a military trial of BDR mutineers, a highly placed source hinted to bdnews24.com although the opinion has been kept under wraps.

The opinion of the 11-member full bench of Appellate Division, headed by chief justice M M Ruhul Amin on the reference seeking directives on the trial process, was sent to president Zillur Rahman on Thursday.

The source, who asked to remain unnamed, said two of the judges made additional observations, but he would not divulge what those are.

Earlier, Supreme Court registrar Shawkat Hossain told bdnews24.com that he handed the file containing the opinion to the president at around 12:45pm.

Asked about the apex court's opinion, Hossain said: "The file was sealed. I cannot say anything about the content."

State minister for law Kamrul Islam told reporters at the Secretariat on Thursday: "Whatever opinion the Supreme Court has given, it will have to be respected."

"No-one should question this opinion."

The president sent the reference to the court on Aug 17 seeking directives on the trial process, specifically whether the mutineers could be tried under the Army Act 1952.

The court appointed 10 senior lawyers as amici curiae, advisers to the court', to advise on the reference.

It began hearing on the reference on Aug 25 and ended it on Sept 3.

The majority of the amici curiae observed that the BDR mutiny trial could not be held under the Army Act.

An inter-ministerial meeting on the BDR trial decided month to seek the chief justice's opinion as views varied widely on whether the mutineers should be tried under BDR, army or civil laws.

At least 73 people, including 57 army officers deputed to the paramilitary force, were killed in the bloody Feb 25-26 mutiny at the Peelkhana headquarters in Dhaka.

Attorney general Mahbubey Alam, presenting the reference before the court on Aug 25, said the mutiny case filed in Dhaka saw 1, 779 people arrested so far.

Another 40 cases filed in connection with BDR rebellions outside Dhaka saw 1, 721 persons arrested.

A total 3,500 people are facing trial in the cases, said Alam.

Majority against court martial

Only two of the amici curiae spoke in favour of trial by Army Act at the six-day hearing.

Six others either were against army trial or against answering the reference as it may interfere with ongoing investigations.

Dr Kamal Hossain said that the defendants would have to be classified based on their offences through investigation. "We want punishment for the criminals. But we do not want innocent BDR personnel punished," he said.

Written submissions on the presidential reference were then presented on behalf of Mahmudul Islam and Ajmalul Hossain, who were abroad.

Mahmudul's statement said trial of BDR members is not possible under the Army Act, and last February's incident could not be tried by notification with retrospective effect.

Ajmalul Hossain also said the provisions of the Army Act were not applicable for BDR members, nor could a notification have retrospective effect.

Kamal Hossain had said the same the day before, as had Barrister Amir-Ul Islam.

Barrister Rokanuddin Mahmud was not in favour of the reference itself. He said 57 army officers were killed in the BDR mutiny, more than were killed in the 1971 independence war and, therefore, the trial should be "exemplary".

But, Mahmud said, the mutiny case was filed under the criminal code. He said investigation was ongoing, with charges yet to be pressed and if the court gave answer to the president's reference it could "tie the hands of investigators".

Mentioning different examples in India and Pakistan's Supreme Court, he said the reference could be sent back.

Earlier, advocate T H Khan had also spoken against trial under the Army Act, and against the reference itself, while barrister Rafique-Ul Huq and advocate Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed said the border guards could be tried under military law by issuing notification under the Army Act, Section 5.

Mahbubuddin also said there may be some question about the notification's retroactive effect.
 
.
Among the three worst war criminals (SK Mujib, Bhutto and Indhira), Indhira Ghandi was rated first in many Badeshi’s minds. Some of them would love to have her ashes back from Shashan, or you have saved some for them to beat the heck out of it?

Please, excuse my ignorence what was the role of Mujib and Indira
that make them criminal. Mujib role after independent is very debatable and controversial but why MRS. Ghandi was a criminal ? Just because she was indian PM at that time ? Personally I might not like her for some reason or other but I do salaute her for her role in 1971.
 
.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The best role played in 1971 are by Gulam Azam, Abbas, Nizami, Yahiya, Tikka, and other Rajakars.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom