What's new

Big Shock to India: G20 Boycott: Many Countries refuse to go to Indian Occupied Kashmir in Srinagar

Like what ? Indians boycott travelling or sending students to the regions ? China doesn't want beggars anyway. Or start like a 1962 war ?
Do you think India wants to host China ? it is up to them to attend or skip, we dont care if they dont attend. China built CPEC in the territory that we have a claim. Then, what moral right they have to skip this meeting ?
 
Your mumbling makes no sense. We are talking about China's stance, not the world. The world has not skipped G20, China has.

Because China thinks it's a disputed territory, it cannot sit for a meet. Whilst building infra projects through the same disputed territory.

You think the world doesn't notice?

View attachment 930480
India is building infras in the disputed territory in the first place, so, whats the fuss for Pakistanis to build the infras on their side with Chinese help?

Do you think India wants to host China ? it is up to them to attend or skip, we dont care if they dont attend. China built CPEC in the territory that we have a claim. Then, what moral right they have to skip this meeting ?
India is building infras in the disputed territory first, so, whats the fuss for Pakistan to build infras on their side with Chinese help ?
 
Last edited:
India should do the same for Tibet and Xinjiang.

If India dare to do that. But Tibet and Xinjiang are parts of China and recognized worldwide, India included. It is not a disputed region, unlike Kashmir, which is considered by every country and UN as a disputed region.

See the clear difference?
 
If India dare to do that. But Tibet and Xinjiang are parts of China and recognized worldwide, India included. It is not a disputed region, unlike Kashmir, which is considered by every country and UN as a disputed region.

See the clear difference?
The reason is our stupid PM 'Nehru' who accepted Tibet as part of china, for their friendship. He is the most stupidest PM in indian history. Even if a kid was Indian PM at 1957, he would only accept Tibet only if China accepted Kashmir. its no brainer :) , in anycase, china or any other country can skip , G20 will continue
 
The reason is our stupid PM 'Nehru' who accepted Tibet as part of china, for their friendship. He is the most stupidest PM in indian history. Even if a kid was Indian PM at 1957, he would only accept Tibet only if China accepted Kashmir. its no brainer :) , in anycase, china or any other country can skip , G20 will continue
Lol, Kashmir is a disputed territory as recognized by the UN and all the countries in the world, Tibet is recognized as a Chinese territory by the UN and all the countries in the world, so what's you Indians' basis for not accepting Tibet is Chinese but Indian ? That's why you people need to be taught a lesson like the 1962 war. For you ignorant Indian, Tibet has been part of China since the Yuan dynasty in China 700 years ago.


9_292020_yuan-map-18202.jpg
 
Last edited:
Big Shock to India: G20, China, Saudia, Turkey, Egypt & Indonesia refuse to go to Indian Occupied Kashmir in Srinagar

This is a serious blow to India and its world reputation. The G20 Boycott is not something Modi's BJP government was expecting. India wanted to show the world that Kashmir Srinagar is now part of India, while the World has given a serious blow to India as Kahmir is still one of the crucial most Disputed region.

Srinagar G20 boycott

INDIA’S efforts to normalise its dubious annexation of held Kashmir have suffered a serious blow as a number of G20 countries have either refused to attend a tourism moot scheduled to begin in Srinagar on Monday, or have yet to commit to attending the event.

China has taken the lead in boycotting the event in the occupied region as its foreign ministry spokesperson said that his country “is firmly opposed to holding … meetings in disputed territory”. Moreover, Indian media has reported that Turkiye and Saudi Arabia, both G20 members, have yet to confirm participation while Egypt, which is not a member of the bloc but was invited as a guest, has also not yet registered for the event.

It is heartening to note that these nations have taken a brave step in solidarity with the oppressed people of held Kashmir. While Srinagar may be a picturesque locale for a tourism conference, the suffocating footprint of India’s occupation, and the blood of countless Kashmiris spilled by Indian forces, means that all conscientious nations should stay away from what is still internationally recognised as a disputed territory.

Reports from the occupied territory indicate that India is pulling out all the stops to ‘sanitise’ the situation. According to Mehbooba Mufti, former chief minister of IHK, India has unleashed “unprecedented … arrests, raids, surveillance and persecution” ahead of the G20 moot.

As the UN special rapporteur on minority rights recently noted, by organising the meeting in Srinagar, India sought to normalise “brutal and repressive denial” of rights of Kashmiri Muslims, while adding that the G20 was “unwittingly providing a veneer of support” to India’s violations of human rights in the disputed region.

India’s rulers arrogantly consider Kashmir to be a non-issue on the international agenda after they annexed the region in 2019. However, when powerful members of the G20 object to this normalisation of occupation, many in New Delhi will have a rude awakening.

While it is true that the international order is mainly governed by realpolitik and the absence of ethical guidelines, some global players are still willing to raise a voice for oppressed peoples around the world. What is particularly unfortunate is that G20’s Western members — who have been crying hoarse over Russia’s occupation of Ukraine — have gladly given their stamp of approval to India’s occupation of Kashmir.

Published in Dawn, May 21st, 2023
 
China has said it will not attend the G20 Indian meet, citing its firm opposition “to holding any kind of G20 meetings in disputed territory”. In April, Pakistan, which also lays claim to Kashmir but is not a G20 member, described the meeting as irresponsible.

Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Indonesia were also expected to stay away.

The former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Mehbooba Mufti claimed India had turned the region into the equivalent of the Guantánamo Bay prison simply to hold a meeting on tourism. She also accused the Bharatiya Janata party, the party of the prime minister, Narendra Modi, of hijacking the G20 for its promotional purposes.

India divided the Muslim-majority state of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 to create two federally administered territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. Ladakh is a disputed frontier region along the line of actual control between India and China, and both countries claim parts of it.
 
India has allowed a face saver to these countries that are scared to attend due to terroriism from Pakistan. They have invoked some political reason for not attending due to fear for their lives from Pak sponsored terror threat that Bhutto had made while in India.
 
Last edited:
Facts have proven that India is not suitable for hosting international conferences.
 
So China can use disputed territory between India and Pakistan, and build projects for CPEC which is fine for their Govt, but India can not hold a meeting in its own territory even if it is disputed by others? This is called hypocrisy.

It is a masterstroke by the BJP Govt to hold such kind of meetings in JK. One of the key objectives would be to showcase the hypocrisy of Islamic nations and China. Everyone was expecting such kind of boycott by Islamic nations as well as China . But I am happy to see GOI went ahead with their decision and continued with the meeting.
 
It's okay, we didn't expect everyone to come to Kashmir this time around.

G20 is 19 countries + EU.
So 17 countries (including EU) out of 20 is attending this meet in Kashmir. It's is like 85% success rate. I have to say, it's a job well done.

We will continue to hold multilateral conferences in Kashmir for the next few years and such events in Kashmir will become so much normal that even Pakistan will attend one of those in future :-)

China has taken the lead in boycotting the event in the occupied region as its foreign ministry spokesperson said that his country “is firmly opposed to holding … meetings in disputed territory”.
China took a lead and could convince only 2 countries not to go to Kashmir? How's that 'taking a lead' exactly?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom