What's new

Bilateral relations: No real progress if Mumbai ‘wishlist’ ignored: India

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
Bilateral relations: No real progress if Mumbai

NEW DELHI: Indian Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid has cautioned Pakistan that no substantive progress can be made in bilateral relations if New Delhi’s expectations from Islamabad are ignored in bringing the Mumbai terror suspects to justice, Press Trust of India reported on Sunday.

It said Pakistan’s response to India’s `wishlist’ with regard to those behind the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks is `critical’ to substantive movement in the bilateral dialogue.

What Islamabad has done so far about it is ‘not to our satisfaction’, Mr Khurshid told Press Trust of India in an interview, while taking stock of ties between the neighbours in 2012.

Mr Khurshid did not see the allegedly provocative statements made by Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik while he was in India recently as a ‘setback’ in the dialogue process.

What is said or what gesture is made is not ‘critical’, he said. “I don’t see it as a setback at all. But I do believe and (what) we all believe in this country is that dialogue will move smoothly, faster and in a right direction provided the wishlist lying with Pakistan given by India as far as the Mumbai tragedy is concerned is responded to. That is a critical thing, not what is said, not what gesture is made.

“Ultimately, it is the delivery of the fundamental aspects that are required to be fulfilled…Unless that is done, we will not have substantive movement. And it has not been done to satisfaction,” the minister said.

Asked about the delay in Pakistan granting Most Favoured Nation status to India, Mr Khurshid said India would do whatever needed to be done to persuade them to move on this.

“We believe that it should have been done. We will do whatever needs to be done to persuade them that we should now be able to do it. It is not something which should be delayed indefinitely. It is not something we should just forget that it happened.

“We have to get them back on track. If they have problems, they will certainly express them to us and obviously when it was being negotiated, they must have factored in all the different pulls and pushes, but we would like it to be moved forward and we will certainly persuade them to do so,” the minister said, adding that the issue “is always on the agenda”.
 
.
AFter the yesterday incident surely we don't need any bilateral trade. thanks

Its better to have an enemy rather than a snake in your back yard on the name of AMAN KI ASHA
 
.
AFter the yesterday incident surely we don't need any bilateral trade. thanks

Its better to have an enemy rather than a snake in your back yard on the name of AMAN KI ASHA

exactly man.it goes for u.
 
.
AFter the yesterday incident surely we don't need any bilateral trade. thanks

Its better to have an enemy rather than a snake in your back yard on the name of AMAN KI ASHA

rightly said........:tup:
 
. .
Finally, our govt. shown some firm stance.
 
. . .
No trade . no relations with Hindus.
After yesterdays incident when our team n our chairman of PCB was in their capital for peace itself n they have stabbed us in the back.
and now they r back on their demands.

How pathetic.
 
.
when it comes to Pakistan and India relations, it does not take long for peace overtures to become war mongering talk . Have patience and solve the issue peacefully.
 
.
Honestly, good relations are more in India's favor than Pakistan.
Pakistan is the corridor to Central Asia for India and they won't get that until they have good relations with us.
They can use Iran or other ways, but the most cost effective way is via Pakistan.
And remember, Pakistan has the worlds largest economy, oil rich Iran, and access to Central Asia all on it's border.
So if status quo stays than it is India who is losing out more.

not says it is vital for India to have good relations with Pakistan, just says it would be in her favor if it was true.
 
.
No trade . no relations with Hindus.
After yesterdays incident when our team n our chairman of PCB was in their capital for peace itself n they have stabbed us in the back.
and now they r back on their demands.

How pathetic.

In 99, our PM was in Lahore and Pak did a Kargil on India.

Backstabbing ?
 
. .
so it takes you 13 years to back stab pakistan?

There is no backstabbing at all. What would you call the death of an Indian soldier who died last month due to Pak firing ?

Those who have served on the LC will appreciate the dynamics of what goes on on both sides.

In any case, is there a ' best before' or an expiry date for retaliations ?

Pak will do it next when it gets an opportunity , India will repay the compliment.

It goes on..

The point I wanted to make is that after Kargil which was a recent example of such acts, Pak I felt ought not to use words like ' backstabbing".
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom