What's new

Blacks Climing Indus Valley Civilization

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whether your paper Dinosaurs make sense or not....its none of my business.
.
.
I urge every Indian to visit our land with Loaded pockets and go back empty :sick:
.
Same i demand from Chinese Buddhist Junta to visit TAXILA...once in a lifetime
You are just a baniya in disguise. :mad: Or a Pushtoon baniya. :devil:
 
Whether your paper Dinosaurs make sense or not....its none of my business.
.
.
I urge every Indian to visit our land with Loaded pockets and go back empty :sick:
.
Same i demand from Chinese Buddhist Junta to visit TAXILA...once in a lifetime
Sure why not i will request ch nisar to allow him entrance into sharda :D

Hope Bhagwan sabko theek rakhe.
Actually it was 6.2 and thankyou

You are just a baniya in disguise. :mad: Or a Pushtoon baniya. :devil:
Sheikh sahab hoosla
 
The energies which Indians spent to somehow attach themselves with IVC (while only minority have genuine linkage), Had they spent 1/2 of energy in digging south they would have found their forefathers.
 
The energies which Indians spent to somehow attach themselves with IVC (while only minority have genuine linkage), Had they spent 1/2 of energy in digging south they would have found their forefathers.

They don't want to do archaelogical excavation in Central and Southern India since they are fearful that they will find their real archaelogical roots in those regions. They are consequently fixated on Pakistan's archaelogical roots.
 
First of all we are talking of period 2500 B.C. to 1500 B.C. here. At that time there are only three civilizations in the world at that time. Sumerian, Egyptian and Indus Valley. Not all human settlements qualify for the status civilization. Please read on primary and secondary attributes of a civilization in historical/ archaeological context. Please limit your discussion to the period we are referring to. As to Hindu scriptures of which Rigveda is the oldest, none of them are dated as far as IVC. Rigveda appeared in around 500 B.C. Some 1000 years after decline of IVC. There is neither an old surviving script of Rigveda nor it is a scientific reference. Rigveda is composed of narratives of Rishis (persons who heard and forwarded the narrative) as is believed by followers of Hindu faith. As a scripture of faith to some, it is fine to believe in it. Each individual is free to believe and practice its religion. However presenting a scripture as a scientific evidence can not be accepted. For that you need hard science like archeology, genetics, geographical history and linguistic science. Please keep in mind that River Indus has never been in history a sacred river nor the area which is Indus basin remained with area east of it as one unit. In the last 5000 years, it has been only 300 years when area which now is Pakistan remained United with what now is India under an indigenous ruling dynasty. That is Maurian empire. Parts of India and Pakistan have been for some duration but neither for long and nor for entirety.

It is pertinent to note that Hindu faith had never claimed it's roots in Indus basin till 1920s when first IVC site was discovered by British. There is good strong evidence of that. No ancient temples in Pakistan. No sacred rituals associated with this area and no evidence of ancient Hindu history here. It was, until 1920s believed that Ganges basin and area south of its western half was birthplace of Hindu faith. Himalayas in the north mostly associated with meditation practices of Hindu mythology. It was also believed that Hindu faith is the oldest in the region and everyone was happy with this fact. No mention of Indus or this area. British were happy too as they found European (aryan) connection. Shock came after Railway engineers found Harrappa ruins and immediately the effort to somehow connect it to Hindu faith started. Just by any means possible. Some people just could not swallow that there existed a great civilization before Hindu faith. So please, I request you to take the history as it is and do not feel ashamed of what you have or where your roots are.

Rig Veda disagrees with you. :D

Rigveda is not a scientific evidence.

We are mainly Dalit converts with Arab blood, IVC people were high caste so how can we be the descendants

Please base your arguments on scientific basis. Here is genetic map of this area. As you can see people of Pakistan are genetically distinct from Indian diaspora. Such diversity can not come within 60 years. And we are no way genetically close to Dalits. Closest anyone come to us is Kashmiris Pundits, UP brahmins and Gujaratais to an extent. As a matter of fact Indian genetics are no where close to each other as a nation. If India is one nation in genetics term, we, the Pakistanis are part of Europeans in terms of genetics! Look for yourself

india-metspalu2011-figS12.png


Rig Veda talks about sapt Sindhu :-)

A river is a geographical feature. Rigveda can talk about it because it will be known to them. It doesn't make Indus central to Hindu mythology. And Rigveda talks about Indus river but it doesn't talk about the magnificent cities built around it? By any stretch of imagination, Harrappa and Mohen-jo-Daro would be a site to behold for any human of that time yet Rigveda has no mention of them or their civilization? Could it be that people writing it had no idea about Indus Civilization?

Ancient Indians ruling the Dalits of Pakistan from Pataliputra:
View attachment 273994

@Atanz
 
They don't want to do archaelogical excavation in Central and Southern India since they are fearful that they will find their real archaelogical roots in those regions. They are consequently fixated on Pakistan's archaelogical roots.

What if there was far older and greater civilization than IVC existed there and influenced IVC? And instead of claiming every random drawing found as one of god they actually find the origins of those gods in south?
 
First of all we are talking of period 2500 B.C. to 1500 B.C. here. At that time there are only three civilizations in the world at that time. Sumerian, Egyptian and Indus Valley.

Not true. The Chinese civilization of Xia was also comparable.

Xia dynasty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What if there was far older and greater civilization than IVC existed there and influenced IVC? And instead of claiming every random drawing found as one of god they actually find the origins of those gods in south?

The Aryan centric North Indians and Hindutva will not start excavations only South Indians can do that on their own.
 
Every blogger pretty much cooks up their own "truth".. the wonders of internet!

Artefacts recovered from IVC sites point to a phenotype similar to West Asians/Baloch/Pashtuns:

dish_priestking.jpeg

Looks like Our PM Modi of Ancient Times :D

On topic India is the worlds largest and most importantly oldest civilization.

Lol blacks claiming Indus is like funniest thing ever

Seems to be true love when you see your beloved lover's face everywhere ?
LOL dude check out the similarities man. And we belive in incarnation. Why not :what:

Not good sign for some reason for someone :chilli::dance3::whistle:

Seems to be true love when you see your beloved's face everywhere. You both seem to be single and same sex marriage is allowed in India !
:devil: Are u a hater of same sex marriage :p:... You support human rights to eat beef in India but not Right to marriage anyone we like :disagree:
 
During Bronze age , Most of the India was Forest . With the coming of Iron age , forests were cleared and some People of IVC migrated to Ganges plains and not Ganges Valley

IVC existed in bronze age. You underestimate bronze age. Just to give you an idea, Egyptian pyramids were constructed in bronze age with bronze tools. If they could cut stones with bronze tools, they could cut trees as well. However Indus basin was not as thickly forested as India because it received less monsoon thus making of civilization possible. Due to thick forests present day India was mostly inhabited with jungle hunters, cattle herders, foragers and jungle food gatherers at that time. Some in early bronze age and some still in stoneware.
 
Mean while even ancient Modi Gi is looking the direction of present day Pakistan and not towards Bangladesh or Sri Lanka

People usually look at beautiful things longer than the ugly ones.

(No disrespect intended)

spread their legs for them

You seem to be doing that for your gay lovers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom