What's new

Bigoted hatred of Muslims at 'epidemic' level: UN chief

I have been perfectly coherent. It is you who disregards the elephant in the room.

Your fundamental problem is that the IVC originated in Pakistan. Ours is an older nation than yours. Even the genetic tests on the Rakhigiri specimen confirm her origins in Pakistan. The major consequential bone of contention for you and other pseudo-secularists is that Hinduism's roots lie in Pakistan on the banks of the Indus, not in India on the Gangetic plains. You and I both know that this alone is the reason that Delhi MUST maintain its claim over Pakistani history. This is the true challenge for those of your ilk. Imagine the furore in temples across the land if history books taught "Hinduism's roots lie in ancient Pakistan". You people would cut your own livers out in rage, starting with the oh so adorable little "show-secularists".

Be proud of your parts of the IVC by all means, but dissociate yourselves from our parts ...if you think you can.

View attachment 725862



You guys dissociate from our parts first..stop claiming Rakhigarhi specimen...Find your own bones and do genetic testing on them .In your own map Rakhigarhi is not even covered within the IVC range..so why claim the Rakhigarhi genes in your post? Decoherence much?.....There is a way to resolve this in an intelligent manner with nuance, but Pakistani posters on PDF (I am talking of intelligent ones like @Indus Pakistan and others) have been reluctant to show that nuance on this topic....
 
.
You and your comprehension skills are disturbingly poor.
Read it again ,you might get what's written their.
Nobody I repeat nobody outside your books have heard of "ancient pakistan" 😂

Ancient India is Sindh basically. Your are living on borrowed history like Afrocentric Africans live on borrowed Egyptian history.
You guys dissociate from our parts first..stop claiming Rakhigarhi specimen...Find your own bones and do genetic testing on them .In your own map Rakhigarhi is not even covered within the IVC range..so why claim the Rakhigarhi genes in your post? Decoherence much?.....There is a way to resolve this in an intelligent manner with nuance, but Pakistani posters on PDF (I am talking of intelligent ones like @Indus Pakistan and others) have been reluctant to show that nuance on this topic....

Rakhigarhi is not core IVC. It was found at the Eastern fringes of the range. Genetically the specimen was found to be around 60-65% ancient Iranian and 35-40% black Andamanese type. Basically the sort of mixture one would expect at the boundary of the IVC range. Rest of Indian peninsula was populated by completely Andamanese related adivasi hunter gatherers.
 
. .
Ancient India is Sindh basically. Your are living on borrowed history like Afrocentric Africans live on borrowed Egyptian history.


Rakhigarhi is not core IVC. It was found at the Eastern fringes of the range. Genetically the specimen was found to be around 60-65% ancient Iranian and 35-40% black Andamanese type. Basically the sort of mixture one would expect at the boundary of the IVC range. Rest of Indian peninsula was populated by completely Andamanese related adivasi hunter gatherers.



Doesnot matter..It is within India..and Its our history and our ancestors...Pakistanis can find their own skeletons and do their own digging....our black genes contributed to our part of IVC...Pakistani's Iranian genes contributed to their part of IVC...we are different and seperate since time began...so I request them to stop using our skeletons for their own nationalist purposes
 
.
''As the Holy Quran reminds us: nations and tribes were created to know one another. Diversity is a richness, not a threat,'' the UN chief reminded.

The best part of the statement! The Noble Qur'an teaches all humanity, only if we are willing to have faith in Allah Subhanahu Wata'aalah and learn from HIS Word.
 
. .
Ancient India is Sindh basically. Your are living on borrowed history like Afrocentric Africans live on borrowed Egyptian history.


Rakhigarhi is not core IVC. It was found at the Eastern fringes of the range. Genetically the specimen was found to be around 60-65% ancient Iranian and 35-40% black Andamanese type. Basically the sort of mixture one would expect at the boundary of the IVC range. Rest of Indian peninsula was populated by completely Andamanese related adivasi hunter gatherers.
THIS is precisely the sort of *nuance* our eastern friends struggle to rationalise.
Doesnot matter..It is within India..and Its our history and our ancestors...Pakistanis can find their own skeletons and do their own digging....our black genes contributed to our part of IVC...Pakistani's Iranian genes contributed to their part of IVC...we are different and seperate since time began...so I request them to stop using our skeletons for their own nationalist purposes
Pakistan cannot help it if the skeleton in Rakhigiri shows origins in Pakistan. We certainly dissociate from the physical land of Rakhigiri, but archaeology and genetic testing doesn't lie. We are your fathers. Why should we deny this?
 
. . .
You and your comprehension skills are disturbingly poor.
Read it again ,you might get what's written their.
Nobody I repeat nobody outside your books have heard of "ancient pakistan" 😂
Pakistan as a country was formed on 47, just like the present day country called India a day later. The respective history of both regions is thousands of years old - in Pakistans case it is one of the inheritor of the Mughal empire history as far back as the Indus Valley civilization, whose people are majorly what constitutes Pakistan now.
Numbers don't matter, Israelis are tiny they still kick every muslim neighbouring country.
Ahem with backing of large powers of this time, like USA, Europe etc.

Islam is growing in the most poor areas be in economically, technologically or anything.

By going like this It might grow in numbers but never in value addition or respect.
Islam is for all, rich or poor, and it doesn’t care if only poor people are joining the faith more.
I didn't know USA and EU are also poor where Islam continues to grow despite extreme narrative of hate propagated.
 
Last edited:
.
Doesnot matter..It is within India..and Its our history and our ancestors...Pakistanis can find their own skeletons and do their own digging....our black genes contributed to our part of IVC...Pakistani's Iranian genes contributed to their part of IVC...we are different and seperate since time began...so I request them to stop using our skeletons for their own nationalist purposes
Please back up your nonsense with historical and archaeological proofs.
The history within the lands of people of Pakistan is inherited after its creation in 47, just like Indians inherited their regional history after its formation a day later than Pakistan -( moot point but technically Pakistan is 1 day more ancient then the present day country called India)
 
. .

200.gif
 
.
Pakistan as a country was formed on 47, just like the present day country called India a day later. The respective history of both regions is thousands of years old - in Pakistans case it is one of the inheritor of the Mughal empire history as far back as the Indus Valley civilization, whose people are majorly what constitutes Pakistan now.

Not at all, I'll give you a hint.
We celebrate our independence day not birthday on 15th August.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom