What's new

Beijing concerned over increasing cost of security of CPEC: Chinese state media

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love how much weight the Indian media gives to these "opinion pieces" from the Global Times.

You can basically pick whatever "opinion piece" (out of countless others) that suits your own narrative then claim that is the Chinese government position.

Sorry, no. The official position is given by the Government itself. Certainly not by opinion pieces in the Global Times of all things.

The CPEC port is coming, whether indians like it or not. China is not going to waste $46b on a failed project. indian agents can try and sabotage it, but the Pakistani and Chinese involved are not stupid. Assets will be protected one way or another.
 
.
You have any idea, how many Pakistani workers are involved in this project?
Post a data to prove your point do not raise a question, how would I know ?:lol: But I read 14+ thousand Army personnel guarding citizens of other country, who are working on Pakistan's land. Its like Pakistan is some African country with no skilled labour and China is the one providing the labour force, Pakistan should raise this concern with Chinese government. How can Pakistan allow 7+ thousand Chinese, when they have skilled and cheap labour available in their own country. :undecided:
 
.
Beijing: China is concerned over "increasing cost of security" and "potential setbacks" in the development of the $46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, an official daily said on Tuesday recognising the risks involved with the project due to a "complex regional environment". concerned

An article in the Global Times said the ambitious project - that passes through the Azad Kashmir - is unlikely to have a "plain sailing". It also referred to the reported deployment of 14,503 security guards by Pakistan to protect the 7,036 Chinese nationals working on the corridor.


"China may not want to put too much focus on the region. At the very least, it would be unwise to put all its eggs in one basket," it said highlighting China's disquiet over the project which has also cast a shadow over India-China ties. Prime Minister Narendra Modi raised concerns over the project in his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the G20 meet in Hangzhou on 4 September.

The article, however, made no reference to India regarding the project, which connects China's Xinjiang province to Pakistan's southwestern Gwadar Port in Balochistan with a maze of rail, road and pipelines.

"The CPEC has long been seen as symbolic to Sino-Pakistan economic cooperation. It is unlikely that China will change its supportive attitude on the CPEC in the short term, but the increasing cost of security is becoming a big problem in efficiently pushing forward the projects," the article said. The daily, which in the past has strongly supported the project, said in the article that it is "unlikely to be plain sailing for China and Pakistan in their attempts to push forward the CPEC due to challenges such as a complex regional environment, and people in the two countries should be prepared for potential setbacks".

The daily is part of the ruling Communist Party of China's official organ -the People's Daily publication group. It also raised questions over Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's comments last month that Pakistan attached priority to the project. Referring to Sharif's comments, it said "given the difficulty of protecting the personnel that are working in Pakistan, projects under the CPEC may need to be implemented and assessed step-by-step".

"Beijing should consider giving more attention to its economic cooperation" with Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam, whose Prime Minster is currently visiting China, to improve ties despite differences over the South China Sea. China is reportedly concerned after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Vietnam's capital Hanoi this month.

"The CPEC has long been seen as a flagship project in China's Belt and Road initiative, but the initiative's strategic focus may need to shift gradually toward Southeast Asia, where there is awide infrastructure funding gap but a relatively stable regional environment that will enable China to efficiently push forward ventures under the Belt and Road initiative," it said.

"Hopefully, the two countries (China and Vietnam) will be able to put aside disputes that have arose over the South China Sea and focus on promoting economic development," it said.

Link: http://m.firstpost.com/politics/bei...rity-of-cpec-chinese-state-media-3002644.html

=================================

This time concern is raised from Chinese side. No India, no RAW, no Modi in picture.
It's raw
 
.
The CPEC port is coming, whether indians like it or not. China is not going to waste $46b on a failed project. indian agents can try and sabotage it, but the Pakistani and Chinese involved are not stupid. Assets will be protected one way or another.
Project will be completed within 8-10 years but the main concern raised by Chinese officials is regarding cost of securing the investment. You cannot deploy 10 thousand army personnel to protect a project, that is infeasible.
 
.
If according to Pakistan "Kashmir is disputed territory than the part occupied by Pakistan will also come under definition of disputed territory." So if Kashmir is disputed then obviously It will remain unresolved till both parties resolve their disputes meaning thereby India will continue to claim whole of Kashmir till the dispute is resolved. So India has legitimate right to reach third country i.e. China for protesting against the projects going to be built on disputed territory
 
.
Post a data to prove your point do not raise a question, how would I know ?:lol: But I read 14+ thousand Army personnel guarding citizens of other country, who are working on Pakistan's land. Its like Pakistan is some African country with no skilled labour and China is the one providing the labour force, Pakistan should raise this concern with Chinese government. How can Pakistan allow 7+ thousand Chinese, when they have skilled and cheap labour available in their own country. :undecided:
i never understand why chinese would not put the pakistanis to work for a change
 
.
Chalooooo ji...... No one invited him here on Kashmir and out of nowhere it stands in front of you. Kindly don't bring the Thorn in your *** in this conversation. It is totally irrelevant.
If according to Pakistan "Kashmir is disputed territory than the part occupied by Pakistan will also come under definition of disputed territory." So if Kashmir is disputed then obviously It will remain unresolved till both parties resolve their disputes meaning thereby India will continue to claim whole of Kashmir till the dispute is resolved. So India has legitimate right to reach third country i.e. China for protesting against the projects going to be built on disputed territory
 
.
If Global Times published the original article, then it must be true. :enjoy: After all, isn't Global Times published under the control of People's Daily, the CPC official newspaper?

Nevertheless, given how much China is investing in Pakistan, it has a right to raise concerns. CPEC will be a vital artery for China. It wants to protect it at all costs.
 
. .
i never understand why chinese would not put the pakistanis to work for a change
You cannot question CPEC in Pakistan, if you ask for even a little detail about CPEC project you will be tagged as an anti-national. They can't even question their government regarding the number of employment generated by the project and the share given to the Pakistani citizen, most of the projects under CPEC are built in Punjab province and other provinces are fighting to get the better share.

There are only two beneficiary of the whole CPEC program, one is definitely China and another one is Nawaz bhai and his political party.
 
. .
I love how much weight the Indian media gives to these "opinion pieces" from the Global Times.

You can basically pick whatever "opinion piece" (out of countless others) that suits your own narrative then claim that is the Chinese government position.

Sorry, no. The official position is given by the Government itself. Certainly not by opinion pieces in the Global Times of all things.
If there is any opinion piece in favor of china then it carries weight. If the opinion piece raises questions on Chinese policies then you people will easily distance yourself from these. This article emanated from china passing through all Chinese internet proxies and gateways. Which means global times is a valid news source in China. They have raised these questions. 7000 Chinese are not protected by 15000 security personnel ? See if you have proper answers.
 
.
say cpec and shupa power goes on fire.... don't know why?
 
. .
If there is any opinion piece in favor of china then it carries weight. If the opinion piece raises questions on Chinese policies then you people will easily distance yourself from these. This article emanated from china passing through all Chinese internet proxies and gateways. Which means global times is a valid news source in China. They have raised these questions. 7000 Chinese are not protected by 15000 security personnel ? See if you have proper answers.

The Global Times is an infamous "tabloid" here. Do you know what a tabloid is? It's like the Fox News of Chinese media.

Which no doubt is why Indian media loves it, since apparently all of Indian media behaves like tabloids do.

The Chinese government makes their position on issues very clear by making official statements. Anyone who takes these opinion pieces as representative of the official Government position is completely uninformed, and frankly making a joke of themselves.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom