What's new

Bilawal says PTI’s policy of ‘appeasing TTP’ reversed

The real decision makers are sat in GHQ whether Ik is pro taliabn or
not, does not matter.

These operations are ongoing since 2005 and Pak has lost over 100
billion in the economy.
It does matter which government is pro-TTP and which establishment is pro-Afghan Talibans. They are keys to the critical understanding of the kind coverts wars and what for.

Afghan Talibans, former Mujahideens, are pro-Pakistan and Indian-based Afghan-based TTP is anti-Pakistani and possibly anti-Islam which explains their attacks strictly on Muslims only.

Main establishments created Afghan Mujahideen to resist USSR invasion and broke USSR apart and then weakened USA and bled them in Afghanistan for years. So it is clear that main establishments prioritized are not compromised.

Whereas Imran khan is compromised due to his pro-stance of TTP that is Indian-funded bent on killing Muslims on spot and destabilizing Pakistan for years amounting up to 100k in killing including children and women.

There is reason why Pakistan main establishments launched military operations through the governments especially Zarb-e-Azb with the collaboration between former PM Nawaz Sharif and former General Raheel Sharif. That decision saved Pakistan from what could have been heading to unknown disasters and khan was not happy with the military operations against TTP.

Who in right mind would support khan for his pro-stances of TTP that is good as khawarij aka terrorist-outfit? Remember what Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) said in regards to khawarij; kill them for verily they are worst scum of all; pretenders of so-called pious Muslims who may fool you in thinking they are best in conduct of Islamic lifestyles while their recitations of Holy Quran won't go below their throats meaning they will do the opposite of what Holy Quran has said. And the very same khawarij will attack Imam Mahdi one day.

You can rest assured that TTP is menace to Muslim worlds and anyone who supports Khawarijs aka terrorist-outfit like TTP/ISIS are either clueless or compromised.
 
Last edited:
.
It does matter which government is pro-TTP and which establishment is pro-Afghan Talibans. They are keys to the critical understanding of the kind coverts wars and what for.

Well Khan is not in power lets see where this operation gets you, it's not the first
operation launched and it won't be the last.
 
.
Well Khan is not in power lets see where this operation gets you, it's not the first
operation launched and it won't be the last.
Considering it is PMLN in powers again, military operations are on board In Shaa ALLAAH like the last time from 2014 under former PM Nawaz Sharif. Imran khan won't be pleased again.
 
.
ISLAMABAD/ HYDERABAD:
In a reversal of the policy adopted by the previous Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government of talks with the outlawed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the coalition government would quit “the policy of appeasement” of terrorists, Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said on Tuesday.


Speaking at a news conference in Dadu district of Sindh, Bilawal drew distinction between the Tehreek-e-Taliban Afghanistan and Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, saying that the former was a “reality” with “a history” of existence, while the later was nothing but a terrorist organisation.

He slammed the PTI government for taking an “idiotic” decision of not only embracing the terrorists living in Pakistan, but also welcoming those who were staying in Afghanistan. He accused the previous government of making the people feel that the country had lost the war against terrorism.

“At the NSC’s [National Security Committee] meeting we have decided that we won’t accept Imran Khan’s experiment and policy of appeasement and that we will establish writ of the Constitution and action will be taken against terrorists,” the foreign minister told journalists.

The NSC is the highest forum on national security and foreign policy. The forum reviewed the Afghan strategy, particularly efforts to seek a peace deal with the banned TTP in a meeting on Monday, chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and attended by the top military brass and key federal ministers.

After revisiting the strategy pursued by the PTI government, the NSC took some major policy decisions, seeking reversal of some of the flawed plans. A source in Islamabad told The Express Tribune that the NSC decided “there will be no longer any dialogue” with the TTP.

The decision to pull out of the peace process was taken because of the negative fallout of seeking talks with the TTP. The source said that Pakistan would now convey its decision to the Afghan government that the country would no longer seek any talks with the TTP.

There was realisation among the NSC members that the TTP only used talks to regroup. Bilawal claimed that Taliban were taking space under the nose of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government. He mentioned Imran’s statement in which the PTI chief had allegedly said that he helped settle 50,000 TTP men in Pakistan.

According to Bilawal, Pakistan had actually won the war against terrorism but still the previous PTI government decided to free imprisoned terrorists, who were allegedly involved in APS [Army Public School] and many other terrorist attacks.

“We achieved something which the US, NATO [North Atlantic Treaty Organisation] and the whole world couldn’t achieve in Afghanistan,” he said. “Pakistani soldiers cleared the territories of Swat, North Waziristan, Karachi and Balochistan from the scourge of terrorism.”

Also read: National security hinges on economic sovereignty, says NSC

A source familiar with the development told The Express Tribune, the civil and military leadership had now decided to reverse some of the policies pursued by the previous dispensation on Afghanistan and set new “red lines” to protect the core national interests.

According to the source, the Afghan Taliban regime would be conveyed in clear terms that Pakistan would not tolerate sanctuaries operating out of Afghanistan. They would be given time to get rid of those sanctuaries, the source said.

Pakistan had pursued direct talks with the TTP after the Afghan Taliban returned to power in Kabul in August 2021. Talks did produce some results initially when the TTP announced a ceasefire in November that year and then agreed to an indefinite truce in June last year.

Though the Afghan Taliban were also in favour of talks, it was Pakistan’s decision to seek a peace deal with the TTP. “We could have opted for other options but the decision makers at that time felt it was the best decision,” said a senior figure in Islamabad, while requesting anonymity.

The official admitted that it would be a challenge now to walk away from talks mediated by the Afghan Taliban. But the official was confident that Pakistan would convince the Taliban regime about the policy shift vis-à-vis the TTP.

In return for truce in June 2022, Pakistani authorities allowed a number of TTP members to return as part of a confidence-building measure. However, the returning militants later regrouped and started targeting security forces. On November 28, just a day before the change of command at the GHQ, the TTP ended the ceasefire.

Even during the ceasefire period, the number of terrorist attacks had been on the rise. The group even took responsibility for the first suicide attack in Islamabad since 2014. The surge in these attacks led Pakistani authorities to revisit its strategy and now concluded that pursuing talks with the TTP was a mistake.
Good job by this son of Benazir Bhutto. Pakistan is making some key decisions that will shape the geo strategic landscape for the region in the coming months and years.
 
.
Everything was running fine when PTI had the govt then these jokers came in and now since they cant run the country placing blame on PTI. Leave the govt if you cant run it.
 
.
You have to be strict when dealing with border and internal security, but diplomatic when dealing intentionally or locally.

Ensuring safety and security is LEA / Army etc. responsibility, and Diplomacy is Govt.'s job, both must work within their domain to achieve objectives.

You always end up in problems, when you ignore description and assigned role. Politicians are also guilty because they are always runny away from responsibilities and asking for interference.

Example: IK still asking Establishment to play its role in making sure of elections etc......
 
.
Considering it is PMLN in powers again, military operations are on board In Shaa ALLAAH like the last time from 2014 under former PM Nawaz Sharif. Imran khan won't be pleased again.
And in pti time there was no such need as operation.
Blind are you so the ppl who support pdm. We are surfing becoz ppl like you.

Example: IK still asking Establishment to play its role in making sure of elections etc......
Because public of pakistan has no power and country is going way down.
 
.
Because public of pakistan has no power and country is going way down.
I understand that, but how all this will end?

If we keep saying they are interfering, and at the same time we keep asking them to interfere. If they are the reason, whatever happened to IK, than stop asking them to do the same again.

use your public power, otherwise you are still trying to be part of the wrongs, which you blame day and night.

I am NEUTRAL. I have a soft corner for IK but wrong will remain wrong no matter who does it.
 
. .
I understand that, but how all this will end?

If we keep saying they are interfering, and at the same time we keep asking them to interfere. If they are the reason, whatever happened to IK, than stop asking them to do the same again.

use your public power, otherwise you are still trying to be part of the wrongs, which you blame day and night.

I am NEUTRAL. I have a soft corner for IK but wrong will remain wrong no matter who does it.
Public power is only in election, rest no public want to do anything.

So imran khan should.sit back and let the ship sink and once its done and dusted hand over to imran khan to make it stand on its feet and then again do the regime change and keep reapting it?

Its better to go in election and let public decide.

Leave soft corner to imran khan just do comparison based on performance, give me 1 thing sector that this pdm is doing better than Imran khan's time?
all this pdm done was all their cases closed thats it.
 
Last edited:
.
Public power is only in election, rest no public want to do anything.

So imran khan should.sit back and let the ship sink and once its done and dusted hand over to imran khan to make it stand on its feet and then again do the regime change and keep reapting it?

Its better to go in election and let public decide.
Yes, i understand that, but asking neutrals to play role is same like IK demands to make that same DOP head of JIT of his assassination case.

You just cant keep saying they Interfered / removed you and installed imported Govt. and now interfere again please and make election happened or make my return possible.

IKs huge support base is based on this narrative that "NEUTRALS" played major role in regime change operation,

My stupid mind is thinking, He is in favour of their interference or not.
 
.
Yes, i understand that, but asking neutrals to play role is same like IK demands to make that same DOP head of JIT of his assassination case.

You just cant keep saying they Interfered / removed you and installed imported Govt. and now interfere again please and make election happened or make my return possible.

IKs huge support base is based on this narrative that "NEUTRALS" played major role in regime change operation,

My stupid mind is thinking, He is in favour of their interference or not.
this pdm itehad blah thing is not natural and wouldnt stand 1 day without support next day would be election day.
 
.
It does matter which government is pro-TTP and which establishment is pro-Afghan Talibans. They are keys to the critical understanding of the kind coverts wars and what for.

Afghan Talibans, former Mujahideens, are pro-Pakistan and Indian-based Afghan-based TTP is anti-Pakistani and possibly anti-Islam which explains their attacks strictly on Muslims only.

Main establishments created Afghan Mujahideen to resist USSR invasion and broke USSR apart and then weakened USA and bled them in Afghanistan for years. So it is clear that main establishments prioritized are not compromised.

Whereas Imran khan is compromised due to his pro-stance of TTP that is Indian-funded bent on killing Muslims on spot and destabilizing Pakistan for years amounting up to 100k in killing including children and women.

There is reason why Pakistan main establishments launched military operations through the governments especially Zarb-e-Azb with the collaboration between former PM Nawaz Sharif and former General Raheel Sharif. That decision saved Pakistan from what could have been heading to unknown disasters and khan was not happy with the military operations against TTP.

Who in right mind would support khan for his pro-stances of TTP that is good as khawarij aka terrorist-outfit? Remember what Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) said in regards to khawarij; kill them for verily they are worst scum of all; pretenders of so-called pious Muslims who may fool you in thinking they are best in conduct of Islamic lifestyles while their recitations of Holy Quran won't go below their throats meaning they will do the opposite of what Holy Quran has said. And the very same khawarij will attack Imam Mahdi one day.

You can rest assured that TTP is menace to Muslim worlds and anyone who supports Khawarijs aka terrorist-outfit like TTP/ISIS are either clueless or compromised.

IK has support of the strong jewish lobby and had soft corner towards both India and TTP.

Afghan Talibans, former Mujahideens, are pro-Pakistan and Indian-based Afghan-based TTP is anti-Pakistani

This is something most people fail to understand.
 
.
this pdm itehad blah thing is not natural and wouldnt stand 1 day without support next day would be election day.
I agree, I just dont like IK asking Establishment to play its role, Establishment has no role. By asking this, in my POV, he is becoming part of the problem.
 
.
IK has support of the strong jewish lobby and had soft corner towards both India and TTP.



This is something most people fail to understand.
lol its your pmln who opened trade with india,it was your nawaz who said in india that kargil was pakistan army dhoka given to indian army. It was your nawaz who said mumbai attack was done by army. Its your nawaz who has business in india and you blaming having softcorner for india to imran khan

Are you really such low?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom