What's new

BJP slams Digvijay Singh for remarks on Hindu refugees

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
BJP slams Digvijay Singh for remarks on Hindu refugees

TNN, Feb 20, 2011, 11.12pm IST

SILCHAR/GUWAHATI: BJP reacted strongly against the remarks of AICC general secretary and Assam in-charge Digvijay Singh on the issue of Hindu refugees from Bangladesh and Pakistan. The party said the Congress leader's remarks against the Hindus "was simply a poll plank and a gesture to appease Muslim voters".

Digvijay, during his visit to the Barak Valley last week, had said all Hindus and Muslims who had come from Bangladesh and Pakistan after a stipulated period of time were treated as infiltrators and illegal migrants. There should not be any special consideration for Hindus, and Muslims were not the only infiltrators, he had said, while addressing a number of public meetings in Cachar, Karimganj and Hailakandi over the couple of days.

He said if a Hindu from Bangladesh has come to India after a stipulated time-frame, he or she should also be treated as an infiltrator or a foreigner. "There's no constitutional provision to treat Hindus coming from Bangladesh and Pakistanis as refugees," Digvijay had said.

"Hindus are victims of the Partition. The senior leader know well the history of India and the circumstances under which the country was partitioned. He knows the fate of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan. The AICC general secretary should remember the Liaquat-Nehru Pact signed by Pakistan's the then prime minister Liaquat Ali Khan and Indian's first PM, Jawaharlal Nehru, in 1950. The agreement sought to guarantee the rights of minorities in both countries after the Partition. Digvijay Singh was simply playing the minority card, with the assembly election coming up, by targeting Hindu refugees," said BJP Cachar district president Kirit Bhushan Purkayasthya on Sunday.

Purkayasthya said BJP understands that Hindus coming to India from either Bangladesh or Pakistan are refugees and the party has been urging upon the government to formulate an act in this regard.

Condemning the comments of the AICC general secretary, the senior BJP leader said Congress would see the repercussions of such comments in the upcoming elections.

Meanwhile, the BJP youth wing on Saturday burnt the effigy of Congress leader Digvijay Singh in Silchar. The members staged protests in different parts of the town against the Congress leader's "anti-Hindu" remarks.

BJP Maligaon unit in Guwahati also burnt the effigy of Singh in retaliation to his comment on Hindu migrants from Bangladesh.

"Congress has divided the country in the name of religion and even today it is doing politics in the name of religion. BJP opposes the anti-secular Congress government for sheltering illegal migrants here for their vote bank politics," alleged Jayanta Das, former president of Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM).
 
.
I still can not understand mind set of this radical extremist hindu politicians of India... At 1st this bharti politicians blamed congress for supporting illegal migrants and under claiming that both muslim and hindu illegal migrants are refugee are foreigners... now this radical extremist hindu politicians started to whining that he is anti hindu and saying all these to appease the muslim... From all these it is quite apparent that this story made by bhartis about illegal immigrants are only meant for election time vite bank politics... If really there are 20 million illegal bangladeshi migrants are there why neither of these bharati parties ever provided any such proof to bangladeshi government??? N if they have so much love for the hindu migrants they should provide Indian citizenship to them those who migrated to india during 1971 war or just after that... n it is quite logical to give citizenship to the people those who are living in places for 30-40 years... n case closed...N bharatis can keep their anti migration issue with themselves... I have found 1 source which made this funny and imaginary 20 million illegal migration number... soon will post about that n will debunk that in front of the bhartis and will shut their big mouth forever regarding this issue...
 
. .
can some one from outside get legitimacy in india just because he is hindu ? i think congress is right.if hindus in bangladesh are treated badly we can request the bangladeshi govt to look in to it..can pressurize them..that's all we can do.
 
.
I still can not understand mind set of this radical extremist hindu politicians of India... At 1st this bharti politicians blamed congress for supporting illegal migrants and under claiming that both muslim and hindu illegal migrants are refugee are foreigners... now this radical extremist hindu politicians started to whining that he is anti hindu and saying all these to appease the muslim... From all these it is quite apparent that this story made by bhartis about illegal immigrants are only meant for election time vite bank politics... If really there are 20 million illegal bangladeshi migrants are there why neither of these bharati parties ever provided any such proof to bangladeshi government??? N if they have so much love for the hindu migrants they should provide Indian citizenship to them those who migrated to india during 1971 war or just after that... n it is quite logical to give citizenship to the people those who are living in places for 30-40 years... n case closed...N bharatis can keep their anti migration issue with themselves... I have found 1 source which made this funny and imaginary 20 million illegal migration number... soon will post about that n will debunk that in front of the bhartis and will shut their big mouth forever regarding this issue...

And, it is the India who claims to be a pure secular country. Similiar example: Israel claims itself a secular country ( for reference plz read jerusalem posts daily feeds).
 
.
can some one from outside get legitimacy in india just because he is hindu ? i think congress is right.if hindus in bangladesh are treated badly we can request the bangladeshi govt to look in to it..can pressurize them..that's all we can do.

This is what one of your fellow indian posted on the articles comment section...

"govind (hyderabad)
7 hrs ago (06:02 PM)
It is so ironical that a hindu coming back to his native place is treated as termed by Mr. sing to come to power Instead if they respect them he would get more votes. "
 
.
And, it is the India who claims to be a pure secular country. Similiar example: Israel claims itself a secular country ( for reference plz read jerusalem posts daily feeds).

India is the most racist and anti minority country in the sub continent... that is why you will communal riot on a regular basis on different part of India... You will see radical extremist hindu politicians are ranting against minority and discriminated against them during election time but no such thing you will see even from the jamatis who are the most right wing in bangladesh...

This illegal migrants issue is mostly a election time vote bank politics issue ... nothing else...
 
.
India is the most racist and anti minority country in the sub continent... that is why you will communal riot on a regular basis on different part of India... You will see radical extremist hindu politicians are ranting against minority and discriminated against them during election time but no such thing you will see even from the jamatis who are the most right wing in bangladesh...

This illegal migrants issue is mostly a election time vote bank politics issue ... nothing else...

Well guess its too bad..the rest of world, does not see us as such.. after all its not us who have mixed religion and state..unlike you.
 
.
Well guess its too bad..the rest of world, does not see us as such.. after all its not us who have mixed religion and state..unlike you.

do you want you to provide links what the rest of the world has told about you during gujrat and orissa massacre of muslim and christians??? It is your country which mix religion and politics that you can easily see in the statement by your politicians ... teke for example read this article.. it is speaking itselfs..
 
.
India is the most racist and anti minority country in the sub continent... that is why you will communal riot on a regular basis on different part of India... You will see radical extremist hindu politicians are ranting against minority and discriminated against them during election time but no such thing you will see even from the jamatis who are the most right wing in bangladesh...

This illegal migrants issue is mostly a election time vote bank politics issue ... nothing else...

bangladeshi members are hell bend on bringing back islamic rule in bangladesh and you are saying secular india which gives more privileges to minorities is anti minority.
there is no major incidents of riots happened recently in india..all you can say is a gujarath riot which is long back.
 
.
do you want you to provide links what the rest of the world has told about you during gujrat and orissa massacre of muslim and christians??? It is your country which mix religion and politics that you can easily see in the statement by your politicians ... teke for example read this article.. it is speaking itselfs..

Despite that our constitution and are law remains free of religion..we can only imagine plight of your politicians..where religion itself is incorporated into the constitution.
 
.
Well guess its too bad..the rest of world, does not see us as such.. after all its not us who have mixed religion and state..unlike you.

Our hindu ppl are definitely lucky being with the 90% of people. Those 90% people are muslims. Do we need to represent us as a mixed religions country? We are doing it cause Bangladeshi ppl are not religiously extremist.
 
.
This is what one of your fellow indian posted on the articles comment section...

"govind (hyderabad)
7 hrs ago (06:02 PM)
It is so ironical that a hindu coming back to his native place is treated as termed by Mr. sing to come to power Instead if they respect them he would get more votes. "

you know it's highly debatable matter..i would have supported hindus coming back to india with in 5 years of partition period ( because pakistan is islamic country created for muslims) or so..but after so many years it seems illogical.
 
.
bangladeshi members are hell bend on bringing back islamic rule in bangladesh and you are saying secular india which gives more privileges to minorities is anti minority.
there is no major incidents of riots happened recently in india..all you can say is a gujarath riot which is long back.

Do know this, where u r calling indian muslims as minority. We have no word as minority ppl in our constitution. Learn from us, how to respect ppl.
 
.
Our hindu ppl are definitely lucky being with the 90% of people. Those 90% people are muslims. Do we need to represent us as a mixed religions country? We are doing it cause Bangladeshi ppl are not religiously extremist.

Are you saying ..you are doing you minorities a favour and its not a Birth right, to be treated equally despite their religion??
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom