What's new

Bilateral dialogue will not start because of Kartarpur opening: Sushma Swaraj

Nahh......your biggest market sales of ammunition to terrorists is in Afghanistan.
It's funny Indians wish to trade with Afghanistan via Pakistan, but don't wish directly with Pakistan.
 
. .
Pakistani generals live in houses bigger than New Delhi and Pakistani politicians with bigger bank account then, Indian government, But GOP is broke, you aren't a threat to anyone. Pakistan wants India on the negotiating Table, it's very simple, send Bakistani back to the caves, Improve your economy and buy or produce weapons that can threaten Indians and they be will at the negotiating table before the sunset.
 
.
Pakistani generals live in houses bigger than New Delhi and Pakistani politicians with bigger bank account then, Indian government, But GOP is broke, you aren't a threat to anyone. Pakistan wants India on the negotiating Table, it's very simple, send Bakistani back to the caves, Improve your economy and buy or produce weapons that can threaten Indians and they will at the negotiating table before the sunset.

In the meantime, we will obviously be waiting patiently for Pakistan. India will be a 6 trillion dollar economy by 2030. The gap between India and Pakistan is only going to get bigger.

Pakistan had the window till the 1990s and it was closing down slowly, hence the desperate last attempt in the form of Kargil.
 
.
Historically Pakistan has lost all wars with India. So good luck with that

Historically and technically, you are a victim of the same propaganda and disinformation, which most people fall prey to.

We did lose East Pakistan, yes, and that too thanks to the overwhelming odds involved in the conflict itself, in an area completely surrounded by the hostiles with no possibility of support or supplies.

But I would like to learn and understand how exactly did we lose the war waged on us in 1965 (ofcourse due to our misadventures across line of control, but still we were not the ones opening the border)

And how exactly did we lose Kargil? Given we not only took the peaks but also bled their forces and gave them a hammering, and helped them understand how vulnerable they are.
Except Mr. Nawaz effing up the end game....
 
.
In the meantime, we will obviously be waiting patiently for Pakistan. India will be a 6 trillion dollar economy by 2030. The gap between India and Pakistan is only going to get bigger.

Pakistan had the window till the 1990s and it was closing down slowly, hence the desperate last attempt in the form of Kargil.

Sure, what ever you say kid.
 
.
Historically and technically, you are a victim of the same propaganda and disinformation, which most people fall prey to.

We did lose East Pakistan, yes, and that too thanks to the overwhelming odds involved in the conflict itself, in an area completely surrounded by the hostiles with no possibility of support or supplies.

But I would like to learn and understand how exactly did we lose the war waged on us in 1965 (ofcourse due to our misadventures across line of control, but still we were not the ones opening the border)

And how exactly did we lose Kargil? Given we not only took the peaks but also bled their forces and gave them a hammering, and helped them understand how vulnerable they are.
Except Mr. Nawaz effing up the end game....

1965 war was imposed on you? Pakistan started the 1965 war :rofl:
 
.
Pakistani generals live in houses bigger than New Delhi and Pakistani politicians with bigger bank account then, Indian government, But GOP is broke, you aren't a threat to anyone. Pakistan wants India on the negotiating Table, it's very simple, send Bakistani back to the caves, Improve your economy and buy or produce weapons that can threaten Indians and they be will at the negotiating table before the sunset.
Lol. None of Indian neighbors are in any threatening position because none have nuclear weapons. Yet Indians have peaceful relations with all except Pakistan. It's the only way Indian politicians can remain in power.

Pakistan had the window till the 1990s and it was closing down slowly, hence the desperate last attempt in the form of Kargil.
Pakistani adventure at Kargil happened right after Pakistans global demonstration as nuclear armed state. Meaning they didn't want peace back then, things have changed now.
 
. . .
1965 war was imposed on you? Pakistan started the 1965 war :rofl:
Pakistan violated LOC in 1965 and 1999. Gained no victory. India violated international boundaries in 1971 and 1984, both resulting in victories. In 1971 East Pakistan was captured. In 1984 Siachin Glacier was captured.
 
.
"Until and unless Pakistan stops terrorist activities in India, there will be no dialogue and we will not participate in Saarc [conference]," asserted Swaraj.


Some audacity at display here. Specially days after Chinese consulate terror attack in Karachi where all fingers are pointing at India. What worrying though, from Pakistan side, both GOP and establishment do not give shut up call to India right there and then.
 
. .
1965 war was imposed on you? Pakistan started the 1965 war :rofl:

Perhaps you should re read my post to comprehend it properly before jumping in with your craziness?

And when you have done that and understood that.
Then open your mind and get off your bollywood drug for a bit, and comprehend this, we don;t follow your bollywood inflicted craziness on your mind.

And if you still lake the brains to comprehend any of it, then you are in the wrong place in the first place...

Pakistan violated LOC in 1965 and 1999. Gained no victory. India violated international boundaries in 1971 and 1984, both resulting in victories. In 1971 East Pakistan was captured. In 1984 Siachin Glacier was captured.

Pakistan violated LOC in 1965 but not the International Border.
india opened the International Border with their suprise advance in Lahore and Sialkot Sectors.
So what did we lose?
The violation of LOC? Or defending ourselves from the indian advances?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom