What's new

Beijing Court Declares Apple Has Infringed Chinese Patent

Next what ?

BMW infringed chinese patent laws because they are using the same log as chinese automaker BYD?
Chinese-Car-Logo-Rip-offs-1.jpeg



Toyota infringed the patent of Geely ?
Chinese-Car-Logo-Rip-offs-6.jpeg

lol

this geely logo
https://www.google.se/search?q=geel...hUKEwiC7I2-mK_NAhXBtBQKHb97BBwQ_AUIBigB&dpr=1
TD2DMG2.jpg

this is byd
lRPQUx9.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
From Wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co.

193 iPhone GUI images filed by Apple on June 23, 2007 in color design patent USD604305.[9]

On January 5, 2007, 4 days before the iPhone was introduced to the world, Apple filed a suite of 4 design patents covering the basic shape of the iPhone. These were followed up in June of that year with a massive filing of a color design patent covering 193 screen shots of various iPhone graphical user interfaces. It is from these filings along with Apple's utility patents, registered trademarks and trade dress rights, that Apple selected the particular intellectual property to enforce against Samsung.[9] Apple sued its component supplier Samsung, alleging in a 38-page federal complaint on April 15, 2011 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that several of Samsung's Android phones and tablets, including the Nexus S, Epic 4G, Galaxy S 4G, and the Samsung Galaxy Tab, infringed on Apple’s intellectual property: its patents, trademarks, user interface and style.[10] Apple's complaint included specific federal claims for patent infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition, and trademark infringement, as well as state-level claims for unfair competition, common law trademark infringement, and unjust enrichment.[2][11]

+==============



Facts:

1) Apple filed suit against Samsung covering basic shape and color ect. etc.

2) Apple won a ruling in its favor in the U.S., Samsung won rulings in South Korea, Japan, and UK.

3) Justice is not being fund in courts sometimes, if it's involving commercial interest, politics etc etc.


IN the above article, a Chinese company just use an Apple arrow to shoot Apple.
 
. . .
Beside learning English, I think you should learn Chinese, you can learn more, :-)


你好!

Yeah why not, But remembering those 3000+ chinese alphabets is some what difficult.

In my native we have 56 alphabets and English has 26 !
 
.
你好!

Yeah why not, But remembering those 3000+ chinese alphabets is some what difficult.

In my native we have 56 alphabets and English has 26 !
Not bad, work harder, it worth you doing that, after learning Chinese well, you will find many interesting thing in China, much more than you can get now:-)
 
.
Not bad, work harder, it worth you doing that, after learning Chinese well, you will find many interesting thing in China, much more than you can get now:-)

You can also learn Indian Languages, India is incredible !
 
. . .
What we are talking about is Apple leaving Chinese industry, which will indeed be a disaster for Chinese, because irrespective of the share of Apple, it is the premium most smartphone by a margin.

In our view, it is not. It is just one of the many equal options. So, its departure, albeit unlikely given the size of China's market, would not be felt.

The moral of the story is that they will have to settle the issue of IP infringement now that they lost the case. They will either pull the product from the Beijing market (if, the Chinese company decides to take the issue to a higher court with nationally binding verdict), or to pay royalty to the original IP owner.

I guess China will be watching US politicized court cases against Chinese companies. If they insist on harming China's interests, China will return the favor. This case is just an early sign.
 
. . .
Shenzhen Company Sues Apple for Patent Infringement
2016-06-18

4670610d78c74b0fb288c9c3aff20e2f.jpg


The picture shows three differences of design between Baili's 100c and Apple's iphone 6. [Photo: china.com.cn]

A Shenzhen-based company recently sued US-based Apple Inc. for infringing the patent of their mobile phone design.

Media reports said Baili Marketing Service Co. delivered an application to the Beijing Intellectual Property Bureau, demanding Apple stop selling its iPhone6 and iPhone 6 plus models.

The Bureau issued a decision in May, saying that as the difference between Baili's 100c and Apple's iPhone 6 and 6 plus is too small for customers to recognize, Apple should stop selling related products.

Apple made a motion against the decision and explained their products have many obviously different design points from Baili's 100c mobile phone.

The Beijing Intellectual Property Court agreed to hear Apple's appeal.
 
.
Chinese companies nowadays own real technologies, while American companies like Apple normally like to sue others for infringement of their designs. It has been a known fact in recent years.

Many people, trying desperately to uphold their false belief of the US superiority in tech, says design, which are mostly art and marketing works, are technologies.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom