What's new

Bigoted hatred of Muslims at 'epidemic' level: UN chief

Everyone in the world ......Atheists, Christians Jews, Hindus,Buddhists etc hate muslims ?

Ever thought why ?

Are all of them bigoted ? Or it is just a stupid generalisation to avoid the necessary introspection and keep continuing with the victim card.


At one time the world hated Jews as well. There is anti-Hindu bigotry also? ( Link ) . Are you comfortable with a that ?
 
.
Everyone in the world ......Atheists, Christians Jews, Hindus,Buddhists etc hate muslims ?

Ever thought why ?

Are all of them bigoted ? Or it is just a stupid generalisation to avoid the necessary introspection and keep continuing with the victim card.
We love that filth like you despise us. Heaven protect all Muslims from the day when people like you start liking us and trying to be our buddies.
 
.
For you Japanese ,indigenous African Countries ,India and numerous other countries have no culture but muslims have one , the same muslims who won't be able to talk to each other as they don't even share a language forget culture :lol:

As of our Indian culture i'll let others speak :-

William H Gilbert said in his Peoples of India: “In the history of human culture, the contribution of the Indian people in all fields has been of the greatest importance. From India we are said to have derived domestic poultry, shellac, lemons, cotton, jute, rice, sugar, indigo, the buffalo, cinnamon, ginger, pepper, sugar-cane, the games of chess, pachisi, and polo, the zero concept, the decimal system, the basis of certain philological concepts, a wealth of fables with moral import, an astonishing variety of artistic products, and innumerable ideas of philosophy and religion such as asceticism and monasticism.”
In this same regard, Rabindranatha Tagore also related, “I cannot but bring to your mind those days when the whole of Eastern Asia, from Burma to Japan was united with India in the closest ties of friendship.”
A. L. Basham also felt that India was extremely important, as he says in his Cultural History of India: “There are four main cradles of civilization, from which elements of culture have spread to other parts of the world. These are, moving from east to west, China, the Indian subcontinent, the ‘Fertile Crescent’, and the Mediterranean, especially Greece and Italy. Of these four areas, India deserves a larger share of the credit than she is usually given, because, on a minimum assessment, she has deeply affected the religious life of most of Asia, as well as extending her influence, directly or indirectly, to other parts of the world.”
Pierre Sonnerat also explained, “We find among the Indians the vestiges of the most remote antiquity... We know that all peoples came there to draw the elements of their knowledge... India, in her splendour, gave religions and laws to all the other peoples; Egypt and Greece owed to her both their fables and their wisdom.” 4
The German historian and novelist Friedrich Schlegel saw in Sanskrit the “original language,” or what is now called the Proto-Indo-European language, and declared in 1803 that, “Everything without exception is of Indian origin... ” 5 Also, “Whether directly or indirectly, all nations are originally nothing but Indian colonies... The oriental antiquity could, if we consented to deepen it, bring us back more safely towards the divine.” 6
Regardless of how much various religions in the past or even today have tried to wipe out or minimize the advanced nature of Vedic culture, they still could not do that, as explained as follows by Higgins: “The peninsula of India would be one of the first peopled countries, and its inhabitants would have all the habits of the progenitors of man before the flood in as much perfection or more than any other nation... In short, whatever learning man possessed before his dispersion may be expected to be found here, and of this, Hindustan affords innumerable traces... notwithstanding ... the fruitless efforts of our priests to disguise it.” 7
Even Vedic culture’s deep spirituality is found to be the underlying basis of other religions, as explained by Maurice Maeterlinck: “Thanks to the labors of a science which is comparatively recent, and more especially to the researches of the students of Hindu and Egyptian antiquities, it is very much easier today than it was not so long ago to discover the source, to ascend the course and unravel the underground network of that great mysterious river which since the beginning of history has been flowing beneath all the religions, all the faiths, and all the philosophies: in a word, beneath all the visible and everyday manifestations of human thought. It is now hardly to be contested that this source is to be found in ancient India. Thence in all probability the sacred teaching spread into Egypt, found its way to ancient Persia and Chaldea, permeated the Hebrew race, and crept into Greece and the north of Europe, finally reaching China and even America.” 8
Professor James Traub, in India–The Challenge of Change, goes on to say: “Five thousand years ago, civilization of India was age-old. This civilization should be much older with many millennia of human endeavor behind it. Five thousand years ago, when the peoples of Europe were hauling stones across the face of the continent and grubbing out a meager existence, Indians throughout what is now western and southern Pakistan and Punjab, and even farther to the East, were living in elaborately designed cities, with sturdy houses, broad, straight roads, public baths, and drainage systems that were hardly equaled until the Roman era three thousand years later.... But five thousand years ago, according to archeologist John Marshal, the Indus Valley civilization was already age-old and stereotyped on Indian soil, with many millennia of human endeavor behind it. Usually we think of Mesopotamia as the cradle of civilization, but evidence suggests that the society of northwestern India, which has preserved its essential spirit over countless generations, deserve equal billing.”
Not only was the Vedic Indian influence recognized to the west of India, but also far to the east, as explained by Rene Grousset in Farther India and the Malay Archipelago (Volume II): “In the high plateau of eastern Iran, in the oases of Serindia, in the arid wastes of Tibet, Mongolia, and Manchuria, in the ancient civilized lands of China and Japan, in the lands of the primitive Mons and Khmers and other tribes of India-China, in the countries of the Malaya-Polynesians, in Indonesia and Malay, India left the indelible impress of her high culture, not only upon religion, but also upon art, and literature, in a word, all the higher things of spirit... There is an obstinate prejudice thanks to which India is constantly represented as having lived, as it were, hermetically sealed up in its age-old civilization, apart from the rest of Asia. Nothing could be more exaggerated. During the first eight centuries of our era, so far as religion and art are concerned, central Asia was a sort of Indian colony. It is often forgotten that in the early Middle Ages there existed a ‘Greater India,’ a vast Indian empire. A man coming from the Ganges or the Deccan to Southeast Asia felt as much at home there as in his own native land. In those days the Indian Ocean really deserved its name.”
Will Durant in his Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage, goes on to say, “It is true that even across the Himalayan barrier India has sent to us such questionable gifts as grammar and logic, philosophy and fables, hypnotism and chess, and above all, our numerals and our decimal system. But these are not the essence of her spirit; they are trifles compared to what we may learn from her in the future. As invention, industry and trade bind the continents together, or as they fling us into conflict with Asia, we shall study its civilization more closely, and shall absorb, even in enmity, some of its ways and thoughts. Perhaps, in return for conquest, arrogance and spoliation, India will teach us the tolerance and gentleness of the mature mind, the quiet content of the unacquisitive soul, the calm of the understanding spirit and a unifying, pacifying love for all living things.”


You are nothing in comparison.


Appreciate the Effort....there are thread-ending posts on pdf..many of them come from IndusPakistan ...But this was one of them...just awesome
 
.
Why the hatred for Muslims world over? It's an interesting question to ponder.
Only Hindjews spreading hatred and that because of their Nazi ideology. Apartheid in Palestine, Hindu BJP /RSS neo-Nazis in India, Neocon genocides in Muslim countries etc. Time for Muslims to rise to the challenge and have Islam day combats. Only thing stopping unification of Muslims and resurgence of Islam in the world is the Zion/Hindjew divide and rule success in the Middle East. A temporary success which will be overturned when the corrupts are removed from power.
 
.
Everyone in the world ......Atheists, Christians Jews, Hindus,Buddhists etc hate muslims ?

Ever thought why ?

Are all of them bigoted ? Or it is just a stupid generalisation to avoid the necessary introspection and keep continuing with the victim card.
Non believers are one nation.
 
.
Bigoted hatred of Muslims at 'epidemic' level: UN chief
Antonio Guterres describes skyrocketing anti-Muslim bigotry as part of wider shift globally toward nationalism


Anadolu Agency March 18, 2021

the un chief warned that any military confrontation between pakistan and india would be a disaster of unmitigated proportions for both countries and for the whole world photo reuters file

The UN chief warned that any military confrontation between Pakistan and India would be a disaster of unmitigated proportions for both countries and for the whole world. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE
WASHINGTON:
Hatred and discrimination against Muslims has risen to "epidemic proportions," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned on Wednesday.

Guterres described skyrocketing anti-Muslim bigotry as part of a wider shift globally toward nationalism, and away from minority rights.

"A resurgence in anti-Muslim bigotry is certainly in-line with other distressing trends we are seeing globally: a resurgence in ethno-nationalism, neo-Nazism, stigma and hate speech targeting vulnerable populations including Muslims, Jews, some minority Christian communities, as well as others," Guterres said at a UN event marking the Commemoration of the International Day to Combat Islamophobia.

Also read Pakistan highlights rising Islamophobia at UN event

"Minority communities are part of the richness of our cultural and social fabric, yet we see not only forms of discrimination, but also policies of assimilation that seek to wipe out the cultural and religious identity of minority communities," he added.
''As the Holy Quran reminds us: nations and tribes were created to know one another. Diversity is a richness, not a threat,'' the UN chief reminded.

The International Day to Combat Islamophobia, marked for the first time this year, comes after the March 15, 2019 attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand where 51 people were killed and 49 others injured.


I don’t agree with what he says here and he made it sound like it’s happening everywhere it’s not. Many non-Muslim countries are fine with their Muslim minorities US, UK, Russia, Canada, Thailand etc (a diverse range).
It’s that some nations are drunk on anti-Muslim hate, like India for example.
He should have called a spade a spade.
 
.
Numbers don't matter, Israelis are tiny they still kick every muslim neighbouring country.

Islam is growing in the most poor areas be in economically, technologically or anything.

By going like this It might grow in numbers but never in value addition or respect.

Are you sure about this? The richest countries are actully muslims never forget this. GDP per capita + we have like 30-35 strong countries and also you said don't grow in value I beg to differ. Muslims have ruled your ugly backyard asss for 1000 years that is enough for you to respect me.

You will always respect daddy no matter how rebelious you wanna appear. We earn that from you and everyone else to respect us. We ruled 50% of that known world. These you call masters as well that westerners we ruled majority of them also.

Respect is taken it doesn't come via begging or appearing peaceful or trying to please anyone. If provocations is forced upon us we will take what is ours without being apologetic. Also if the whole world were to gather upon us you will find us amongst these who don't give a Fuk. Nobody can undo us
 
Last edited:
.
I don’t agree with what he says here and he made it sound like it’s happening everywhere it’s not. Many non-Muslim countries are fine with their Muslim minorities US, UK, Russia, Canada, Thailand etc (a diverse range).
It’s that some nations are drunk on anti-Muslim hate, like India for example.
He should have called a spade a spade.

Aren't Thai Buddhists at war with their Muslim population? Muslims, like in other places, want to take part of the nation as their own country.
Canada...google it...only 34% of Canadians (2016) have favorable view of Islam up from 24% in 2013. In the countryside the view would be extremely unfavorable.
 
.
Your first line in itself is factually incorrect and rest of your post is an incoherant rant against one of the oldest civilization on earth, vedic civilization has books , theory's on each and everything be it economics, political science , Upanishads and ring Vedas are oldest testament to knowledge about culture that the world is adopting ,Yoga an Hindu concept is followed all across the world.
We dominate the cultural space and you consider burqa namaz or going to mosque culture.

Their is no comparison.
Lmao...u r just copying the same lie some Indian official was using earlier...so gullible.
Have u ever experienced the west? When u boast that yoga concept is being followed all across the world...do u even know what u r saying?
...first no...not all across the world. Do u see anyone doing yoga in Mozambique? in Peru? Papua New Guinea?
...oh wait by "all across the world" u meant just the white western countries...bcuz that's all the approval u needed right?
...well in that case I would say u should live in these western countries to experience how much of ur culture is being adopted here...the answer is a big fat zero. "Yoga" in the western world that some white ppl do is nothing more than stretching. A few weed smoking surfers with rastafarian braided hair try to take it to the next level by including spirituality in there...but they don't know jack about Hinduism. In reality it is one of those pretentious things to not look like a simpleton...to try and come off as if u r well informed, u have class, and u have travelled far and wide to gain wisdom, etc.
@masterchief_mirza get a load of this guy :cheesy:
 
Last edited:
.
Aren't Thai Buddhists at war with their Muslim population? Muslims, like in other places, want to take part of the nation as their own country.
Canada...google it...only 34% of Canadians (2016) have favorable view of Islam up from 24% in 2013. In the countryside the view would be extremely unfavorable.

No they're not. I used to spend my summers in Thailand and yes that includes the South. They had some separatist issues a while back but its died down.

1616095450911.png
 
. .
At one time the world hated Jews as well. There is anti-Hindu bigotry also? ( Link ) . Are you comfortable with a that ?
A wall is the only solution
Lmao...u r just copying the same lie some Indian official was using earlier...so gullible.
Have u ever experienced the west? When u boast that yoga concept is being followed all across the world...do u even know what u r saying?
...first no...not all across the world. Do u see anyone doing yoga in Mozambique? in Peru? Papua New Guinea?
...oh wait by "all across the world" u meant just the white western countries...bcuz that's all the approval u needed right?
...well in that case I would say u should live in these western countries to experience how much of ur culture is being adopted here...the answer is a big fat zero. "Yoga" in the western world that some white ppl do is nothing more than stretching. A few weed smoking surfers with rastafarian braided hair try to take it to the next level by including spirituality in there...but they don't know jack about Hinduism. In reality it is one of those pretentious things to not look like a simpleton...to try and come off as if u r well informed, u have class, and u have travelled wide and far to gain wisdom, etc.
@masterchief_mirza get a load of this guy :cheesy:

"We dominate the cultural space"

...

.........

:rofl: :pop:

Glad they found something they can finally dominate.
 
.
For you Japanese ,indigenous African Countries ,India and numerous other countries have no culture but muslims have one ,

Precisely. Japan borrows heavily from Chinese culture. The indigenous elements are Shinto voodoo. Add SE Asians and Native Americans to your list. Inferior cultures basically.


William H Gilbert said in his Peoples of India: “In the history of human culture, the contribution of the Indian people in all fields has been of the greatest importance. From India we are said to have derived domestic poultry, shellac, lemons, cotton, jute, rice, sugar, indigo, the buffalo, cinnamon, ginger, pepper, sugar-cane, the games of chess, pachisi, and polo, the zero concept, the decimal system, the basis of certain philological concepts, a wealth of fables with moral import, an astonishing variety of artistic products, and innumerable ideas of philosophy and religion such as asceticism and monasticism.”
In this same regard, Rabindranatha Tagore also related, “I cannot but bring to your mind those days when the whole of Eastern Asia, from Burma to Japan was united with India in the closest ties of friendship.”
A. L. Basham also felt that India was extremely important, as he says in his Cultural History of India: “There are four main cradles of civilization, from which elements of culture have spread to other parts of the world. These are, moving from east to west, China, the Indian subcontinent, the ‘Fertile Crescent’, and the Mediterranean, especially Greece and Italy. Of these four areas, India deserves a larger share of the credit than she is usually given, because, on a minimum assessment, she has deeply affected the religious life of most of Asia, as well as extending her influence, directly or indirectly, to other parts of the world.”
Pierre Sonnerat also explained, “We find among the Indians the vestiges of the most remote antiquity... We know that all peoples came there to draw the elements of their knowledge... India, in her splendour, gave religions and laws to all the other peoples; Egypt and Greece owed to her both their fables and their wisdom.” 4
The German historian and novelist Friedrich Schlegel saw in Sanskrit the “original language,” or what is now called the Proto-Indo-European language, and declared in 1803 that, “Everything without exception is of Indian origin... ” 5 Also, “Whether directly or indirectly, all nations are originally nothing but Indian colonies... The oriental antiquity could, if we consented to deepen it, bring us back more safely towards the divine.” 6
Regardless of how much various religions in the past or even today have tried to wipe out or minimize the advanced nature of Vedic culture, they still could not do that, as explained as follows by Higgins: “The peninsula of India would be one of the first peopled countries, and its inhabitants would have all the habits of the progenitors of man before the flood in as much perfection or more than any other nation... In short, whatever learning man possessed before his dispersion may be expected to be found here, and of this, Hindustan affords innumerable traces... notwithstanding ... the fruitless efforts of our priests to disguise it.” 7
Even Vedic culture’s deep spirituality is found to be the underlying basis of other religions, as explained by Maurice Maeterlinck: “Thanks to the labors of a science which is comparatively recent, and more especially to the researches of the students of Hindu and Egyptian antiquities, it is very much easier today than it was not so long ago to discover the source, to ascend the course and unravel the underground network of that great mysterious river which since the beginning of history has been flowing beneath all the religions, all the faiths, and all the philosophies: in a word, beneath all the visible and everyday manifestations of human thought. It is now hardly to be contested that this source is to be found in ancient India. Thence in all probability the sacred teaching spread into Egypt, found its way to ancient Persia and Chaldea, permeated the Hebrew race, and crept into Greece and the north of Europe, finally reaching China and even America.” 8
Professor James Traub, in India–The Challenge of Change, goes on to say: “Five thousand years ago, civilization of India was age-old. This civilization should be much older with many millennia of human endeavor behind it. Five thousand years ago, when the peoples of Europe were hauling stones across the face of the continent and grubbing out a meager existence, Indians throughout what is now western and southern Pakistan and Punjab, and even farther to the East, were living in elaborately designed cities, with sturdy houses, broad, straight roads, public baths, and drainage systems that were hardly equaled until the Roman era three thousand years later.... But five thousand years ago, according to archeologist John Marshal, the Indus Valley civilization was already age-old and stereotyped on Indian soil, with many millennia of human endeavor behind it. Usually we think of Mesopotamia as the cradle of civilization, but evidence suggests that the society of northwestern India, which has preserved its essential spirit over countless generations, deserve equal billing.”
Not only was the Vedic Indian influence recognized to the west of India, but also far to the east, as explained by Rene Grousset in Farther India and the Malay Archipelago (Volume II): “In the high plateau of eastern Iran, in the oases of Serindia, in the arid wastes of Tibet, Mongolia, and Manchuria, in the ancient civilized lands of China and Japan, in the lands of the primitive Mons and Khmers and other tribes of India-China, in the countries of the Malaya-Polynesians, in Indonesia and Malay, India left the indelible impress of her high culture, not only upon religion, but also upon art, and literature, in a word, all the higher things of spirit... There is an obstinate prejudice thanks to which India is constantly represented as having lived, as it were, hermetically sealed up in its age-old civilization, apart from the rest of Asia. Nothing could be more exaggerated. During the first eight centuries of our era, so far as religion and art are concerned, central Asia was a sort of Indian colony. It is often forgotten that in the early Middle Ages there existed a ‘Greater India,’ a vast Indian empire. A man coming from the Ganges or the Deccan to Southeast Asia felt as much at home there as in his own native land. In those days the Indian Ocean really deserved its name.”
Will Durant in his Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage, goes on to say, “It is true that even across the Himalayan barrier India has sent to us such questionable gifts as grammar and logic, philosophy and fables, hypnotism and chess, and above all, our numerals and our decimal system. But these are not the essence of her spirit; they are trifles compared to what we may learn from her in the future. As invention, industry and trade bind the continents together, or as they fling us into conflict with Asia, we shall study its civilization more closely, and shall absorb, even in enmity, some of its ways and thoughts. Perhaps, in return for conquest, arrogance and spoliation, India will teach us the tolerance and gentleness of the mature mind, the quiet content of the unacquisitive soul, the calm of the understanding spirit and a unifying, pacifying love for all living things.”


You are nothing in comparison.

Garbage. This is precisely what I wrote in my first post that you responded to. Let me quote part of it:
...You view yourself from Western perspectives, you validate your worth based on Western opinions. Westerners behind their PC facade and nice exterior view you rats as nothing more than sewage...

Most of the quotes posted are trash basically. What does this even mean?
The German historian and novelist Friedrich Schlegel ... and declared in 1803 that, “Everything without exception is of Indian origin... ” 5
Garbage.
In short, whatever learning man possessed before his dispersion may be expected to be found here, and of this, Hindustan affords innumerable traces... notwithstanding ... the fruitless efforts of our priests to disguise it.” 7
LOL! Garbage.
Also, “Whether directly or indirectly, all nations are originally nothing but Indian colonies... The oriental antiquity could, if we consented to deepen it, bring us back more safely towards the divine.” 6
Beyond garbage.

But oh well, white man said so..

You are ugly people with ugly culture. The filthiest nation on Earth <- I doubt you can disagree with that.
 
.
Precisely. Japan borrows heavily from Chinese culture. The indigenous elements are Shinto voodoo. Add SE Asians and Native Americans to your list. Inferior cultures basically.




Garbage. This is precisely what I wrote in my first post that you responded to. Let me quote part of it:


Most of the quotes posted are trash basically. What does this even mean?

Garbage.

LOL! Garbage.

Beyond garbage.

But oh well, white man said so..

You are ugly people with ugly culture. The filthiest nation on Earth <- I doubt you can disagree with that.
You just showed your "culture" in that post and half of it was not surprisingly "garbage".🥱
 
.
No they're not. I used to spend my summers in Thailand and yes that includes the South. They had some separatist issues a while back but its died down.

View attachment 725821

okay wikipedia says the Thai Islamic insurgency is still ongoing. Just a lull in the fighting. Muslims still want to take and Buddhists don't want them to take. Plus, Buddhists have a VERY bad history with Islam. Wiki decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent.

the chart you show does not include Canada. I only spoke of Canada (and Thailand).

"According to the surveys conducted by the Angus Reid Institute (ARI), 24% of the Canadians had a favorable opinion of Islam in 2013 which increased to 34% in the 2016 survey and in Quebec, it increased from 16% in 2013 to 32% in 2016."
 
.
Back
Top Bottom