What's new

Beijing concerned over increasing cost of security of CPEC: Chinese state media

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThaniOruvan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
740
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
India
Beijing: China is concerned over "increasing cost of security" and "potential setbacks" in the development of the $46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, an official daily said on Tuesday recognising the risks involved with the project due to a "complex regional environment". concerned

An article in the Global Times said the ambitious project - that passes through the Azad Kashmir - is unlikely to have a "plain sailing". It also referred to the reported deployment of 14,503 security guards by Pakistan to protect the 7,036 Chinese nationals working on the corridor.


"China may not want to put too much focus on the region. At the very least, it would be unwise to put all its eggs in one basket," it said highlighting China's disquiet over the project which has also cast a shadow over India-China ties. Prime Minister Narendra Modi raised concerns over the project in his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the G20 meet in Hangzhou on 4 September.

The article, however, made no reference to India regarding the project, which connects China's Xinjiang province to Pakistan's southwestern Gwadar Port in Balochistan with a maze of rail, road and pipelines.

"The CPEC has long been seen as symbolic to Sino-Pakistan economic cooperation. It is unlikely that China will change its supportive attitude on the CPEC in the short term, but the increasing cost of security is becoming a big problem in efficiently pushing forward the projects," the article said. The daily, which in the past has strongly supported the project, said in the article that it is "unlikely to be plain sailing for China and Pakistan in their attempts to push forward the CPEC due to challenges such as a complex regional environment, and people in the two countries should be prepared for potential setbacks".

The daily is part of the ruling Communist Party of China's official organ -the People's Daily publication group. It also raised questions over Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's comments last month that Pakistan attached priority to the project. Referring to Sharif's comments, it said "given the difficulty of protecting the personnel that are working in Pakistan, projects under the CPEC may need to be implemented and assessed step-by-step".

"Beijing should consider giving more attention to its economic cooperation" with Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam, whose Prime Minster is currently visiting China, to improve ties despite differences over the South China Sea. China is reportedly concerned after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Vietnam's capital Hanoi this month.

"The CPEC has long been seen as a flagship project in China's Belt and Road initiative, but the initiative's strategic focus may need to shift gradually toward Southeast Asia, where there is awide infrastructure funding gap but a relatively stable regional environment that will enable China to efficiently push forward ventures under the Belt and Road initiative," it said.

"Hopefully, the two countries (China and Vietnam) will be able to put aside disputes that have arose over the South China Sea and focus on promoting economic development," it said.

Link: http://m.firstpost.com/politics/bei...rity-of-cpec-chinese-state-media-3002644.html

=================================

This time concern is raised from Chinese side. No India, no RAW, no Modi in picture.
 
. . .
I love how much weight the Indian media gives to these "opinion pieces" from the Global Times.

You can basically pick whatever "opinion piece" (out of countless others) that suits your own narrative then claim that is the Chinese government position.

Sorry, no. The official position is given by the Government itself. Certainly not by opinion pieces in the Global Times of all things.
 
. .
I love how much weight the Indian media gives to these "opinion pieces" from the Global Times.

You can basically pick whatever "opinion piece" (out of countless others) that suits your own narrative then claim that is the Chinese government position.

Sorry, no. The official position is given by the Government itself. Certainly not by opinion pieces in the Global Times of all things.

Exactly! If I see something considerable regarding CPEC it should at least come from secretary of foreign relations. Any infornation below that title from government or non-governmental sources (especially them) should be considered as pure gossip.
 
.
CPEC is just a emergency wartime oil supply enema insurance for China, from remote uninhabited areas in China to remote uninhabited areas in Pakistan, and despite the planned gas pipeline, transporting crude using ulcc/vlcc along current sea routes from the ME to China will remain the primary energy feed to China, and it remains vulnerable, 'murricans can choke them without firing a shot.
 
.
More than 14 thousand Pakistani guards for 7 thousand Chinese citizens working on the projects :lol:. That means Pakistani army is funding security for Chinese citizen on Pakistan land. Where are the real beneficiary i.e. Pakistani Citizens, this project has only created jobs for Chinese citizens, have to appreciate CCP for their good work, well done China & CCP for worrying about the employment of your citizen.
 
.
More than 14 thousand Pakistani guards for 7 thousand Chinese citizens working on the projects :lol:. That means Pakistani army is funding security for Chinese citizen on Pakistan land. Where are the real beneficiary i.e. Pakistani Citizens, this project has only created jobs for Chinese citizens, have to appreciate CCP for their good work, well done China & CCP for worrying about the employment of your citizen.

Whatever you have posted is completely opposite to the opinion piece in OP.
 
.
I also have concern for cpec and that it should be completed within time. We have stakes in this, our Chinese friends have a right to voice their concern if any. Meanwhile the project has to be taken to its conclusion and economic cooperation is also good be it extended on any side.

What we need to know is that the world nowadays is more about economy, a good economy with a thriving, active, trained population will reap more fruits for any country than engaging in petty conflicts. Hope everyone can understand, much of the nonsense the politicians bring up and delay things.

.
 
.
Security situation is much better then what we have in the past.. but still we have to work hard till peace come in Afghanistan..
 
Last edited:
.
The only ones "forever concerned" about CPEC are Indians. :omghaha:

On a side note, every time Indian media hears about CPEC it goes:

giphy.gif
 
. .
Plz provide Global Times link? till then we should consider it bharti propaganda..

on Topic, Security situation is much better then what we have in the past.. but still we have to work hard till peace come in Afghanistan..


Global Times
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max
.
More than 14 thousand Pakistani guards for 7 thousand Chinese citizens working on the projects :lol:. That means Pakistani army is funding security for Chinese citizen on Pakistan land. Where are the real beneficiary i.e. Pakistani Citizens, this project has only created jobs for Chinese citizens, have to appreciate CCP for their good work, well done China & CCP for worrying about the employment of your citizen.
You have any idea, how many Pakistani workers are involved in this project?
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom