Big Shock to India: G20 Boycott: Many Countries refuse to go to Indian Occupied Kashmir in Srinagar

[Hulk]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1660649030987161600

Can you understand that India is a pariah in the international community?

Germany G-20

View attachment 931065
View attachment 931066

Turkey G-20

View attachment 931068View attachment 931069


Japan G-20

View attachment 931070

Argentina G-20

View attachment 931071

It's different from what Indians imagine. In the international community, India is only a second-rate country. But now Indians believe that the G-20 belongs only to India.

I pity you, you do not even know this is not a G20 of the head of states.

 

[Kaniska]

Yes, it's likely that we may host one of the World Cup 2023 matches in Kashmir

A total of 48 matches will be played at this event and as per sources, one of the matches during the final leg of the event, could be held in Srinagar.

Kashmir To Host International Cricket Match After 37 Years During ODI World Cup 2023: Report

India took on Australia in the last international match played in Kashmir on September 9, 1986.

news.abplive.com

If Pakistan reaches Super 6 this time, the BCCI might ask them to go to Srinagar. If they refuse, which is likely, they can lose the tournament. So this is going to be so much fun in coming days

It would be a great event if they host one of the matches for the cricket world cup in Sri Nagar. But I have a different opinion about the Pakistan cricket team. Let us try to have a different strategy while dealing with Pakistan from the political and diplomacy front to a cricket match.

I feel, if Pakistan come to India for playing matches, they should be treated like a guest and understand their sentiment as much as possible.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1660649030987161600

I pity you, you do not even know this is not a G20 of the head of states.

These guys are trolls and may be on the payroll of their own Govt agency...Except Bejingwalker, rest of their folks behave like our Indian and Pakistan posters which is quite unnatural for Chines people

 

[Kuru]

He’s not wrong. We can huff and puff but the ground realities are such that New Delhi needs Islamabad on board not make/cause a scene and there’s not much you military can do. I think there were back door deals made as both capitals are sleazy to the core and will line their pockets while making fools out of us both.

That’s too far fetched to be believable. You mean Pakistan agreed for India to annex Kashmir? Only to observe 2 min silence as a mark of protest? Common man, you can do better than that.

Can you understand that India is a pariah in the international community?

Germany G-20

View attachment 931065
View attachment 931066

Turkey G-20

View attachment 931068View attachment 931069


Japan G-20

View attachment 931070

Argentina G-20

View attachment 931071

It's different from what Indians imagine. In the international community, India is only a second-rate country. But now Indians believe that the G-20 belongs only to India.

Who said G20 belongs to India lol.
I’m only saying no one should come to India at all if it’s 2nd rate country buddy. That’s all.

On the other hand, China, the first rate and non-pariah country, should have better influence rate than mere 15%.

All the best for the next time.

 

[renhai]

That’s too far fetched to be believable. You mean Pakistan agreed for India to annex Kashmir? Only to observe 2 min silence as a mark of protest? Common man, you can do better than that.


Who said G20 belongs to India lol.
I’m only saying no one should come to India at all if it’s 2nd rate country buddy. That’s all.

On the other hand, China, the first rate and non-pariah country, should have better influence rate than mere 15%.

All the best for the next time.

In our modern civilized world. Each G-20 summit is attended by 100% of its members. Only in India is 85%. The Indians created this history. What you call 'only 15% reject the Indian G-20'. Unfortunately, it's difficult for you to understand. In other countries. No one or 0% will reject G-20.

 

[Kaniska]

He’s not wrong. We can huff and puff but the ground realities are such that New Delhi needs Islamabad on board not make/cause a scene and there’s not much you military can do. I think there were back door deals made as both capitals are sleazy to the core and will line their pockets while making fools out of us both.

I agree with you. Even if there is no alignment at the political level between India and Pakistan, but NSA of both of these nations is always in touch.

 

[Kuru]

In our modern civilized world. Each G-20 summit is attended by 100% of its members. Only in India is 85%. The Indians created this history. What you call 'only 15% reject the Indian G-20'. Unfortunately, it's difficult for you to understand. In other countries. No one or 0% will reject G-20.

Yeah but China leading the way - as the article calls it - should influence all countries to not go to Kashmir. That didn’t happen. And that’s why I’m sad.

 

[zhxy]

In our modern civilized world. Each G-20 summit is attended by 100% of its members. Only in India is 85%. The Indians created this history. What you call 'only 15% reject the Indian G-20'. Unfortunately, it's difficult for you to understand. In other countries. No one or 0% will reject G-20.

No, not all G20 summits are attended by 100% of its members. In some cases, leaders may choose not to attend due to scheduling conflicts or other reasons. For example, in 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend the G20 summit in Australia due to tensions between the two countries over the annexation of Crimea. In 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend the G20 summit in Indonesia due to the ongoing war in Ukraine.

In addition, some countries may be represented by a lower-level official, such as a finance minister or a foreign minister, instead of the head of state. This is often the case for countries that are not major economies or that are not members of the United Nations Security Council. For example, in 2019, the leaders of Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa were all represented by their finance ministers at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan.

Overall, attendance at G20 summits is not mandatory and is ultimately up to the discretion of each member country.

 

[renhai]

Yeah but China leading the way - as the article calls it - should influence all countries to not go to Kashmir. That didn’t happen. And that’s why I’m sad.

0% reject G-20 from other countries. 15% reject the Indian version G-20.

15%＞0%。 India wins again. India is the TOP ONE of the universe. congratulate!

No, not all G20 summits are attended by 100% of its members. In some cases, leaders may choose not to attend due to scheduling conflicts or other reasons. For example, in 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend the G20 summit in Australia due to tensions between the two countries over the annexation of Crimea. In 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend the G20 summit in Indonesia due to the ongoing war in Ukraine.

In addition, some countries may be represented by a lower-level official, such as a finance minister or a foreign minister, instead of the head of state. This is often the case for countries that are not major economies or that are not members of the United Nations Security Council. For example, in 2019, the leaders of Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa were all represented by their finance ministers at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan.

Overall, attendance at G20 summits is not mandatory and is ultimately up to the discretion of each member country.

Mmm. We can understand that India is not an important country.

 

[mulj]

Mexico also pulled of, so basically this is meeting where pajeets will entertain their white collonial masters

 

[AA_]

That’s too far fetched to be believable. You mean Pakistan agreed for India to annex Kashmir?

Yes exactly that. Look man, I wasn’t happy but it was a fait accompli. GHQ doesn’t want to fight but make money. Balakot got too real for them and that was the last straw. Of course all of them are in cahoots. Every government (establishment) talks to each other. BJP at its core might not be as sleazy but the sleaze comes along with money. Both sides milked a cow that’s now run dry. You don’t have to believe me
And that’s fine as well. Just a waste of resources and ruined the lives of so many innocent on both sides regardless of religion.

I agree with you. Even if there is no alignment at the political level between India and Pakistan, but NSA of both of these nations is always in touch.

They wrote a tell all book - both former heads of the spy agency. Who does that? It’s just that our establishment caught on too late to the make money game while yours knew 20 years ago.

 

[Kaniska]

Yes exactly that. Look man, I wasn’t happy but it was a fait accompli. GHQ doesn’t want to fight but make money. Balakot got too real for them and that was the last straw. Of course all of them are in cahoots. Every government (establishment) talks to each other. BJP at its core might not be as sleazy but the sleaze comes along with money. Both sides milked a cow that’s now run dry. You don’t have to believe me
And that’s fine as well. Just a waste of resources and ruined the lives of so many innocent on both sides regardless of religion.


They wrote a tell all book - both former heads of the spy agency. Who does that? It’s just that our establishment caught on too late to the make money game while yours knew 20 years ago.

Within the Indian Gov policy making departments, there is always a soft corner for Pakistan political parties even though we are always hostile to each other. Because, it is our assessment that in general people of Pakistan and political parties are not so hateful or anti-India to the core, but your army used your own people to keep the hostility alive forever. It may not be completely wrong.
Basically, it points to the fact that Army rules Pakistan. So our Govt preferred to talk to your army directly after the Kargil war bypassing your civilian Govt. That is even the case when IK was in power too.

 

[AA_]

Within the Indian Gov policy making departments, there is always a soft corner for Pakistan political parties even though we are always hostile to each other. Because, it is our assessment that in general people of Pakistan and political parties are not so hateful or anti-India to the core, but your army used your own people to keep the hostility alive forever. It may not be completely wrong.
Basically, it points to the fact that Army rules Pakistan. So our Govt preferred to talk to your army directly after the Kargil war bypassing your civilian Govt. That is even the case when IK was in power too.

We’re not hateful but the divide between people has grown considerably given the cause and effect of the past 20 years. Many Pakistanis have started interacting with the Indians, especially right wing ones which in turn has turned most of us into more anti - Indian. It could also be the last 20 years has seen formative Pakistani identity taking root which is independent of the Indian one.

Pakistan has developed a distinct culture and identity and finding less in common with the countries in the region no matter strong the previous ties were.

 

[Burnol_Wala]

We’re not hateful but the divide between people has grown considerably given the cause and effect of the past 20 years. Many Pakistanis have started interacting with the Indians, especially right wing ones which in turn has turned most of us into more anti - Indian. It could also be the last 20 years has seen formative Pakistani identity taking root which is independent of the Indian one.

Pakistan has developed a distinct culture and identity and finding less in common with the countries in the region no matter strong the previous ties were.

you are right, the divide has increased a lot in last 20 years, Economy , Military , Global influence wise . We are poised to become 3rd largest economy in 5-7 years while you are about to default soon

 

[AA_]

you are right, the divide has increased a lot in last 20 years, Economy , Military , Global influence wise . We are poised to become 3rd largest economy in 5-7 years while you are about to default soon

1.5bn and your gdp isn’t that much more than a 7x smaller Pakistan. Why don’t you take some of that wealth and put it towards the 800mn poor Indians living in poverty instead of dick measuring with us. The fact of the matter is, no matter how rich you become, you will always be losers like the Indians I see in the US that talk non stop about how much money have but get passed over by most women because theyre quite frankly speaking, weird and unattractive. They’re paying large sums of money to have their legs broken to get their height extended to better their odds, but that still isn’t working for them. Congrats on the 3rd largest economy, but with 800 poor people going to sleep hungry each night.

 

[NG Missile Vessels]

Mexico also pulled of, so basically this is meeting where pajeets will entertain their white collonial masters

The delegates from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, United Kingdom, USA and EU were among those in attendance at the inaugural third tourism working group meeting at the Sheri Kashmir International Convention Centre (SKICC) on the banks of city’s iconic Dal Lake. While China boycotted the event, private tour operators represented Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

Shikara rides, tourism talks: G20 sets sail in Srinagar

Delegates from 19 of the Group of 20 (G20) nations participated in the latest round of meetings, which commenced in Srinagar

www.google.com